In: Biology
please answer all the questions for microbiology :
1. Be able to draw and/or identify general bacterial cell shapes
and cell organizations
2. Know how to do a streak for isolation, and a spread plate and why you would do each
3. how to do a Gram stain, Endospore stain and acid fast stain and why you would do each.
4. Know the tools of the microbiologist and what they are used for
5. Be able to explain the results of the hand-wash experiment
6. Be able to identify and describe the results of the antiseptics/disinfectants, antibiotics experiment and interpret the results
7. Know what aseptic technique is and how to exhibit aseptic technique
1. On the basis of their morphology and shape bacteria can be categorized as: Unicellular Bacteria,Spirochaetes, Myxobacteria and Filamentous Bacteria (Actinomycetes).
Unicellular bacteria are further divided into-
2.
Procedure of Spread Plate Technique
Uses of Spread Plate Technique
Procedure
Importance of streaking
3
Gram Stain Procedure
.
Procedure of endospore stain:
Procedure of Acid-Fast Stain
Petri Dishes
In order to run their tests, scientists need samples of microorganisms, and they need containers in which to hold and study them. Cultures of bacteria are placed in petri dishes or on plates. These containers are made of clear acrylic, circular in shape, with a lip around the edge to prevent a culture from spreading outside the dish. Petri plates also have clear acrylic lids as some bacteria produce airborne spores that travel through our atmosphere and, if breathed in, can be harmful.
Agar
Agar is a food or gel substance added to petri dishes to provide nutrients that bacteria need to grow. Agar can be one of several different materials used for this purpose, including blood, chocolate, and tryptic soy.
Other Culture Tools
To move culture materials, scientists use one or more other tools. One of these tools is called a swab or loop. The loop is a thin metal rod, several inches long with a small metal loop attached at the end. The loop is swiped across the culture to collect microbes to be transferred to another agar-filled petri dish. Pipettes are also used, but instead of removing microbes with a scrape, they have light suction power. The top of the pipette is squeezed while the bottom is placed in the culture. When the top is let go, suction power sucks up microbes into the pipette's hollow shaft.
Microscope
Powerful laboratory microscopes allow microbiologists to examine their cultures at close range since the human eye is obviously limited when it comes to seeing bacteria growing or moving. There are specialized microscopes that help scientists study even the smallest of viruses, such as electron and fluorescent microscopes.
5.
The results demonstrate that handwashing with non-antibacterial soap is much more effective in removing bacteria from hands than handwashing with water only. Although handwashing with water alone reduced the presence of bacteria on hands substantially, the study supports the policy of many current hand hygiene campaigns promoting the use of soap . The strong association between hand hygiene method and bacterial contamination of hands found in our study suggests that the prevalence of faecal indicator bacteria may also be used to monitor changes in hygiene behaviour in the general population, for example following hygiene promotion campaigns.
Hygiene behaviour is difficult to measure because people tend to change their behaviour under observation or over-report desired practices . Results were positive for bacteria of potential faecal origin were more common in people frequently shaking hands, reporting soil contact or those scoring low on a hygiene score based on self-report [9]. The microbiological method used in this and our earlier studies is relatively simple
6. Results of the antiseptics/disinfectants
It is clear that microorganisms can adapt to a variety of environmental physical and chemical conditions, and it is therefore not surprising that resistance to extensively used antiseptics and disinfectants has been reported. Of the mechanisms that have been studied, the most significant are clearly intrinsic, in particular the ability to sporulate, adaptation of pseudomonads, and the protective effects of biofilms. In these cases, “resistance” may be incorrectly used and “tolerance,” defined as developmental or protective effects that permit microorganisms to survive in the presence of an active agent, may be more correct. Many of these reports of resistance have often paralleled issues including inadequate cleaning, incorrect product use, or ineffective infection control practices, which cannot be underestimated. Some acquired mechanisms (in particular with heavy-metal resistance) have also been shown to be clinically significant, but in most cases the results have been speculative. Increased MICs have been confirmed, in particular for staphylococci. However, few reports have further investigated increased bactericidal concentrations or actual use dilutions of products, which in many cases contain significantly higher concentrations of biocides, or formulation attributes, which can increase product efficacy; in a number of cases, changes in the MICs have actually been shown not to be significant . Efflux mechanisms are known to be important in antibiotic resistance, but it is questionable if the observed increased MICs of biocides could have clinical implications for hard-surface or topical disinfection. It has been speculated that low-level resistance may aid in the survival of microorganisms at residual levels of antiseptics and disinfectants; any possible clinical significance of this remains to be tested. With growing concerns about the development of biocide resistance and cross-resistance with antibiotics, it is clear that clinical isolates should be under continual surveillance and possible mechanisms should be investigated.
It is also clear that antiseptic and disinfectant products can vary significantly, despite containing similar levels of biocides, which underlines the need for close inspection of efficacy claims and adequate test methodology. In addition, a particular antiseptic or disinfectant product may be better selected (as part of infection control practices) based on particular circumstances or nosocomial outbreaks; for example, certain active agents are clearly more efficacious against gram-positive than gram-negative bacteria, and C. difficile (despite the intrinsic resistance of spores) may be effectively controlled physically by adequate cleaning with QAC-based products.
In conclusion, a great deal remains to be learned about the mode of action of antiseptics and disinfectants. Although significant progress has been made with bacterial investigations, a greater understanding of these mechanisms is clearly lacking for other infectious agents. Studies of the mechanisms of action of and microbial resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants are thus not merely of academic significance. They are associated with the more efficient use of these agents clinically and with the potential design of newer, more effective compounds and products.
Results of antibiotics
Like the older criteria that were in use up to the present, the new EUCAST/DIN criteria for the assessment of antibiotic effectiveness in the tripartite classification scheme—"susceptible," "intermediate," and "resistant"—are independent of the particular indication for which the antibiotic is to be used. For a number of drugs, however, the indications for which the drug is approved will have an influence on the breakpoints. Thus, an antibiotic that has been approved solely for the treatment of urinary tract infections should be assessed differently from one that is also used to treat respiratory tract infections. When the breakpoints were set for Neisseria meningitidis, for example, account was taken of the fact that this organism usually causes an infection in the central nervous system. The new standards (ISO, EUCAST/DIN) introduce a new level of complexity to the determination of antibiotic resistance of infectious microorganisms. The newly standardized breakpoints across Europe will, however, improve the reliability of categorization as "susceptible," "intermediate," and "resistant." This in no way relieves treating physicians of the duty to consider the available therapeutic options carefully when prescribing antibiotics.
7.
Sterile work area
The simplest and most economical way to reduce contamination from airborne particles and aerosols (e.g., dust, spores, shed skin, sneezing) is to use a cell culture hood.
Good personal hygiene
Wash your hands before and after working with cell
cultures.
In addition to protecting you from hazardous materials, wearing
personal protective equipment also reduces the probability of
contamination from shed skin as well as dirt and dust from your
clothes.
Sterile reagents & media
Commercial reagents and media undergo strict quality control to ensure their sterility, but they can become contaminated while handling. Follow the guidelines below for sterile handling to avoid contaminating them. Always sterilize any reagents, media, or solutions prepared in the laboratory using the appropriate sterilization procedure (e.g., autoclave, sterile filter).
Sterile handling