In: Accounting
Jordan is a construction contract company involved in building commercial properties. Its current policy for determining the percentage of completion of its contracts is based on the proportion of cost incurred to date compared to the total expected cost of the contract.
One of Jordan’s contracts has an agreed price of $250 million and estimated total costs of $200 million.
The cumulative progress of this contract is:
Year ended: 30 September 2011 30 September 2012
$million $million
Costs incurred 80 145
Work certified and billed 75 160
Billings received 70 150
Based on the above, Jordan prepared and published its financial statements for the year ended 30 September 2011. Relevant extracts are:
Statement of Profit and Loss
$million
Revenue (balance) 100
Cost of sales (80)
––––
Profit (50 x 80/200) 20
––––
Statement of financial position
$million
Current assets
Amounts due from customers
Contract costs to date 80
Profit recognised 20
––––
100
Progress billings (75)
––––
25
––––
Contract receivables (75 – 70) 5
Jordan has received some adverse publicity in the financial press for taking its profit too early in the contract process, leading to disappointing profits in the later stages of contracts. Most of Jordan’s competitors take profit based on the percentage of completion as determined by the work certified compared to the contract price.
Required:
WN:-1Calculation of Percentage of Completion(Based on New Accounting Estimates):-
Work Certified=$160 million
Contract Price=$250 million
This is 64% (160/250*100)
Statement of Profit and Loss:-(For the year 2012)
Particulars | $million |
Revenue(Balance)=250*64%=160-100(Already recognised in 2011) | 60 |
Cost of Sales=200*64%=128-80(Already recognised in 2011) | 48 |
Profit | 12 |
Statement of Financial Position:-For the year 2012)
Particulars | $million |
Current Liabilities Amount Due From Customers Contract Cost to date(145-80)(A) Profit Recognised(B) |
65 12 |
(A+B) | 77 |
Progree Billing | (85) |
Amount due to customers | 8 |
Contract Recivables(85-80)=$5million
Note 1:-All the above data of one year(year ended 2012) and not cummulative for both years.cumulative data is given in question we do segregation of each and present for only year ended 2012.That is data already recognised in 2011 is segregate and net amount is recognised.
Note 2:-Change in Accounting Estimate:-It is change in acounting treatment done in past.Assuming Changes only affect the current year and future years.Prior years don not change based on the new estimate.A prior period adjustment must be used to change prior periods.