In: Accounting
Activity-Based Customer Costing
Deeds Company sells custom-made machine parts to industrial equipment manufacturers by bidding cost plus 40 percent, where cost is defined as manufacturing cost plus order processing cost. There are two types of customers: those who place small, frequent orders and those who place larger, less frequent orders. Cost and sales information by customer category is provided below.
| Frequently Ordering Customers  | 
Less Frequently Ordering Customers  | 
|||||||
| Sales orders | 37,000 | 3,700 | ||||||
| Order size | 15 | 150 | ||||||
| Average unit manufacturing cost | $45 | $45 | ||||||
| Order-processing activity costs: | ||||||||
| Processing sales orders | $2,878,500 | |||||||
Order-filling capacity is purchased in steps (order-processing clerks) of 1,000, each step costing $45,000; variable order-filling activity costs are $35 per order. The activity capacity is 45,000 orders; thus, the total order-filling cost is $3,449,500 [(45 steps × $45,000) + ($35 × 40,700)]. Current practice allocates ordering cost in proportion to the units purchased.
Deeds recently lost a bid for 100 units. (The per-unit bid price was $2 per unit more than the winning bid.) The manager of Deeds was worried that this was a recurring trend for the larger orders. (Other large orders had been lost with similar margins of loss.) No such problem was taking place for the smaller orders; the company rarely lost bids on smaller orders.
Required:
1. Calculate the unit bid price offered to
Deeds’s customers assuming that order-filling cost is allocated to
each customer category in proportion to units sold.
Note: Do not round interim calculations. Round
your final answer to the nearest cent.
$
2. Assume that a newly implemented ABC system concludes that the number of orders placed is the best cost driver for the order-filling activity. Assign order-filling costs using this driver to each customer type and then calculate the new unit bid price for each customer type. Note: Do not round interim calculations. Round the final order cost allocation to the nearest whole dollar. Round final bid prices to the nearest cent.
| Order Cost Allocation round to whole dollar  | 
Bid Price round to two decimals  | 
|
| Frequently ordering | $ | $ | 
| Less frequently ordering | $ | $ | 
Using this new price, would Deeds have won the bid for the units
recently lost?
.Solution-
1.
| Order-filling cost is allocated to each customer category in proportion to units sold | 
| Total units sold= | 
| (37,000*15)+(3,700*150)= | 
| 1,110,000 | 
| i.e.,555,000+ 555,000each category | 
| So,order cost allocation for either customer category= | 
| 555,000/1,110,000*3,449,500= | 
| 1,724,750 | 
| So,Bid price for either category= | 
| (Mfg.Order Processing cost)*(1=Mark-up%) | 
| (45+(1,724,750/555,000))*1.40= | 
| 67.35 | 
2.
| No. of orders placed is the best cost driver for the order-filling activity | 
| Order cost allocation: | 
| Frequently ordering customers | 
| 37,000/40,700* 3,449,500= | 
| 3,135,909 | 
| Less Frequently ordering customer: | 
| 3,700/40,700* 3,449,500= | 
| 313,591 | 
| Now calculating the Bid-price for each category as in 1 above, | 
| For Frequently ordering customers | 
| (45+(3135909/555,000))*1.40= | 
| 70.91 | 
| for Less Frequently ordering customer: | 
| (45+(313591/555,000))*1.40= | 
| 63.79 | 
| Yes. As per the ABC costing, Deed could have won the bid, as it is almost $ 3.5 (67.35-63.79) less than the original bid in 1. |