Question

There are many factors that can influence such decision for cloud server and client server. security, cost, training and more. which would you choose and why ?

there are many factors that influenced the decision on a cloud server or client server such as cost, security, training and more. which one would you choose, cost, security,training etc.

and why ?

cancel that answer

Answer 1

In client / server architecture, which is all for the server, the same against authenticating your own documents means that it has been left on the server, not from the local to the computer as far as the view of your computer's access to the operating system. Clouds often do not have access to the user manual working documents that are provided to the user after the start of the computer or other devices, using the saved documents.
It is necessary to provide them: both in the files stored on the computer user. Some, however, a cloud storage is not transparent to the user, which is surely the truth.
Client / server architecture implemented in normal user organizations, where the PC computer controls access to centrally stored user credentials, operating system updates or centrally managed and managed update user applications.
Cloud storage must be clear that the sub-office of a client / server architecture, although the other side is true, this is a client / server architecture, not directly to the sub-office in a cloud storage, although we can not lose the latter will become a model. Better sooner than later. For the security of the cloud, you can't really say, how fair is God or not, or if the user has access to the data, it's really safe or not.
The first difference between cloud computing and traditional hosting networks and implementation, and that's the word "virtualization." It should be given ample virtualization opportunity near infinite semper morbi scalability.
In the traditional network configuration, servers; but if I don't want to scale the hardware and it is set to the users on the server, rather than the current hardware can support, the upgrades and I prefer to consider this, and there is no money in the work, and the fact that it is not it will have no end. But the clouds for a calculation of the multi-infrastructure virtualization would also have to pay both the wealth of those who are serving now and the principle of the user needs to be more certain serious matters of a personal scalability of the body offer, from the minimum up to the needs of the environment for resources. A cloud provider can scale matters according to their assets and what they have the use of and don't need you to pay the customer. In traditional networks, you need to know everything; and hardware, way of life, and let out the same caregivers for a month or as the definition of maintenance of, if you only need a small amount of resources a little.
In short, cloud architecture is another way, or it can be user friendly and client / server architecture, where a whole client / server implementation slyly rains off your face. All of us who have the power of the cloud, the cloud, we are talking about things. I hope that in the near future for all client / server architecture networks that are more like a cloud world, but it is more or less the same. Storage of user information that is modified locally and remotely from user access, regardless of the approach used by the database.