In: Accounting
3. A two-workstation cell uses a kanban system to produce 200,000 parts per year. Expected leadtime to replenish a container is 0.75 hours (i.e. 45 minutes). Parts cost $100 and have an inventory opportunity cost of 15%. There are three material handling options available:
Manual - annual fixed cost of $25,000, cost per trip = $0.10, Max load size = 5;
Push Cart - annual fixed cost of $25,000 + $5,000 initial investment (must be amortized over 5 years), cost per trip = $0.15, Max load size = 50; and
Forklift - annual fixed cost of $25,000 + $60,000 initial investment (must be amortized over 8 years), cost per trip = $0.50, Max load size = 1000.
Note: The company uses a MARR of 20% for all investments.
a) (25%) Specify the following system design parameters: container size, material handling type, # kanban that will be feasible and minimize material handling cost.
b) (5%) How would the system be different if it was controlled by CONWIP versus Kanban? Provide a conceptual example.
Particulars | Manual | Push Cart | Forklift |
Annual Fixed Cost (A) | 25,000 | 25,000 | 25,000 |
Initial Investment | - | 5,000 | 60,000 |
No. Of Years (Life) | 5 | 8 | |
Annual Depreciation (B) | - | 1,000 | 7,500 |
Total Production | 2,00,000 | 2,00,000 | 2,00,000 |
Load Size | 5 | 50 | 1,000 |
No. oF trips | 40,000 | 4,000 | 200 |
Cost Per Trip | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.50 |
Total Cost of Trips © | 4,000 | 600 | 100 |
Total Cost | 29,000 | 26,600 | 32,600 |
Cost of Push Card Option is least. Hence, it is feasible with the minimal cost.