Question

In: Accounting

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals

Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows:

Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow
Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000
2    64,000    200,000
3    64,000    200,000
4    24,000    160,000
5    24,000    160,000
$240,000 $ 920,000
Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000 $ 90,000
2    26,000     90,000
3      6,000     70,000
4      6,000     70,000
5 (44,000)     20,000
$ 20,000 $340,000
Proposal C: $108,000 1 $ 33,400 $ 55,000
2    31,400    53,000
3    28,400    50,000
4    25,400    47,000
5    23,400    45,000
$142,000 $ 250,000
Proposal D: $400,000 1 $100,000 $ 180,000
2   100,000    180,000
3    80,000    160,000
4    20,000    100,000
5 0        80,000
$300,000 $700,000

The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals.

Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest
Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20%
1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833
2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694
3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579
4 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482
5 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402
6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335
7 0.665 0.513 0.452 0.376 0.279
8 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.327 0.233
9 0.592 0.424 0.361 0.284 0.194
10 0.558 0.386 0.322 0.247 0.162

Required:

1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals.

Cash Payback Period
Proposal A
Proposal B
Proposal C
Proposal D

2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.

Average Rate of Return
Proposal A %
Proposal B %
Proposal C %
Proposal D %

3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2) by placing the calculated amounts in the first two columns on the left and indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.

Proposal Cash Payback Period Average Rate of Return Accept or Reject
A %
B %
C %
D %

4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 15% and the present value of $1 table above. Round to the nearest dollar.

Select the proposal accepted for further analysis.
Present value of net cash flow total $ $
Less amount to be invested
Net present value $ $

5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). If required, round your answers to two decimal places.

Select proposal to compute Present value index.
Present value index (rounded)

6. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present values of net cash flows computed in part (4).

Rank 1st
Rank 2nd

7. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present value indexes computed in part (5).

Rank 1st
Rank 2nd

8. The analysis indicates that although Proposal   has the larger net present value, it is not as attractive as Proposal   in terms of the amount of present value per dollar invested. Proposal   requires the larger investment. Thus, management should use investment resources for Proposal   before investing in Proposal  , absent any other qualitative considerations that may impact the decision.

Solutions

Expert Solution

1 Payback period=Year after which cumulative cashflow become positive+(cumulative cashflow of the year after which cumulative cashflow become positive/cashflow for next year)
Proposal A:
Year Net cash flow Cumulative cash flow
0 -680000 -680000
1 200000 -480000
2 200000 -280000
3 200000 -80000
4 160000 80000
5 160000 240000
Payback period=3+(80000/160000)=3+0.5=3.5 years=3 years and 6 months
Proposal B:
Year Net cash flow Cumulative cash flow
0 -320000 -320000
1 90000 -230000
2 90000 -140000
3 70000 -70000
4 70000 0
5 20000 20000
Payback period=4+(0/160000)=4+0=4 years
Proposal C:
Year Net cash flow Cumulative cash flow
0 -108000 -108000
1 55000 -53000
2 53000 0
3 50000 50000
4 47000 97000
5 45000 142000
Payback period=2+(0/160000)=2+0=2 years
Proposal D:
Year Net cash flow Cumulative cash flow
0 -400000 -400000
1 180000 -220000
2 180000 -40000
3 160000 120000
4 100000 220000
5 80000 300000
Payback period=2+(40000/160000)=2+0.25=2.25 years=2 years and 3 months
2 Average rate of return=Average operating income/Average Investment
Average operating income=Total Operating income/number of years
Average Investment=(Beginning value of investment+Ending value of investment)/2
Proposal A Proposal B Proposal C Proposal D
Total Operating income a 240000 20000 142000 300000
Number of years b 5 5 5 5
Average operating income c=a/b 48000 4000 28400 60000
Beginning value of investment d 680000 320000 108000 400000
Ending value of investment e 0 0 0 0
Average Investment f=(d+e)/2 340000 160000 54000 200000
Average rate of return g=c/f 14.1% 2.5% 52.6% 30.0%


Related Solutions

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $64,000 $200,000 2    64,000   200,000 3    64,000   200,000 4    24,000   160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1    $26,000 $90,000 2...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated Operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $450,000 1 $30,000 $120,000 2    30,000   120,000 3    20,000   110,000 4    10,000   100,000 5   (30,000)    60,000 $60,000 $510,000 Proposal B: $200,000 1 $60,000 $100,000 2    40,000     80,000...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flows Proposal Sierra: $850,000 1 $ 80,000 $ 250,000 2 80,000 250,000 3 80,000 250,000 4 30,000 200,000 5 (70,000) 100,000 $200,000 $ 1,050,000 Proposal Tango: $1,200,000 1 $320,000 $ 560,000 2...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flows Proposal Sierra: $850,000 1 $ 80,000 $ 250,000 2 80,000 250,000 3 80,000 250,000 4 30,000 200,000 5 (70,000) 100,000 $200,000 $ 1,050,000 Proposal Tango: $1,200,000 1 $320,000 $ 560,000 2...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT