Question

In: Accounting

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals

Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows:

Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow
Proposal A: $680,000 1 $64,000 $200,000
2    64,000   200,000
3    64,000   200,000
4    24,000   160,000
5    24,000    160,000
$240,000 $920,000
Proposal B: $320,000 1    $26,000 $90,000
2      26,000     90,000
3        6,000     70,000
4        6,000     70,000
5      (44,000)     20,000
    $20,000 $340,000
Proposal C: $108,000 1     $33,400 $55,000
2      31,400    53,000
3      28,400    50,000
4      25,400    47,000
5     23,400    45,000
$142,000 $250,000
Proposal D: $400,000 1 $100,000 $180,000
2   100,000   180,000
3     80,000   160,000
4    20,000   100,000
5 0       80,000
$300,000 $700,000

The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals.

Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest
Year 6% 10% 12% 15% 20%
1 0.943 0.909 0.893 0.870 0.833
2 0.890 0.826 0.797 0.756 0.694
3 0.840 0.751 0.712 0.658 0.579
4 0.792 0.683 0.636 0.572 0.482
5 0.747 0.621 0.567 0.497 0.402
6 0.705 0.564 0.507 0.432 0.335
7 0.665 0.513 0.452 0.376 0.279
8 0.627 0.467 0.404 0.327 0.233
9 0.592 0.424 0.361 0.284 0.194
10 0.558 0.386 0.322 0.247 0.162

Required:

1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals.

Cash Payback Period
Proposal A:
Proposal B:
Proposal C:
Proposal D:

2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.

Average Rate of Return
Proposal A: %
Proposal B: %
Proposal C: %
Proposal D: %

3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2) by placing the calculated amounts in the first two columns on the left and indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.

Proposal Cash Payback Period Average Rate of Return Accept or Reject
A %
B %
C %
D %

4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 15% and the present value of $1 table above. Round to the nearest dollar.

Note: Select the proposals in alphabetic order.

Select the proposal accepted for further analysis.
Present value of net cash flow total $ $
Less amount to be invested $ $
Net present value $ $

Solutions

Expert Solution

Ans 1
Cash payback period
Year Income from operations I Depreciation D Net cash flow I +D Cumulative cash flow
0 ($680,000) ($680,000)
1 $64,000 136000 $200,000 ($480,000)
2 $64,000 136000 $200,000 ($280,000)
3 $64,000 136000 $200,000 ($80,000)
4 $24,000 136000 $160,000 $80,000
5 $24,000 136000 $160,000 $240,000
Annual cash inflow
Income from operations+Depreciation
Depreciation
680000/5 136000
Payback period= last period with negative cumulative cash flow+absolute value d cumulative cash at the period end/total cash flow in the period after last period negative cash flow
Payback 3+(80000/160000) 3.5
Proposal B
Cash payback perod
Year Income from operations I Depreciation D Net cash flow I +D Cumulative cash flow
0 ($320,000) ($320,000)
1 $26,000 64000 $90,000 ($230,000)
2 $26,000 64000 $90,000 ($140,000)
3 $6,000 64000 $70,000 ($70,000)
4 $6,000 64000 $70,000 $0
5 ($44,000) 64000 $20,000 $20,000
Annual cash inflow
Income from operations+Depreciation
Depreciation
320000/5 64000
Payback 4 Years
Proposal C
Cash payback perod
Year Income from operations I Depreciation D Net cash flow I +D Cumulative cash flow
0 ($108,000) ($108,000)
1 $33,400 21600 $55,000 ($53,000)
2 $55,000 21600 $76,600 $23,600
3 $53,000 21600 $74,600 $98,200
4 $47,000 21600 $68,600 $166,800
5 $45,000 21600 $66,600 $233,400
Annual cash inflow
Income from operations+Depreciation
Depreciation
108000/5 21600
Payback 1.69 Years
1+(53000/76600)
Proposal D
Cash payback perod
Year Income from operations I Depreciation D Net cash flow I +D Cumulative cash flow
0 ($400,000) ($400,000)
1 $100,000 80000 $180,000 ($220,000)
2 $100,000 80000 $180,000 ($40,000)
3 $80,000 80000 $160,000 $120,000
4 $20,000 80000 $100,000 $220,000
5 $0 80000 $80,000 $300,000
Annual cash inflow
Income from operations+Depreciation
Depreciation
400000/5 80000
Payback 2.25 Years
2+(40000/160000)
answer Cash Payback Period if one decimal
Proposal A: 3.5
Proposal B: 4
Proposal C: 1.69 1.7
Proposal D: 2.25 2.3
ans 2
Average rate of return=average profit/average investment*100
Proposal A Proposal B Proposal C Proposal D
Total income from operations $240,000 $20,000 142000 $300,000
No. of years 5 5 5 5
Average profit A $48,000 $4,000 $28,400 $60,000
Av erage investment B 340000 160000 90000 200000
(initial investment+salvage value)/2 (680000+0)/2 (320000+0)/2 (180000+0)/2 (400000+0)/2
answer
ARR A/B 14.1 2.5 31.6 30
Average Rate of Return
Proposal A: 14.1
Proposal B: 2.5
Proposal C: 31.6
Proposal D: 30
ans 3
Proposal Cash Payback Period Average Rate of Return Accept or Reject
A 3.5 14.1 % Reject (as paybck is more)
B 4.0 2.5 % Reject (as paybck is more and return less)
C 1.7 31.6 % Accept
D 2.3 30.0 Accept
ans 4 Present value of net cash flow total
Proposal C
Year Net Cash Discount factor Discounted cash flow
Flow 15%
1 $33,400 0.87 $29,058
2 31,400 0.756 $23,738
3 28,400 0.658 $18,687
4 25,400 0.572 $14,529
5 23,400 0.497 $11,630
Total $142,000 $97,642
Present value of net cash flow total
Proposal D
Year Net Cash Discount factor Discounted cash flow
Flow 15%
1 $180,000 0.87 $156,600
2 $180,000 0.756 $136,080
3 $160,000 0.658 $105,280
4 $100,000 0.572 $57,200
5 $80,000 0.497 $39,760
Total $700,000 $494,920
Select the proposal accepted for further analysis. Proposal C Proposal D
Present value of net cash flow total $97,642 $494,920
Less amount to be invested -108000 -400000
Net present value ($10,358) $94,920
Accepted
If any doubt please comment.

Related Solutions

Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated Operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $450,000 1 $30,000 $120,000 2    30,000   120,000 3    20,000   110,000 4    10,000   100,000 5   (30,000)    60,000 $60,000 $510,000 Proposal B: $200,000 1 $60,000 $100,000 2    40,000     80,000...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flows Proposal Sierra: $850,000 1 $ 80,000 $ 250,000 2 80,000 250,000 3 80,000 250,000 4 30,000 200,000 5 (70,000) 100,000 $200,000 $ 1,050,000 Proposal Tango: $1,200,000 1 $320,000 $ 560,000 2...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of...
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flows Proposal Sierra: $850,000 1 $ 80,000 $ 250,000 2 80,000 250,000 3 80,000 250,000 4 30,000 200,000 5 (70,000) 100,000 $200,000 $ 1,050,000 Proposal Tango: $1,200,000 1 $320,000 $ 560,000 2...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT