In: Statistics and Probability
The following data were obtained in a study using three separate samples to compare three different treatments.
Treatment 1 |
Treatment 2 |
Treatment 3 |
|
4 |
3 |
8 |
|
3 |
1 |
4 |
|
5 4 |
3 1 |
6 6 |
|
M = 4 |
M = 2 |
M = 6 |
|
SS = 2 |
SS = 4 |
SS = 8 |
|
a. State the null and alternative hypotheses.
b. Fill in the ANOVA table below.
Source |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
Between treatments |
||||
Within treatments |
||||
Total |
c. If α = .05 and the Fcritical value = 4.26., what decision would you make?
d. Calculate Tukey’s HSD, with a q = 3.95.
e. Interpret which means are significantly different from each other based on Tukey’s HSD.
f. Interpret the results in paragraph form as if you were reporting them for a journal article. Attempt to use APA style.
Solution
Final answers in the required format are given below. Back-up Theory and Details of calculations follow at the end.
Part (a)
Null and alternative hypotheses:
H0: α1 = α2 = α3 0 Vs Alternative: H1: at least one αi is different from other αi’s. Answer 1
Part (b)
ANOVA Table
Source |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
Between treatments |
32 |
2 |
16 |
10.28571 |
Within treatments |
14 |
9 |
1.5556 |
|
Total |
46 |
11 |
Answer
Part (c)
Since F > Fcritical value, H0 is rejected. Hence we conclude that the mean effect is different among the three treatments. Answer 3
Part (d)
Tukey’s HSD
Test Statistic
Q = (ML - MS)/√(MSw/n),
Where
ML = Larger of the two means being compared
MS = Smaller of the two means being compared
MSw = Mean Sum of Squares of Within (Error) in ANOVA
n = Number of observations per treatment in ANOVA (must be the same for all treatments)
Critical Value
The Studentized range statistic (q)* whose value is given to be 3.95
Decision
Reject null hypothesis of equal means if Qobs > qcrit.
Calculations
MSw (MSE) |
1.5556 |
df |
14 |
n |
5 |
k |
4 |
SE =√(MSw/n) |
0.5578 |
qcrit(14,3,0.05) |
3.85 |
α |
0.05 |
||
Comparison |
Larger Mean |
Smaller Mean |
D = Difference |
Q = D/SE |
Significance |
||
1 vs 2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
3.585635 |
no |
||
1 vs 3 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
3.585635 |
No |
||
2 vs 3 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
7.171269 |
yes |
Answer 4
Part (e)
The difference between only Treatment 2 and Treatment 3 is significant. Answer 5
Back-up Theory and Details of calculations
Suppose we have data of a 1-way classification ANOVA, with r rows, and n observations per cell.
Let xij represent the jth observation in the ith row, j = 1,2,…,n; i = 1,2,……,r
Then the ANOVA model is: xij = µ + αi + εij, where µ = common effect, αi = effect of ith row, and εij is the error component which is assumed to be Normally Distributed with mean 0 and variance σ2.
Hypotheses:
Null hypothesis: H0: α1 = α2 = ….. = αr = 0 Vs Alternative: H1: at least one αi is different from other αi’s.
Now, to work out the solution,
Terminology:
Row total = xi.= sum over j of xij
Grand total = G = sum over i of xi.
Correction Factor = C = G2/N, where N = total number of observations = r x n
Total Sum of Squares: SST = (sum over i,j of xij2) – C
Row Sum of Squares: SSR = {(sum over i of xi.2)/n} – C
Error Sum of Squares: SSE = SST – SSR
Mean Sum of Squares = Sum of squares/Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of Freedom:
Total: N (i.e., rn) – 1;
Rows: (r - 1);
Error: Total - Row
Fobs: MSR/MSE;
Fcrit: upper α% point of F-Distribution with degrees of freedom n1 and n2, where n1 is the DF for the numerator MS and n2 is the DF for the denominator MS of Fobs
Significance: Fobs is significant if Fobs > Fcrit
Calculations
i |
xij |
xi. |
sumxij^2 |
|||
1 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
16 |
66 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
8 |
20 |
3 |
8 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
24 |
152 |
G |
48 |
C |
192 |
SST |
46 |
SSR |
32 |
SSE |
14 |
DONE