Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....

A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 17 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 41.1 with a standard deviation of 7.5 A random sample of 15 nursing students from Group 2 resulted in a mean score of 49.3 with a standard deviation of 8.9 Can you conclude that the mean score for Group 1 is significantly lower than the mean score for Group 2? Let μ1 represent the mean score for Group 1 and μ2 represent the mean score for Group 2. Use a significance level of α=0.01 for the test. Assume that the population variances are equal and that the two populations are normally distributed.

Step 1 of 4: State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

Step 2 of 4: Compute the value of the t test statistic. Round your answer to three decimal places.

Step 3 of 4: Determine the decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis H0H0. Round your answer to three decimal places.

Step 4 of 4: State the test's conclusion. (Reject or fail to reject null hypothesis)

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution:

State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

Null hypothesis: H0: the mean score for Group 1 is same as the mean score for Group 2.

Alternative hypothesis: Ha: the mean score for Group 1 is significantly lower than the mean score for Group 2.

H0: µ1 = µ2 versus Ha: µ1 < µ2

Compute the value of the t test statistic.

Test statistic formula for pooled variance t test is given as below:

t = (X1bar – X2bar) / sqrt[Sp2*((1/n1)+(1/n2))]

Where Sp2 is pooled variance

Sp2 = [(n1 – 1)*S1^2 + (n2 – 1)*S2^2]/(n1 + n2 – 2)

We are given

X1bar = 41.1

X2bar = 49.3

S1 = 7.5

S2 = 8.9

n1 = 17

n2 = 15

(X1bar – X2bar) = 41.1 – 49.3 = -8.2

df = n1 + n2 – 2 = 17 + 15 – 2 = 30

Sp2 = [(n1 – 1)*S1^2 + (n2 – 1)*S2^2]/(n1 + n2 – 2)

Sp2 = [(17 – 1)*7.5^2 + (15 – 1)*8.9^2]/(17 + 15 – 2)

Sp2 = 66.9647

t = (X1bar – X2bar) / sqrt[Sp2*((1/n1)+(1/n2))]

t = -8.2/ sqrt[66.9647*((1/17)+(1/15))]

t = -8.2 / 2.8989

t = -2.8287

Test statistic = t = -2.829

Determine the decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis H0.

We have

df = 30

α = 0.01

Test is one tailed (lower tailed)

So, required critical t value by using t-table is given as below:

Critical value = -2.4573

Decision rule: Reject H0 if test statistic t < -2.4573

State the test's conclusion.

Here, test statistic = t = -2.829 < critical value = -2.4573

So, we reject the null hypothesis H0

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean score for Group 1 is significantly lower than the mean score for Group 2.


Related Solutions

A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 11 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 56.1 with a standard deviation of 5.5 A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 12 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 47.5 with a standard deviation of 7.8. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 12 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 54.7 with a standard deviation of 6. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 10 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 45.3 with a standard deviation of 4.5. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 10 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 65.8 with a standard deviation of 5.1. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 12 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 47.5 with a standard deviation of 7.8 ....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 9 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 46.1 with a standard deviation of 5.9. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 19 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 62.1 with a standard deviation of 4.4. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 11 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 53.1 with a standard deviation of 4.4. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 1111 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 56.356.3 with a standard deviation of 6.16.1. A...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT