Question

In: Advanced Math

Let R be a relation on a set that is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive?...

Let R be a relation on a set that is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive? Let R(x) = {y : x R y}. [Note that R(x) is the same as x / R except that R is not an equivalence relation in this case.] Does the set A = {R(x) : x ∈ A} always/sometimes/never form a partition of A? Prove that your answer is correct. Do not prove by examples.

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

A JAVA program that will read a boolean matrix corresponding to a relation R and output whether R is Reflexive, Symmetric, Anti-Symmetric and/or Transitive.
A JAVA program that will read a boolean matrix corresponding to a relation R and output whether R is Reflexive, Symmetric, Anti-Symmetric and/or Transitive. Input to the program will be the size n of an n x n boolean matrix followed by the matrix elements. Document your program nicely.NOTE: The program must output a reason in the case that an input relation fails to have a certain property.
Determine whether the relation R on the set of all people is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and/or...
Determine whether the relation R on the set of all people is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and/or transitive, where (a, b) ∈ R if and only if a) a is taller than b. b) a and b were born on the same day.
Determine whether the relation R on the set of all real numbers is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric,...
Determine whether the relation R on the set of all real numbers is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and/or transitive, where (x,y) ∈ R if and only if: a) x = 1 OR y = 1 b) x = 1 I was curious about how those two compare. I have the solutions for part a) already.
For each of the properties reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and transitive, carry out the following. Assume that...
For each of the properties reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and transitive, carry out the following. Assume that R and S are nonempty relations on a set A that both have the property. For each of R complement (Rc), R∪S, R∩Sand R−1. determine whether the new relation must also have that property; might have that property, but might not; or cannot have that property. Any time you answer Statement i or Statement iii, outline a proof. Any time you answer Statement ii,...
For each of the properties reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and transitive, carry out the following. Assume that...
For each of the properties reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric, and transitive, carry out the following. Assume that R and S are nonempty relations on a set A that both have the property. For each of R complement, R∪S, R∩S, and R−1, determine whether the new relation must also have that property; might have that property, but might not; or cannot have that property. A ny time you answer Statement i or Statement iii, outline a proof. Any time you answer Statement...
Determine whether the relations described by the conditions below are reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric or transitive on...
Determine whether the relations described by the conditions below are reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric or transitive on a set A = {1, 2, 3, 4} All ordered pairs of (x, y) such that x   not Equal   y. All ordered pairs of (x, y) such that y > 2. All ordered pairs of (x, y) such that x = y ± 1. All ordered pairs of (x, y) such that x = y2. All ordered pairs of (x, y) such that x...
Determine if the following is is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric and transitive and why? x relates y...
Determine if the following is is reflexive, symmetric, antisymmetric and transitive and why? x relates y <-> x divides y 2 (on all positive numbers)
On the set S of all real numbers, define a relation R = {(a, b):a ≤ b}. Show that R is transitive.
On the set S of all real numbers, define a relation R = {(a, b):a ≤ b}. Show that R is transitive.
Let x be a set and let R be a relation on x such x is...
Let x be a set and let R be a relation on x such x is simultaneously reflexive, symmetric, and antisymmetric. Prove equivalence relation.
Let R be the relation on the set of people given by aRb if a and...
Let R be the relation on the set of people given by aRb if a and b have at least one parent in common. Is R an equivalence relation? (Equivalence Relations and Partitions)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT