Question

Relate Kolberg's stages of moral development (and its critiques), to our discussion of developing a pragmatic approach to last week's topic regarding sex-education. In your post, include how you would frame your opinion on Kolberg's scale, how you would interpret the moral position of those responsible for creating the ab-only policies that are a current standard in Mississippi, and how this all may influence adolescent moral development. Refer to lecture material as much as possible.

Last weeks discussion:

How, why, and when should children receive education about sex?  Include in your response references to lecture/course material to date, age(s) when it should be introduced and why, an examination of how you've developed your opinion, a counter perspective to your opinion, and summary remark. (You may, of course, present an opinion that sex education should not be offered and people left to 'figure it out on their own.")

Answer 1

On Kolberg's scale my opinion would be the principled level since individuals make ethical choices based on a fundamental set of standards that speak to their most vital values and convictions. At this level, individuals think more dynamically around their values and convictions. Subsequently, ethical quality is decided by a complex assessment of these ideological values Or maybe than a dazzle adherence to an existing set of rules. At this level of improvement, individuals apply these ideological values when making a assurance of right from off-base, and when assessing struggle between bunches of individuals with contradicting values such as distinctive devout bunches, diverse social bunches, or distinctive legislative bodies.

This level is subdivided into two stages. The ideological values of social equity and compassionate concern are considered to be critical, not the run the show or law itself. At this level, individuals recognize that rules and laws may require a few degree of translation and adaptability, and these rules and laws may require to be re-evaluated from time-to-time to guarantee the planning reason is still being met.

The possibility profits of sex education can't make realistically examined without at first establishing crazy the apprehensions and myths which keep those dynamic advancement of beneficial projects. The reality of the circumstance is that proficient and educated youths need aid less averse should postpone sexual relations until they feel inwardly prepared and have the capacity should make the fundamental precautions against pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. It may be key that sexuality projects make taught with values. Those capacity of a "moral" training may be on sway individuals to strive to those universally acknowledged beliefs about this equitable and pluralistic the public eye and will offer Realities which encourage mindful choice settling on. The quality for correspondence of the sexes, respect and admiration for the sum individual must be taught. An incredible contrast exists the middle of continuously good and being moralistic. For moralistic presentations those endeavor is constructed a force a personage side of the pointof view for a narrow minded route. Sex training projects need aid best taught from an ethical point of view which sways the acknowledged yearnings of this the public eye same time preserving distinct freedom. Provided for these guidelines, significantly those The majority questionable subjects might make talked about in class inside an ethical schema.

A personal satisfaction sex education project must incorporate the accompanying principles: upgrading those self-concept; preparation for m Also parenthood; seeing love; preparation for settling on capable decisions; making a difference individuals comprehend those need to parallel chances to men and women. Understanding one's sexual dimension of life would also be helpful.