Question

In: Economics

Service Households (2015) Households (Current Survey) Time Warner Cable          75,625          74,520 At&T U-Verse         ..

Service Households (2015) Households (Current Survey)
Time Warner Cable          75,625          74,520
At&T U-Verse          56,815          58,140
Dish Network          14,940          14,650
Direct TV          19,650          19,850
Google Fiber                 -             1,150
Households with Service        167,030        168,310
No Service*          16,650          17,520
Total Households        183,680        185,830

*No service indicates that the household does not currently subscribe to a multi-channel video provider. Of these households, 68.4% indicated that they did subscribe to one or more Internet-based services such as Netflix or Hulu. In the 2015 survey, the same response was 63.2%.

Question:  

According to Department of Justice guidelines, is the industry heavily concentrated? How has that changed since the 2015 survey?

Solutions

Expert Solution

To calculate the degree of concentration of service providers, we have calculated N-firm concentration ratio as well as Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. Using N-firm concentration index (N=3), it was found that three were serving 88.23 percent subscribers in 2015 and the share of top three firms has declined to 87.52 in the current survey. It implies that concentration has not increased during the two survey periods. Rather a marginal decline was observed in concentration.

Formula for N-firm concentration ratio:

  

Where S1, S2, and S3 are the respective market share of top three firms

Table 1: N-firm concentration Ratio

2015

Current Survey

Time Warner Cable

75625

74520

At&T U-Verse

56815

58140

Dish Network

14940

14650

Direct TV

19650

19850

Google Fiber

0

1150

Households with Service

167030

168310

No Service*

16650

17520

Total Households

183680

185830

Sum of top three service providers

147380

147310

N-firms concentration (N=3)

88.24

87.52

Note: CR3 is based on total subscribers

Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: the decline in concentration was observed using HHI also. It is visible as HHI value was 34.25 per cent in 2015 and 33.69 per cent in the current survey. HHI calculation is available in Table 2.

Formula:

Table 2: Herfindahl-Hirschman Index

2015

Sum of square of each firm(2015)

Current Survey

Sum of square of each firm(latest period)

Time Warner Cable

75625

0.205

74520

0.196

At&T U-Verse

56815

0.116

58140

0.119

Dish Network

14940

0.008

14650

0.008

Direct TV

19650

0.014

19850

0.014

Google Fiber

0

0.000

1150

0.000

Households with Service

167030

1.000

168310

1.000

No Service*

16650

17520

Total Households

183680

185830

HHI

34.25

33.69

Conclusion: The industry is not heavily concnetrated. During the two periods, concentration has marginally decreased.


Related Solutions

Service Households (2015) Households (Current Survey) Time Warner Cable          75,625          74,520 At&T U-Verse         ..
Service Households (2015) Households (Current Survey) Time Warner Cable          75,625          74,520 At&T U-Verse          56,815          58,140 Dish Network          14,940          14,650 Direct TV          19,650          19,850 Google Fiber                 -             1,150 Households with Service        167,030        168,310 No Service*          16,650          17,520 Total Households        183,680        185,830 *No service indicates that the household does not currently subscribe to a multi-channel video provider. Of these households, 68.4% indicated that they did subscribe...
Service Households (2015) Households (Current Survey) Time Warner Cable          75,625          74,520 At&T U-Verse        &nb
Service Households (2015) Households (Current Survey) Time Warner Cable          75,625          74,520 At&T U-Verse          56,815          58,140 Dish Network          14,940          14,650 Direct TV          19,650          19,850 Google Fiber                 -             1,150 Households with Service        167,030        168,310 No Service*          16,650          17,520 Total Households        183,680        185,830 *No service indicates that the household does not currently subscribe to a multi-channel video provider. Of these households, 68.4% indicated that they did subscribe...
Time Warner Cable Memo #1 We recently added the EPIX Movie Channels as part of a...
Time Warner Cable Memo #1 We recently added the EPIX Movie Channels as part of a new tier programming for our digital video subscribers. The EPIX channels are sold as an add-on package for $9.75 per month, but we would like to potentially increase our revenue from our subscriber base. Currently we have about 15,059 subscribers, generating monthly revenue of $146,823 Some have suggested we should cut price, as customers tend to be fairly price sensitive for add-on packages. However,...
According to the FDIC 2015 National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households, which of the following...
According to the FDIC 2015 National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households, which of the following individuals would be considered underbanked? Sally lives with her mother, who has a bank account.  Sally does not.  She recently received a loan from a payday loan company. Joel lives by himself and he does not have a checking or saving account. His employer pays him by loading funds on a stored-value card. He pays his rent and other bills using money orders. David lives with...
Time Warner Cable Case Study, Memo #4 . Please see below especially the first two questions...
Time Warner Cable Case Study, Memo #4 . Please see below especially the first two questions in bold 1] If we lower the price, do you think this is likely to lead to higher revenue? 2}how much potential revenue can we generate and how low should we go with our price? Time Warner Cable Case Study, Memo #4 . As you are aware, we recently added the EPIX Movie Channels as part of a new tier of programming for our...
Why does AT&T wish to acquire Time Warner? What is the benefit to the merger? Who...
Why does AT&T wish to acquire Time Warner? What is the benefit to the merger? Who loses? The U.S. government doesn’t generally get involved with vertical mergers, why is the government contesting the AT&T/Time-Warner deal, but not (at least yet) the Disney/Fox deal (although the U.K. has expressed concerns)? Do you believe AT&T should be allowed to acquire Time-Warner? If so, should they place any restrictions on the merged firm?
In survival analysis,original life time is T and mean residual life at time u is mrl(u)....
In survival analysis,original life time is T and mean residual life at time u is mrl(u). Show the following: mrl(u)=E(T-u|T>u)= [ integral(u to infinite) S(t) dt ] / S(u).
(Expected rate of return and current yield) Time Warner has bonds that are selling for $1,184....
(Expected rate of return and current yield) Time Warner has bonds that are selling for $1,184. The coupon interest rate on the bonds is 9.25 percent and they mature in 18 years. What is the yield to maturity on the bonds? What is the current yield? a. The yield to maturity on the bond is _______%. (Round to two decimal places.)
Will you explain the merger between AT&T and Time Warner? Why President Trump and his Department...
Will you explain the merger between AT&T and Time Warner? Why President Trump and his Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the participants in this merger?
Read these two articles about the AT&T Time Warner merger. What do you see as the...
Read these two articles about the AT&T Time Warner merger. What do you see as the benefits and drawbacks of this merger for both consumers and the firms? Do you think it should be approved? Why or why not? In general, do you think monopolies are good or bad for consumers? Why? The Perils of an AT&T-Time Warner Merger: Last time a communications giant acquired Time Warner, it was an unprecedented disaster. Here's what is likely to go wrong this...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT