Question

In: Accounting

Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals....

  1. Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows:

    Project
    Name
    Sierra Tango Uniform Victor
    Investment $862,500 Investment $2,025,000 Investment $1,433,320 Investment $1,040,013


    Year

    Income from
    Operations

    Net Cash Flows

    Income from
    Operations

    Net Cash Flows

    Income from
    Operations

    Net Cash Flows

    Income from
    Operations

    Net Cash Flows
    1 $80,500 $230,000 $279,000 $900,000 $180,000 $400,000 $109,000 $390,000
    2 81,000 230,000 279,275 900,000 180,000 400,000 109,000 390,000
    3 81,500 230,000 279,550 900,000 180,000 400,000 109,000 390,000
    4 82,000 230,000 279,825 900,000 180,000 400,000 109,000 390,000
    5 82,500 230,000 280,100 900,000 180,000 400,000 109,000 390,000
    Total $407,500 $1,150,000 $1,397,750 $4,500,000 $900,000 $2,000,000 $545,000 $1,950,000
    1. Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest
      Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20%
      1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833
      2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694
      3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579
      4 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482
      5 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402
      6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335
      7 0.665 0.513 0.452 0.376 0.279
      8 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.327 0.233
      9 0.592 0.424 0.361 0.284 0.194
      10 0.558 0.386 0.322 0.247 0.162

    The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum The expected period of time that will elapse between the date of a capital expenditure and the complete recovery in cash (or equivalent) of the amount invested.cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum A method of evaluating capital investment proposals that focuses on the expected profitability of the investment.average rate of return of 20% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the A method of analyzing proposed capital investments that focuses on the present value of the cash flows expected from the investments.net present value method and An index computed by dividing the total present value of the net cash flow to be received from a proposed capital investment by the amount to be invested.present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals.

    Required:

    1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals. Assume that net cash flows are uniform throughout the year.

    Cash Payback Period
    Proposal Sierra 3 years 9 months
    • 2 years
    • 3 years
    • 3 years 9 months
    • 3 years 3 months
    • unable to determine
    Proposal Tango 2 years 3 months
    • 2 years
    • 3 years
    • 2 years 3 months
    • 2 years 9 months
    • unable to determine
    Proposal Uniform 3 years 7 months
    • 2 years
    • 3 years
    • 3 years 7 months
    • 3 years 5 months
    • unable to determine
    Proposal Victor 2 years 8 months
    • 2 years
    • 3 years
    • 2 years 8 months
    • 2 years 4 months
    • unable to determine

    2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. Round to one decimal place.

    Average Rate of Return
    Proposal Sierra %
    Proposal Tango %
    Proposal Uniform %
    Proposal Victor %

    3. Using the results from parts (1) and (2) determine which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected.

    Accept / Reject
    Proposal Sierra Reject
    • Accept for further analysis
    • Reject
    Proposal Tango Accept for further analysis
    • Accept for further analysis
    • Reject
    Proposal Uniform Reject
    • Accept for further analysis
    • Reject
    Proposal Victor Accept for further analysis
    • Accept for further analysis
    • Reject

    4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 12% and the present value of $1 table above. If required, use the minus sign to indicate a subtraction or negative net present value.

    Select the proposal accepted for further analysis. Proposal Tango
    • Proposal Sierra
    • Proposal Tango
    Proposal Victor
    • Proposal Uniform
    • Proposal Victor
    Present value of net cash flow total $ $
    Amount to be invested
    Net present value $ $

    5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places.

    Select the proposal to compute present value index. Proposal Tango
    • Proposal Sierra
    • Proposal Tango
    Proposal Victor
    • Proposal Uniform
    • Proposal Victor
    Present value index (rounded)

Solutions

Expert Solution

1. Payback period = Investment / Annual cash flow

Project Investment Annual cash flow Payback period
Sierra 862500 230000 3.75 3 years 9 months
Tango 2025000 900000 2.25 2 years 3 months
Uniform 1433320 400000 3.5833 3 years 7 months
Victor 1040013 390000 2.6667 2 years 8 months

2. Average Rate of Return = Average income / Average Investment * 100

Project Average investment Income Average income Average Rate of Return
Sierra 431250 407500 81500 18.90%
Tango 1012500 1397750 279550 27.61%
Uniform 716660 900000 180000 25.12%
Victor 520007 545000 109000 20.96%

3.

Project Payback period Average Rate of Return Decision
Sierra 3 years 9 months 18.90% Reject
Tango 2 years 3 months 27.61% Accept
Uniform 3 years 7 months 25.12% Accept
Victor 2 years 8 months 20.96% Reject

4.

Tango Uniform
PV of net cash flow* 3244500 1442000
Amount to be invested -2025000 -1433320
NPV 1219500 8680

* PV of net cash flow

Tango Unifom
Year Cash flow PVF @ 12% PV Cash flow PVF @ 12% PV
1 900000 0.893 803700 400000 0.893 357200
2 900000 0.797 717300 400000 0.797 318800
3 900000 0.712 640800 400000 0.712 284800
4 900000 0.636 572400 400000 0.636 254400
5 900000 0.567 510300 400000 0.567 226800
Total 3244500 1442000

5.

Tango Uniform
PV index 1.60* 1.01**

* 3244500 / 2025000

** 1442000 / 1433320


Related Solutions

Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flows Proposal Sierra: $850,000 1 $ 80,000 $ 250,000 2 80,000 250,000 3 80,000 250,000 4 30,000 200,000 5 (70,000) 100,000 $200,000 $ 1,050,000 Proposal Tango: $1,200,000 1 $320,000 $ 560,000 2...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flows Proposal Sierra: $850,000 1 $ 80,000 $ 250,000 2 80,000 250,000 3 80,000 250,000 4 30,000 200,000 5 (70,000) 100,000 $200,000 $ 1,050,000 Proposal Tango: $1,200,000 1 $320,000 $ 560,000 2...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated Operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $450,000 1 $30,000 $120,000 2    30,000   120,000 3    20,000   110,000 4    10,000   100,000 5   (30,000)    60,000 $60,000 $510,000 Proposal B: $200,000 1 $60,000 $100,000 2    40,000     80,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $64,000 $200,000 2    64,000   200,000 3    64,000   200,000 4    24,000   160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1    $26,000 $90,000 2...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT