In: Accounting
Cornerstone Exercise 11.3 (Algorithmic) Deeds Company sells custom-made machine parts to industrial equipment manufacturers by bidding cost plus 40 percent, where cost is defined as manufacturing cost plus order processing cost. There are two types of customers: those who place small, frequent orders and those who place larger, less frequent orders. Cost and sales information by customer category is provided below.
Order-filling capacity is purchased in steps (order-processing clerks) of 1,000, each step costing $50,000; variable order-filling activity costs are $30 per order. The activity capacity is 43,000 orders; thus, the total order-filling cost is $3,437,000 [(43 steps × $50,000) + ($30 × 42,900)]. Current practice allocates ordering cost in proportion to the units purchased. Deeds recently lost a bid for 150 units. (The per-unit bid price was $2 per unit more than the winning bid.) The manager of Deeds was worried that this was a recurring trend for the larger orders. (Other large orders had been lost with similar margins of loss.) No such problem was taking place for the smaller orders; the company rarely lost bids on smaller orders. Required: 1. Calculate the unit bid price offered to
Deeds’s customers assuming that order-filling cost is allocated to
each customer category in proportion to units sold. Round your
answer to the nearest cent. 2. Assume that a newly implemented ABC system concludes that the number of orders placed is the best cost driver for the order-filling activity. Assign order-filling costs using this driver to each customer type and then calculate the new unit bid price for each customer type. Round the amount of order cost allocation to the nearest whole dollar. Round other computations and the bid price to the nearest cent.
Using this new price, would Deeds have won the bid for the 150 units recently lost? - Select your answer -YesNoItem 6 3. What if Deeds offers a discount for orders of 39 units or more to the frequently ordering customers? Assume that all the frequently ordering customers can and do take advantage of this offer at the minimum level possible. Compute the new order cost allocation and bid price. In your calculations, round the number of steps to the nearest whole number. Round the amount of order cost allocation to the nearest whole dollar. Round other computations and the bid price to the nearest cent.
Can Deeds offer the original price from Requirement 1 to the frequently ordering customers and not decrease its profitability? - Select your answer -YesNoItem 9 |
1…Order-filling cost is allocated to each customer category in proportion to units sold |
Total units sold= |
(39000*15)+(3900*150)= |
1170000 |
ie. 585000 + 585000 each category |
So, order cost allocation for either customer category= |
585000/1170000*3437000= |
1718500 |
So, Bid price for either category= |
(Mfg. cost+Order processing cost)*(1+Mark-up %) |
(60+(1718500/585000))*1.40= |
88.11 |
2… No. of orders placed is the best cost driver for the order-filling activity |
Order cost allocation: |
Frequently ordering customers |
39000/42900*3437000= |
3124545 |
Less Frequently ordering customer: |
3900/42900*3437000= |
312455 |
Now calculating the Bid-price for each category as in 1 above, |
For Frequently ordering customers |
(60+(3124545/585000))*1.40= |
91.48 |
for Less Frequently ordering customer: |
(60+(312455/585000))*1.40= |
84.75 |
Yes. As per the ABC costing, Deed could have won the bid, as it is almost $ 4 (88.11-84.75) less than the original bid in 1. |
3… |
Given----Assume that all the frequently ordering customers can and do take advantage of this offer |
No.of Orders for 39 units at a time = (39000*15)/39 = 15,000 (frequent order customers) |
So, now the total orders will be = 15,000 + 3,900 = 18900 |
No.of steps=18900/1,000 = 18.9 ie. 19 steps |
Order-filling cost= (19* $ 50000)+(30*18900)= $ 1517000 |
Order-filling cost allocated to the frequent category=(15,000/18900)*1517000= $1203968 |
So, Bid Price for frequent category customers=(60+(1203968/585000))*1.40= $ 86.88 |
Yes. |
As both the bid prices are almost the same, Deeds can offer the old price & quantity discounts without much decrease in profits. |