In: Statistics and Probability
Researchers in mental health fields are often interested in evaluating the effectiveness of using food images to enhance positive mood. Adapting a typical design from such studies, suppose we have participants rate their mood change on a standard self-report affect scale after viewing images of "comfort" foods, fruits/vegetables (F/V), and random non-food images (used as a control group). The results are given in the table at right for this hypothetical study.
Images | ||
---|---|---|
Control | F/V |
Comfort Foods |
0 | 0 | 3 |
0 | 1 | 2 |
1 | 2 | 3 |
3 | 2 | 5 |
0 | 1 | 0 |
(a) Complete the F-table. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
Source of Variation |
SS | df | MS | Fobt |
---|---|---|---|---|
Between groups |
||||
Between persons |
||||
Within groups (error) |
||||
Total |
(b) Compute a Bonferroni procedure and interpret the results.
(Assume experimentwise alpha equal to 0.05. Select all that
apply.)
Participants rated a significantly larger mood change after viewing images of comfort foods compared with the mood change after viewing images of fruits/vegetables. Participants rated a significantly larger mood change after viewing images of fruits/vegetables compared with the mood change after viewing control images. Participants rated a significantly larger mood change after viewing images of comfort foods compared with the mood change after viewing control images. There were no significant differences between any of the groups.
a)
Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication | ||||||
SUMMARY | Count | Sum | Average | Variance | ||
subject 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3.000 | ||
subject 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1.000 | ||
subject 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1.000 | ||
subject 4 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 2.333 | ||
subject 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.333 | ||
subject 6 | ||||||
Control | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1.700 | ||
F/V | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0.700 | ||
comfort foods | 5 | 13 | 3 | 3.300 | ||
ANOVA | ||||||
Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit |
Rows | 16.40 | 4 | 4 | 5.125 | 0.0241 | 3.84 |
Columns | 8.93 | 2 | 4 | 5.583 | 0.0304 | 4.46 |
Error | 6.40 | 8 | 1 | |||
Total | 31.73 | 14 |
a)
Source of Variation |
SS | df | MS | Fobt |
---|---|---|---|---|
Between groups |
8.93 | 2 | 4.47 | 5.58 |
Between persons |
16.40 | 4 | 4.10 | 5.13 |
Within groups (error) |
6.40 | 8 | 0.80 | |
Total | 31.73 | 14 |
b)
Level of significance | 0.05/3 = 0.0167 |
Numerator d.f. | 3 |
Denominator d.f. | 8 |
MSE | 0.80 |
t-critical value,t(α/2,df) | 3.0158 |
critical value=tα/2,df √(MSE(1/ni+1/nj))
if absolute difference of means > critical value,means are
significnantly different ,otherwise not
population mean difference | critical value | result | |||||
µ1-µ2 | 0.40 | 1.71 | means are not different | ||||
µ1-µ3 | 1.80 | 1.71 | means are different | ||||
µ2-µ3 | 1.40 | 1.71 | means are not different |
b)
participants rated a significantly larger mood change after viewing images of comfort foods compared with the mood change after viewing control images.