Question

In: Advanced Math

2. Define a relation R on pairs of real numbers as follows: (a, b)R(c, d) iff...

2. Define a relation R on pairs of real numbers as follows: (a, b)R(c, d) iff either a < c or both a = c and b ≤ d. Is R a partial order? Why or why not? If R is a partial order, draw a diagram of some of its elements.

3. Define a relation R on integers as follows: mRn iff m + n is even. Is R a partial order? Why or why not? If R is a partial order, draw a diagram of some of its elements.

4. Define a relation R as follows:

R = {(a, a),(b, b),(c, c),(d, d),(c, a),(a, d),(c, d),(b, c),(b, d),(b, a)}

Is R a partial order? Why or why not? If R is a partial order, draw a diagram of some of its elements.

5. How many different partial ordering relations are there on the set {a, b, c}?

6. Which of the following relations are partial orderings? Which are total orderings? Which are well-orderings?

            a. The relation described in Problem 2

            b. The relation described in Problem 3

            c. The relation described in Problem 4

            d. The "less-than" relation on the integers

            e. The "less-than-or-equal" relation on the integers

            f. The "less-than-or-equal" relation on the natural numbers

            g. The "less-than-or-equal" relation on the real numbers

            h. The "less-than-or-equal" relation on the non-negative real numbers

            i. The relations in Problem 5

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

Let R be the relation on Q defined by a/b R c/d iff ad=bc. Show that...
Let R be the relation on Q defined by a/b R c/d iff ad=bc. Show that R is an equivalence relation. Describe the elements of the equivalence class of 2/3.
On the set S of all real numbers, define a relation R = {(a, b):a ≤ b}. Show that R is transitive.
On the set S of all real numbers, define a relation R = {(a, b):a ≤ b}. Show that R is transitive.
Question 1. Equivalence Relation 1 Define a relation R on by iff . Prove that R...
Question 1. Equivalence Relation 1 Define a relation R on by iff . Prove that R is an equivalence relation, that is, prove that it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Determine the equivalence classes of this relation. What members are in the class [2]? How many members do the equivalence classes have? Do they all have the same number of members? How many equivalence classes are there? Question 2. Equivalence Relation 2 Consider the relation from last week defined as:...
Suppose we define a relation ~ on the set of nonzero real numbers R* = R\{0}...
Suppose we define a relation ~ on the set of nonzero real numbers R* = R\{0} by for all a , b E R*, a ~ b if and only if ab>0. Prove that ~ is an equivalence relation. Find the equivalence class [8]. How many distinct equivalence classes are there?
Let R be the relation on Z+× Z+ such that (a, b) R (c, d) if...
Let R be the relation on Z+× Z+ such that (a, b) R (c, d) if and only if ad=bc. (a) Show that R is an equivalence relation. (b) What is the equivalence class of (1,2)? List out at least five elements of the equivalence class. (c) Give an interpretation of the equivalence classes for R. [Here, an interpretation is a description of the equivalence classes that is more meaningful than a mere repetition of the definition of R. Hint:...
Is the relation R consisting of all ordered pairs (a, b) such that a and b...
Is the relation R consisting of all ordered pairs (a, b) such that a and b are people and have one common parent: reflexive, irreflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, asymmetric, and/or transitive? If a property doesn’t hold give a counter-example and state the logical definitions of the properties as you consider them.
For the relation R(A,B,C,D,E) with the following Functional Dependencies: A → B, A → C, BC...
For the relation R(A,B,C,D,E) with the following Functional Dependencies: A → B, A → C, BC → D, AC → E, CE → A, list all non-trivial FDs following from the above.    Generate all possible keys for R. Check whether R is in 3NF. If it is in 3NF, explain the criteria you used. If it is not in 3NF, convert it into 3NF, showing the new relations and their FDs.
Show that the set of all real numbers of the form a+b sqrt(2)+c sqrt(3)+d sqrt(6),where a,b,c,d...
Show that the set of all real numbers of the form a+b sqrt(2)+c sqrt(3)+d sqrt(6),where a,b,c,d ∈Q, forms a subfield of R
Define a relation ~ on Z x Z such that (a,b) ~ (c,d) precisely when a...
Define a relation ~ on Z x Z such that (a,b) ~ (c,d) precisely when a + b = c + d. Let R = {[(a,b)] : (a,b) in Z x Z} (i.e. R is the set of all equivalence classes of Z x Z under the equivalence relation ~). For each of the following operations, determine whether or not the operation is well defined. Prove your answer. [(x,y)] * [(w, z)] = [(x + w, y + z)] [(x,y)]...
Suppose we define a relation on the set of natural numbers as follows. Two numbers are...
Suppose we define a relation on the set of natural numbers as follows. Two numbers are related iff they leave the same remainder when divided by 5. Is it an equivalence relation? If yes, prove it and write the equivalence classes. If no, give formal justification.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT