In: Accounting
Activity-Based Customer Costing
Deeds Company sells custom-made machine parts to industrial equipment manufacturers by bidding cost plus 40 percent, where cost is defined as manufacturing cost plus order processing cost. There are two types of customers: those who place small, frequent orders and those who place larger, less frequent orders. Cost and sales information by customer category is provided below.
Frequently Ordering Customers |
Less Frequently Ordering Customers |
|||||||
Sales orders | 37,000 | 3,700 | ||||||
Order size | 15 | 150 | ||||||
Average unit manufacturing cost | $45 | $45 | ||||||
Order-processing activity costs: | ||||||||
Processing sales orders | $2,878,500 |
Order-filling capacity is purchased in steps (order-processing clerks) of 1,000, each step costing $45,000; variable order-filling activity costs are $35 per order. The activity capacity is 45,000 orders; thus, the total order-filling cost is $3,449,500 [(45 steps × $45,000) + ($35 × 40,700)]. Current practice allocates ordering cost in proportion to the units purchased.
Deeds recently lost a bid for 100 units. (The per-unit bid price was $2 per unit more than the winning bid.) The manager of Deeds was worried that this was a recurring trend for the larger orders. (Other large orders had been lost with similar margins of loss.) No such problem was taking place for the smaller orders; the company rarely lost bids on smaller orders.
Required:
1. Calculate the unit bid price offered to
Deeds’s customers assuming that order-filling cost is allocated to
each customer category in proportion to units sold.
Note: Do not round interim calculations. Round
your final answer to the nearest cent.
$
2. Assume that a newly implemented ABC system concludes that the number of orders placed is the best cost driver for the order-filling activity. Assign order-filling costs using this driver to each customer type and then calculate the new unit bid price for each customer type. Note: Do not round interim calculations. Round the final order cost allocation to the nearest whole dollar. Round final bid prices to the nearest cent.
Order Cost Allocation round to whole dollar |
Bid Price round to two decimals |
|
Frequently ordering | $ | $ |
Less frequently ordering | $ | $ |
Using this new price, would Deeds have won the bid for the units
recently lost?
.Solution-
1.
Order-filling cost is allocated to each customer category in proportion to units sold |
Total units sold= |
(37,000*15)+(3,700*150)= |
1,110,000 |
i.e.,555,000+ 555,000each category |
So,order cost allocation for either customer category= |
555,000/1,110,000*3,449,500= |
1,724,750 |
So,Bid price for either category= |
(Mfg.Order Processing cost)*(1=Mark-up%) |
(45+(1,724,750/555,000))*1.40= |
67.35 |
2.
No. of orders placed is the best cost driver for the order-filling activity |
Order cost allocation: |
Frequently ordering customers |
37,000/40,700* 3,449,500= |
3,135,909 |
Less Frequently ordering customer: |
3,700/40,700* 3,449,500= |
313,591 |
Now calculating the Bid-price for each category as in 1 above, |
For Frequently ordering customers |
(45+(3135909/555,000))*1.40= |
70.91 |
for Less Frequently ordering customer: |
(45+(313591/555,000))*1.40= |
63.79 |
Yes. As per the ABC costing, Deed could have won the bid, as it is almost $ 3.5 (67.35-63.79) less than the original bid in 1. |