In: Accounting
HR’s role in cultivating an ethics-friendly corporate environment can be placed into four broad categories.
1) HR professionals must help ensure that ethics is a top
organizational priority. Pat Wright, head of Cornell University’s
Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, has stated that, in the
wake of business scandals, HR leaders will take on a “bigger role
in monitoring the culture of the organization in terms of its
ethical status,” according to Human Resources Report. But
monitoring alone won’t suffice. HR executives must either take on
the mantle of ethics champion or ensure that some other capable
person in the organization does so. Such a champion will need to be
highly experienced and respected, having enough organizational
clout to make a difference.
2) HR must ensure that the leadership selection and development
processes include an ethics component. After all, leaders at all
levels of the organization need to both model ethical behavior and
communicate ethical standards to employees, suggests research
conducted by Ethics Resource Center . Selection procedures can
filter out people who, despite making their numbers, are known for
cutting ethical corners. And leadership development should include
not only ethics theory but real-life examples, perhaps from
mentors, on how managers have handled ethical dilemmas in the
past.
Among the most difficult aspects of ensuring ethical leadership may
be convincing top management, including board members, that they
too should receive ethics training. A Conference Board survey of
over 80 ethics, HR and legal officers found that only about a
quarter had held training programs for their boards of directors.
Yet, over half (55%) of these respondents said their boards are
“not engaged enough” in major ethical decisions associated with
their organizations.
Promoting gender diversity among top leadership might have a
positive impact on ethics, at least among Canadian firms, suggests
a report by The Conference Board of Canada. It showed that 94% of
boards with three or more women make sure of their organization’s
adherence to conflict-of-interest guidelines, while only 68% of
all-male boards do the same. The same survey indicated that boards
with larger numbers of women also are more likely than all-male
boards to ensure that codes of conduct are followed in their
organizations.
3)The major HR responsibility is ensuring that the right programs
and policies are in place, keeping in mind that the U.S. government
is developing a stricter set of sentencing guidelines. A news
release notes that under the U.S. guidelines first promulgated in
1991, “an organization’s punishment is adjusted according to
several factors, one of which is whether the organization has in
place an effective program to prevent and detect violations of
law.” In light of recent scandals, the U.S. Sentencing Commission
has “sent to Congress significant changes to the federal sentencing
guidelines for organizations, which should lead to a new era of
corporate compliance.” This amendment would strengthen the criteria
that companies are required to use when developing their compliance
programs.
HR professionals should, of course, be aware of these guidelines
and how they’re evolving. But even more challenging is the need to
customize programs to the specific risks in a given corporate
culture. “Getting it to work is not simple,” said Ed Petry,
executive director of the Ethics Officer Association, in
Workforce Strategies.
4) HR must stay abreast of emerging ethics issues. This doesn’t
mean just following legislation, which tends to be reactive rather
than proactive. It means looking at the entire social and business
environment and spotting conflicts of interest and other ethics
problems before they develop into full-blown scandals. A
combination of tools can help with this. Obviously, employers need
to pay close attention to the questions and concerns that are
flagged via employee hotline services and other feedback systems.
To gauge what’s happening outside the company, HR can turn to
environmental scanning techniques that help them see how new
developments – ranging from emerging technologies to global culture
clashes – could result in ethical problems down the road.