In: Statistics and Probability
Researchers in mental health fields are often interested in evaluating the effectiveness of using food images to enhance positive mood. Adapting a typical design from such studies, suppose we have participants rate their mood change on a standard self-report affect scale after viewing images of "comfort" foods, fruits/vegetables (F/V), and random non-food images (used as a control group). The results are given in the table at right for this hypothetical study.
| Images | ||
|---|---|---|
| Control | F/V | 
Comfort Foods  | 
| 0 | 0 | 3 | 
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 
| 3 | 2 | 5 | 
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 
(a) Complete the F-table. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
| 
Source of Variation  | 
SS | df | MS | Fobt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between groups  | 
||||
| Between persons  | 
||||
| Within groups (error)  | 
||||
| Total | 
(b) Compute a Bonferroni procedure and interpret the results.
(Assume experimentwise alpha equal to 0.05. Select all that
apply.)
Participants rated a significantly larger mood change after viewing images of comfort foods compared with the mood change after viewing images of fruits/vegetables. Participants rated a significantly larger mood change after viewing images of fruits/vegetables compared with the mood change after viewing control images. Participants rated a significantly larger mood change after viewing images of comfort foods compared with the mood change after viewing control images. There were no significant differences between any of the groups.
a)
| Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication | ||||||
| SUMMARY | Count | Sum | Average | Variance | ||
| subject 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3.000 | ||
| subject 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1.000 | ||
| subject 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1.000 | ||
| subject 4 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 2.333 | ||
| subject 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.333 | ||
| subject 6 | ||||||
| Control | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1.700 | ||
| F/V | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0.700 | ||
| comfort foods | 5 | 13 | 3 | 3.300 | ||
| ANOVA | ||||||
| Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit | 
| Rows | 16.40 | 4 | 4 | 5.125 | 0.0241 | 3.84 | 
| Columns | 8.93 | 2 | 4 | 5.583 | 0.0304 | 4.46 | 
| Error | 6.40 | 8 | 1 | |||
| Total | 31.73 | 14 | ||||
a)
| Source of Variation  | 
SS | df | MS | Fobt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between groups  | 
8.93 | 2 | 4.47 | 5.58 | 
| Between persons  | 
16.40 | 4 | 4.10 | 5.13 | 
| Within groups (error)  | 
6.40 | 8 | 0.80 | |
| Total | 31.73 | 14 | 
b)
| Level of significance | 0.05/3 = 0.0167 | 
| Numerator d.f. | 3 | 
| Denominator d.f. | 8 | 
| MSE | 0.80 | 
| t-critical value,t(α/2,df) | 3.0158 | 
critical value=tα/2,df √(MSE(1/ni+1/nj))
if absolute difference of means > critical value,means are
significnantly different ,otherwise not  
           
       
          
           
| population mean difference | critical value | result | |||||
| µ1-µ2 | 0.40 | 1.71 | means are not different | ||||
| µ1-µ3 | 1.80 | 1.71 | means are different | ||||
| µ2-µ3 | 1.40 | 1.71 | means are not different | ||||
b)
participants rated a significantly larger mood change after viewing images of comfort foods compared with the mood change after viewing control images.