Question

In: Accounting

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals

Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows:

Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow
Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000
2    64,000    200,000
3    64,000    200,000
4    24,000    160,000
5    24,000    160,000
$240,000 $ 920,000
Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000 $ 90,000
2    26,000     90,000
3      6,000     70,000
4      6,000     70,000
5 (44,000)     20,000
$ 20,000 $340,000
Proposal C: $108,000 1 $ 33,400 $ 55,000
2    31,400    53,000
3    28,400    50,000
4    25,400    47,000
5    23,400    45,000
$142,000 $ 250,000
Proposal D: $400,000 1 $100,000 $ 180,000
2   100,000    180,000
3    80,000    160,000
4    20,000    100,000
5 0        80,000
$300,000 $700,000

The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals.

Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest
Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20%
1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833
2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694
3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579
4 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482
5 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402
6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335
7 0.665 0.513 0.452 0.376 0.279
8 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.327 0.233
9 0.592 0.424 0.361 0.284 0.194
10 0.558 0.386 0.322 0.247 0.162

Required:

1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals.

Cash Payback Period
Proposal A 3 years 6 months
Proposal B 4 years
Proposal C 2 years
Proposal D 2 years 3 months

2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.

Average Rate of Return
Proposal A %
Proposal B %
Proposal C %
Proposal D %

3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2) by placing the calculated amounts in the first two columns on the left and indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.

Proposal Cash Payback Period Average Rate of Return Accept or Reject
A 3 years, 6 months % Reject
B 4 years % Reject
C 2 years % Accept
D 2 years, 3 months % Accept

4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 15% and the present value of $1 table above. Round to the nearest dollar.

Select the proposal accepted for further analysis. Proposal C Proposal D
Present value of net cash flow total $ $
Less amount to be invested
Net present value $ $

5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). If required, round your answers to two decimal places.

Select proposal to compute Present value index. Proposal C Proposal D
Present value index (rounded)

6. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present values of net cash flows computed in part (4).

Rank 1st Proposal D
Rank 2nd Proposal C

7. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present value indexes computed in part (5).

Rank 1st Proposal C
Rank 2nd Proposal D

8. The analysis indicates that although Proposal D  has the larger net present value, it is not as attractive as Proposal C  in terms of the amount of present value per dollar invested. Proposal D  requires the larger investment. Thus, management should use investment resources for Proposal C  before investing in Proposal D , absent any other qualitative considerations that may impact the decision.

Solutions

Expert Solution

SOLUTION

1. Payback Period
Proposal A: 3 -year, 6 -month cash payback period
Net Cash Cumulative
Year and Months Flow Net Cash Flows
Year 1 full year $     200,000 $    200,000
Year 2 full year         200,000       400,000
Year 3 full year         200,000       600,000
Year 4 6 months           80,000       680,000
Proposal B: 4 -year, 0 -month cash payback period
Net Cash Cumulative
Year and Months Flow Net Cash Flows
Year 1 full year $       90,000 $     90,000
Year 2 full year           90,000       180,000
Year 3 full year           70,000       250,000
Year 4 full year           70,000       320,000
Proposal C: 2 -year, 0 -month cash payback period
Net Cash Cumulative
Year and Months Flow Net Cash Flows
Year 1 full year $       55,000 $     55,000
Year 2 full year           53,000       108,000
Year 3 N/A                    -                  -
Year 4 N/A                    -                  -
Proposal D: 2 -year, 3 -month cash payback period
Net Cash Cumulative
Year and Months Flow Net Cash Flows
Year 1 full year $     180,000 $    180,000
Year 2 full year         180,000       360,000
Year 3 3 months           40,000       400,000
Year 4 N/A                    -                  -


Related Solutions

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $64,000 $200,000 2    64,000   200,000 3    64,000   200,000 4    24,000   160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1    $26,000 $90,000 2...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated Operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $450,000 1 $30,000 $120,000 2    30,000   120,000 3    20,000   110,000 4    10,000   100,000 5   (30,000)    60,000 $60,000 $510,000 Proposal B: $200,000 1 $60,000 $100,000 2    40,000     80,000...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT