Question

Discuss why the proper communication form and method is necessary to coordinate and control organizational activities.

Answer 1

New, more natural structures or associations enable associations to be more responsive and versatile in the present quickly evolving world. These structures likewise develop strengthening among workers, considerably more than the progressive, inflexibly organized associations of the past.

Numerous individuals attest that as the idea of associations has changed, so should the idea of administration control. A few guarantee that administration shouldn't practice any type of control at all. They assert that administration should exist to help representative's endeavors to be completely beneficial individuals from associations and networks along these lines, any type of control is totally counterproductive to administration and workers.

A few people even respond emphatically against the expression administration control. The word itself can have a negative undertone, e.g., it can sound ruling, coercive and blundering. It appears that scholars of administration writing presently lean toward utilization of the expression "organizing" as opposed to controlling.

Despite the negative undertone of "control", it must exist or there is no association. In its most fundamental shape, an association is at least two individuals cooperating to achieve an objective. Regardless of whether an association is exceptionally bureaucratic or changing and self-arranging, the association must exist for reasons unknown, some reason, and some mission or is anything but an association by any means. The association must have some objective. Distinguishing this objective requires some type of arranging, casual or formal. Achieving the objective means distinguishing a few procedures, formal or casual. These systems are settled upon by individuals from the association through some type of correspondence, formal or casual. At that point individuals set going to act as per what they consented to do. They may alter their opinions, fine. Be that as it may, they have to perceive and recognize that they're altering their opinions.

This type of progressing correspondence to achieve an objective, following exercises toward the objective and after that consequent choices about what to do is the embodiment of administration coordination. It needs to exist in some way formal or casual. The accompanying are somewhat average strategies for coordination in associations. They are utilized as intends to convey heading and guide practices toward that path. The capacity of the accompanying techniques isn't to "control", yet rather to direct. From progressing correspondences among administration and workers, the bearing changes, at that point fine. The accompanying techniques are changed as needs be.

Note that the accompanying techniques point that we frequently don't consider them having anything to do with coordination by any means. Regardless of what one calls the accompanying techniques coordination or control they're critical to the achievement of any association.