Question

In: Math

On the set S of all real numbers, define a relation R = {(a, b):a ≤ b}. Show that R is transitive.

On the set S of all real numbers, define a relation R = {(a, b):a ≤ b}. Show that R is transitive.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Given,

R = {(a, b):a ≤ b}

Reflexive Property

The Reflexive Property states that for every real number x, x = x.

Symmetric Property

The Symmetric Property states that for all real numbers x  and  y,

if  x = y, then y = x.

Transitive Property

The Transitive Property states that for all real numbers x ,y,  and  z,

if  x = y and y = z , then x = z

when, a = 1,b = 1,2

So, (1, 2),(2, 3) is possible, and (1, 3) is also possible as 1 ≤ 3.

Therefore, R is transitive.


Therefore, R is transitive.

Related Solutions

Suppose we define a relation ~ on the set of nonzero real numbers R* = R\{0}...
Suppose we define a relation ~ on the set of nonzero real numbers R* = R\{0} by for all a , b E R*, a ~ b if and only if ab>0. Prove that ~ is an equivalence relation. Find the equivalence class [8]. How many distinct equivalence classes are there?
Let R be a relation on a set that is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive?...
Let R be a relation on a set that is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive? Let R(x) = {y : x R y}. [Note that R(x) is the same as x / R except that R is not an equivalence relation in this case.] Does the set A = {R(x) : x ∈ A} always/sometimes/never form a partition of A? Prove that your answer is correct. Do not prove by examples.
2. Define a relation R on pairs of real numbers as follows: (a, b)R(c, d) iff...
2. Define a relation R on pairs of real numbers as follows: (a, b)R(c, d) iff either a < c or both a = c and b ≤ d. Is R a partial order? Why or why not? If R is a partial order, draw a diagram of some of its elements. 3. Define a relation R on integers as follows: mRn iff m + n is even. Is R a partial order? Why or why not? If R is...
5. (a) Prove that the set of all real numbers R is uncountable. (b) What is...
5. (a) Prove that the set of all real numbers R is uncountable. (b) What is the length of the Cantor set? Verify your answer.
Suppose we define the relation R on the set of all people by the rule "a...
Suppose we define the relation R on the set of all people by the rule "a R b if and only if a is Facebook friends with b." Is this relation reflexive? Is is symmetric? Is it transitive? Is it an equivalence relation? Briefly but clearly justify your answers.
1)Let S be the set of all students at a college. Define a relation on the...
1)Let S be the set of all students at a college. Define a relation on the set S by the rule that two people are related if they live less than 2 miles apart. Is this relation an equivalence relation on S? Justify your answer. 2) Define another relation on the set S from problem 5 by defining two people as related if they have the same classification (freshman, sophomore, junior, senior or graduate student). Is this an equivalence relation...
1)Let S be the set of all students at a college. Define a relation on the...
1)Let S be the set of all students at a college. Define a relation on the set S by the rule that two people are related if they live less than 2 miles apart. Is this relation an equivalence relation on S? Justify your answer. 2) Define another relation on the set S from problem 5 by defining two people as related if they have the same classification (freshman, sophomore, junior, senior or graduate student). Is this an equivalence relation...
1. Consider the function f: R→R, where R represents the set of all real numbers and...
1. Consider the function f: R→R, where R represents the set of all real numbers and for every x ϵ R, f(x) = x3. Which of the following statements is true? a. f is onto but not one-to-one. b. f is one-to-one but not onto. c. f is neither one-to-one nor onto. d. f is one-to-one and onto. 2. Consider the function g: Z→ {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5}, where Z represents the set of all integers and for...
Suppose we define a relation on the set of natural numbers as follows. Two numbers are...
Suppose we define a relation on the set of natural numbers as follows. Two numbers are related iff they leave the same remainder when divided by 5. Is it an equivalence relation? If yes, prove it and write the equivalence classes. If no, give formal justification.
Define a relation S from R to R by saying that  if and only if (a) List...
Define a relation S from R to R by saying that  if and only if (a) List five different elements of S. (b) Prove that S is not a function.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT