Question

In: Accounting

Cornerstone Exercise 6.10 (Algorithmic) Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent...

Cornerstone Exercise 6.10 (Algorithmic) Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December, as shown below. Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units completed 41,000 41,000 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 14,000 × 100% direct materials 14,000 — 14,000 × 45% conversion materials — 6,300 Eqivalent units of output 55,000 47,300 Costs: Work in process, December 1: Direct materials $68,000 Conversion costs 14,000 Total work in process $82,000 Current costs: Direct materials $550,000 Conversion costs 180,000 Total current costs $730,000 Required: 1. Calculate the unit cost for December, using the weighted average method. Do NOT round interim calculations and, if required, round your answer to the nearest cent. $ per equivalent unit 2. Calculate the cost of goods transferred out, calculate the cost of EWIP, and reconcile the costs assigned with the costs to account for. Cost of goods transferred out: Units completed $ Cost of EWIP Total costs assigned (accounted for) $ Reconciliation Cost to account for: BWIP $ Current (December) Total $ 3. What if you were asked to show that the weighted average unit cost for materials is the blend of the November unit materials cost and the December unit materials cost? The November unit materials cost is $4.86 ($68,000/14,000), and the December unit materials cost is $13.41 ($550,000/41,000). The equivalent units in BWIP are 14,000, and the FIFO equivalent units are 41,000. Calculate the weighted average unit materials cost using weights defined as the proportion of total units completed from each source (BWIP output and current output). Do NOT round interim calculations and, if required, round your answer to the nearest cent. $ per unit

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution 1:
Computation of Cost per equivalent unit of Production - Weighted Average
Particulars Material Conversion
Opening WIP 68000 14000
Cost Added during December 550000 180000
Total cost to be accounted for 618000 194000
Equivalent units of production 55000 47300
Cost per Equivalent unit 11.23636364 4.101479915
11.24 4.1
Solution 2:
Computation of Cost of ending WIP and units completed & transferred out - Weighted Average
Particulars Material Conversion Total
Equivalent unit of Ending WIP 14000 6300
Cost per equivalent unit 11.24 4.1
Cost of Ending WIP (Equivalent unit * Cost per equivalent unit) 157360 25830 183190
Units completed and transferred 41000 41000
Cost of units completed & Transferred (Unit completed * cost per equivalent unit) 460840 168100 628940
Cost reconciliation - Weighted Average
Particulars Amount
Costs to be accounted for:
Cost of beginning WIP inventory 82000
Cost added to production 730000
Total Cost to be accounted for 812000
Costs accounted for as follows:
Cost of unit transferred out 628940
Ending WIP:
Material 157360
Converison 25830
Total cost accounted for 812130
Solution 3:
Weighted average unit material cost = $4.86 * 14000 / 55000 + $13.41 * 41000 / 55000 = $11.23 per unit

Formula :

Solution 1:
Computation of Cost per equivalent unit of Production - Weighted Average
Particulars Material Conversion
Opening WIP 68000 14000
Cost Added during December 550000 180000
Total cost to be accounted for =B5+B6 =C5+C6
Equivalent units of production 55000 47300
Cost per Equivalent unit =B8/B9 =C8/C9
11.24 4.1
Solution 2:
Computation of Cost of ending WIP and units completed & transferred out - Weighted Average
Particulars Material Conversion Total
Equivalent unit of Ending WIP 14000 6300
Cost per equivalent unit 11.24 4.1
Cost of Ending WIP (Equivalent unit * Cost per equivalent unit) =B16*B17 =C16*C17 =B18+C18
Units completed and transferred 41000 41000
Cost of units completed & Transferred (Unit completed * cost per equivalent unit) =B17*B19 =C17*C19 =B20+C20
Cost reconciliation - Weighted Average
Particulars Amount
Costs to be accounted for:
Cost of beginning WIP inventory 82000
Cost added to production 730000
Total Cost to be accounted for =B25+B27
Costs accounted for as follows:
Cost of unit transferred out =D20
Ending WIP:
Material =B18
Converison =C18
Total cost accounted for =B32+B34+B35

Related Solutions

Cornerstone Exercise 6.10 (Algorithmic) Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent...
Cornerstone Exercise 6.10 (Algorithmic) Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December, as shown below. Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units completed 43,000 43,000 Add: Units in ending work in process ×      Percentage complete:         15,000 × 100% direct materials 15,000 —         15,000 × 45% conversion materials — 6,750 Eqivalent units of output 58,000 49,750 Costs:         Work in process, December...
eBook Cornerstone Exercise 6.10 (Algorithmic) Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the...
eBook Cornerstone Exercise 6.10 (Algorithmic) Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December, as shown below. Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units completed 46,000 46,000 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 20,000 × 100% direct materials 20,000 — 20,000 × 45% conversion materials — 9,000 Eqivalent units of output 66,000 55,000 Costs: Work in process, December 1: Direct materials...
Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent units schedule and cost...
Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December, as shown below. Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units completed 44,000 44,000 Add: Units in ending work in process ×      Percentage complete:         19,000 × 100% direct materials 19,000 —         19,000 × 45% conversion materials — 8,550 Eqivalent units of output 63,000 52,550 Costs:         Work in process, December 1:           Direct materials...
Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent units schedule and cost...
Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December, as shown below. Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units completed 48,000 48,000 Add: Units in ending work in process ×      Percentage complete:         17,000 × 100% direct materials 17,000 —         17,000 × 40% conversion materials — 6,800 Eqivalent units of output 65,000 54,800 Costs:         Work in process, December 1:           Direct materials...
Cornerstone Exercise 6.8 (Algorithmic) Cost Information and FIFO Gunnison Company had the following equivalent units schedule...
Cornerstone Exercise 6.8 (Algorithmic) Cost Information and FIFO Gunnison Company had the following equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December: Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units started and completed 40,000 40,000 Add: Units in beginning work in process × Percentage complete: 6,000 × 0% direct materials — 6,000 × 50% conversion Costs 3,000 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 11,000 × 100% direct materials 11,000 — 11,000 × 35%...
Exercise 4-3 Cost Per Equivalent Unit-Weighted-Average Method [LO4-3] Superior Micro Products uses the weighted-average method in...
Exercise 4-3 Cost Per Equivalent Unit-Weighted-Average Method [LO4-3] Superior Micro Products uses the weighted-average method in its process costing system. Data for the Assembly Department for May appear below: Materials Labor Overhead   Work in process, May 1 $ 40,600   $ 68,409   $ 331,872     Cost added during May $ 246,530   $ 45,606   $ 221,248     Equivalent units of production 3,400   3,300   3,200   Required: 1. Compute the cost per equivalent unit for materials, for labor, and for overhead. (Round your answers to 2...
Cornerstone Exercise 14.4 (Algorithmic) Long-Term Performance Report Nabors Company had actual quality costs for the year...
Cornerstone Exercise 14.4 (Algorithmic) Long-Term Performance Report Nabors Company had actual quality costs for the year ended June 30, 2015, as given below. Prevention costs:    Prototype inspection $ 290,000    Vendor certification 580,000      Total prevention costs $ 870,000 Appraisal costs:    Process acceptance $ 305,000    Test labor 350,000      Total Appraisal costs $ 655,000 Internal failure costs:    Retesting $ 182,500    Rework 365,000      Total internal failure costs $ 547,500 External failure costs:    Recalls $ 266,750    Product liability 543,500      Total external failure costs $ 810,250...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT