In: Accounting
Clean Chips is a manufacturer of prototype chips based in?
Dublin, Ireland. Next? year, in 2015?, Clean Chips expects to
deliver 622 prototype chips at an average price of $ 110000.
Clean ?Chips' marketing vice president forecasts growth of 85
prototype chips per year through 2021.
That? is, demand will be 622 in 2015?, 707 in 2016?, 792 in 2017?,
and so on.
The plant cannot produce more than 597 prototype chips
annually.
To meet future? demand, Clean Chips must either modernize the plant
or replace it.
The old equipment is fully depreciated and can be sold for $
4100000 if the plant is replaced.
If the plant is? modernized, the costs to modernize it are to be
capitalized and depreciated over the useful life of the updated
plant.
The old equipment is retained as part of the modernize alternative.
The following data on the two options are? available:
Modernize |
Replace |
||
Initial investment in 2015 |
$37,100,000 |
$62,500,000 |
|
Terminal disposal value in 2021 |
$6,800,000 |
$15,500,000 |
|
Useful life |
7 years |
7 years |
|
Total annual cash operating cost per prototype chip |
$93,000 |
$85,000 |
CleanCleanChips uses? straight-line depreciation, assuming zero terminal disposal value. For? simplicity, we assume no change in prices or costs in future years. The investment will be made at the beginning of2015?,and all transactions thereafter occur on the last day of the year.
CleanClean?Chips' required rate of return is6?%.There is no difference between the modernize and replace alternatives in terms of required working capital.
CleanCleanChips has a special waiver on income taxes until2021.
1. |
Sketch the cash inflows and outflows of the modernize and replace alternatives over the2015-2021period. |
2. |
Calculate payback period for the modernize and replace alternatives. |
3. |
Calculate net present value of the modernize and replace alternatives. |
4. |
What factors shouldCleanCleanChips consider in choosing between the?alternatives? |
(1) Cash Inflows & Outflows :-
Modernize |
||||||||
Particulars |
Year 0 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
Year 6 |
Year 7 |
Clean chips deliver (A) |
622 |
707 |
792 |
877 |
962 |
1047 |
1132 |
|
Average price |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
|
Operating cost per prototype |
-93000 |
-93000 |
-93000 |
-93000 |
-93000 |
-93000 |
-93000 |
|
Cash inflow per prototype (B) |
17000 |
17000 |
17000 |
17000 |
17000 |
17000 |
17000 |
|
Cash inflow from prototype (A*B) |
10574000 |
12019000 |
13464000 |
14909000 |
16354000 |
17799000 |
19244000 |
|
Initial Investment |
-37100000 |
|||||||
Terminal Disposal Value |
6800000 |
|||||||
Total Cash Inflow/Outflow |
-37100000 |
10574000 |
12019000 |
13464000 |
14909000 |
16354000 |
17799000 |
26044000 |
Replace |
||||||||
Particulars |
Year 0 |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 |
Year 5 |
Year 6 |
Year 7 |
Clean chips deliver (A) |
622 |
707 |
792 |
877 |
962 |
1047 |
1132 |
|
Average price |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
|
Operating cost per prototype |
-85000 |
-85000 |
-85000 |
-85000 |
-85000 |
-85000 |
-85000 |
|
Cash inflow per prototype (B) |
25000 |
25000 |
25000 |
25000 |
25000 |
25000 |
25000 |
|
Cash inflow from prototype(A*B) |
15550000 |
17675000 |
19800000 |
21925000 |
24050000 |
26175000 |
28300000 |
|
Initial Investment |
-62500000 |
|||||||
Sale value of old machinery |
4100000 |
|||||||
Terminal Disposal Value |
15500000 |
|||||||
Total Cash Inflow/Outflow |
-58400000 |
15550000 |
17675000 |
19800000 |
21925000 |
24050000 |
26175000 |
43800000 |
(2) Payback Period:-
Modernise |
Replace |
||||
|
Cash Inflow |
Cash Inflow (–) Cash Outflow |
|
Cash Inflow |
Cash Inflow (–) Cash Outflow |
Year 0 |
-37100000 |
Year 0 |
-58400000 |
||
Year 1 |
10574000 |
-26526000 |
Year 1 |
15550000 |
-42850000 |
Year 2 |
12019000 |
-14507000 |
Year 2 |
17675000 |
-25175000 |
Year 3 |
13464000 |
-1043000 |
Year 3 |
19800000 |
-5375000 |
Year 4 |
14909000 |
13866000 |
Year 4 |
21925000 |
16550000 |
Year 5 |
16354000 |
30220000 |
Year 5 |
24050000 |
40600000 |
Year 6 |
17799000 |
48019000 |
Year 6 |
26175000 |
66775000 |
Year 7 |
26044000 |
74063000 |
Year 7 |
43800000 |
110575000 |
Payback period for Modernise = 3 year + 1043000/14909000 = 3.07 years
Payback period for Replace = 3 year + 5375000/21925000= 3.245 years
(3) NPV:-
Modernise |
|||
Cash flows |
PV Factor @ 6% |
PV of cash flows |
|
Year 0 |
-37100000 |
1 |
-37100000 |
Year 1 |
10574000 |
0.943396226 |
9975471.698 |
Year 2 |
12019000 |
0.88999644 |
10696867.21 |
Year 3 |
13464000 |
0.839619283 |
11304634.03 |
Year 4 |
14909000 |
0.792093663 |
11809324.43 |
Year 5 |
16354000 |
0.747258173 |
12220660.16 |
Year 6 |
17799000 |
0.70496054 |
12547592.66 |
Year 7 |
26044000 |
0.665057114 |
17320747.47 |
NPV |
48775297.65 |
Replace |
|||
Cash flows |
PV Factor @ 6% |
PV of cash flows |
|
Year 0 |
-58400000 |
1 |
-58400000 |
Year 1 |
15550000 |
0.943396226 |
14669811.32 |
Year 2 |
17675000 |
0.88999644 |
15730687.08 |
Year 3 |
19800000 |
0.839619283 |
16624461.8 |
Year 4 |
21925000 |
0.792093663 |
17366653.57 |
Year 5 |
24050000 |
0.747258173 |
17971559.06 |
Year 6 |
26175000 |
0.70496054 |
18452342.15 |
Year 7 |
43800000 |
0.665057114 |
29129501.58 |
NPV |
71545016.55 |
(4)
Modernise |
Replace |
|
Payback Period |
3.07 years |
3.245 years |
NPV |
48775297.65 |
71545016.55 |
Modernise is better as per Payback period
Replace is better as per NPV method
If company wants to recover its Initial Investment earlier then Modernise is better
But in Replace alternative , Initial Investment is very high as compare to Modernise alternative.
Hence its Payback period is more.But in this alternative Cash inflows are also high.Thats why its NPV is more than Modernise.