Question

In: Math

use the two-phase method and big.M method to solve the LPP: min z=x1-2x2 st: x1+x2>=2 -x1+x2>=1...

use the two-phase method and big.M method to solve the LPP: min z=x1-2x2 st: x1+x2>=2 -x1+x2>=1 x2<=3 x1,x2>=0 (two method!)

Solutions

Expert Solution

Given primal problem is :

Min z = x1-2x2

St : x1+x2 2

-x1+x2 1

x2 3

x1,x2 0

TWO PHASE METHOD

After introducing x3,x4 as surplus variables and x5 as slack variable and x6, x7 as artificial variables, the constraint equations become,

x1+x2-x3+0x4+0x5+x6+0x7 = 2

-x1+x2+0x3-x4+0x5+0x6+x7 = 1

x2+0x3+0x4+x5+0x6+0x7 = 3

x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7 0

The auxiliary objective function to be minimized is given by

z' = 0x1+0x2+0x3+0x4+0x5-x6-x7

Subject to the above system of equations.

Here x1,x2,x3,x4,x5 are the legitimatevariables and x6,x7 are the artificial variables.

We then construct the simplex tableaux successively and obtain

Phase I :

cj 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -1
cB B xB b a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7
-1 a6 x6 2 1 1 -1 0 0 1 0
-1 a7 x7 1 -1 1 0 -1 0 0 1
0 a5 x5 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
0 -2 1 1 0 0 0
-1 a6 x6 1 2 0 -1 1 0 1
0 a2 x2 1 -1 1 0 -1 0 0
0 a5 x5 2 1 0 0 1 1 0
-2 0 1 -1 0 0
0 a1 x1 1/2 1 0 -1/2 1/2 0
0 a2 x2 3/2 0 1 -1/2 -1/2 0
0 a5 x5 3/2 0 -1 1/2 1/2 1
0 0 0 0 0

Here zj-cj 0 in this iteration and Min z' = 0. No artificial variable appears in the final tableau of phase I. We then pass on to the phase II where the objective function to be minimized is z = x1-2x2+0x3+0x4+0x5.

The last basis of phase I will be the starting basis for phase II and the last tableau of phase I will act as the initial tableau of phase II with a change only in the objective row containing the prices. cB column being changed accordingly, there will be a new index row showing zj-cj in the initial tableau of phase II. As there is no artificial vector in the basis of the last tableau of phase I, we forget about it and delete this column.

Phase II :

cj 1 -2 0 0 0
cB B xB b a1 a2 a3 a4 a5
1 a1 x1 1/2 1 0 -1/2 1/2 0
-2 a2 x2 3/2 0 1 -1/2 -1/2 0
0 a5 x5 3/2 0 -1 1/2 1/2 1
0 0 1/2 3/2 0

Here zj-cj 0, for all j. The optimality condition has been satisfied. The optimal solution is :

x1 = 1/2, x2 = 3/2 and zmin = (1/2)-2*(3/2) = -5/2.


Related Solutions

Find dual from primal conversion MIN Z = x1 - 2x2 subject to 4x1 - x2 >= 8 2x1 + x2 >= 10 -x1 + x2 <= 7 and x1,x2 >= 0
Find dual from primal conversion MIN Z = x1 - 2x2 subject to 4x1 - x2 >= 8 2x1 + x2 >= 10 -x1 + x2 = 0
Solve the following problem by the dual simplex method. Min Z = 2 x1 + 3...
Solve the following problem by the dual simplex method. Min Z = 2 x1 + 3 x2 subject to 2 x1 + 2 x2 <=  30 x1 + 2 x2 >=10 x1 0, x2 >=0
Solve the following problems using the two phase method: max 3x1 + x2 S.t. x1 −...
Solve the following problems using the two phase method: max 3x1 + x2 S.t. x1 − x2 ≤ −1 −x1 − x2 ≤ −3 2x1 + x2 ≤ 4 x1, x2 ≥ 0 Please show all steps
use newton raphson method to solve the following system of nonlinear equations x1^2+x2^2=50 ; x1*x2=25 stop...
use newton raphson method to solve the following system of nonlinear equations x1^2+x2^2=50 ; x1*x2=25 stop after three iterations. initial guess : (x1,x2) = (2,1)
MAXIMIZATION BY THE SIMPLEX METHOD Maximize z = x1 + 2x2 + x3 subject to x1...
MAXIMIZATION BY THE SIMPLEX METHOD Maximize z = x1 + 2x2 + x3 subject to x1 + x2 ≤ 3 x2 + x3 ≤ 4 x1 + x3 ≤ 5 x1, x2, x3 ≥0
Amy has utility function u (x1, x2) = min { 2*(x1)^2*x2, x1*(x2)^2 }. Derive Amy's demand...
Amy has utility function u (x1, x2) = min { 2*(x1)^2*x2, x1*(x2)^2 }. Derive Amy's demand function for x1 and x2. For what values (if any) of m, p1, and p2 are the goods gross complements or gross substitutes of each other?
Exercise Minimize            Z = X1 - 2X2 Subject to            X1 - 2X2 ≥ 4            &
Exercise Minimize            Z = X1 - 2X2 Subject to            X1 - 2X2 ≥ 4                             X1 + X2 ≤ 8                            X1, X2 ≥ 0
u(x1, x2) = min {x1/2, x2/3} if the price of good 1 is $7/unit, the price...
u(x1, x2) = min {x1/2, x2/3} if the price of good 1 is $7/unit, the price of good 2 is $4/unit and income is 114.. What is this person's optimal consumption level for good 2?
1. Solve linear system using Gaussian elimination a) x1 + 2x2 + x3 = 2 -x1...
1. Solve linear system using Gaussian elimination a) x1 + 2x2 + x3 = 2 -x1 − 3x2 + 2x3 = -3   x1 − 6x2 + 3x3 = -6 b) -2b + 2c = 10 3a + 12b -3c = -6 6a + 18b + 0c = 19 c) 4x - 1y + 4z + 3t = 5 1x - 4z + 6t = 7 5x - 5y + 1z + 2t = -5 4x + 1y + 3z +...
Lauren’s utility function is uL(x1,x2) = min{x1, x2} and Humphrey’s utility function is uH (x1, x2)...
Lauren’s utility function is uL(x1,x2) = min{x1, x2} and Humphrey’s utility function is uH (x1, x2) = ?(x1) + ?(x2). Their endowments are eL = (4,8) and eH = (2,0). a) Suppose Humphrey and Lauren are to simply just consume their given endowments. State the definition of Pareto efficiency. Is this a Pareto efficient allocation? As part of answering this question, can you find an alternative allocation of the goods that Pareto dominates the allocation where Humphrey and Lauren consume...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT