Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....

A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 10 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 65.8 with a standard deviation of 5.1. A random sample of 16 nursing students from Group 2 resulted in a mean score of 70.4 with a standard deviation of 7.6. Can you conclude that the mean score for Group 1 is significantly lower than the mean score for Group 2? Let μ1 represent the mean score for Group 1 and μ2 represent the mean score for Group 2. Use a significance level of α=0.05 for the test. Assume that the population variances are equal and that the two populations are normally distributed.

Step 1 of 4: State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

Step 2 of 4: Compute the value of the t test statistic. Round your answer to three decimal places.

Step 3 of 4: Determine the decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis H0. Round your answer to three decimal places.

Step 4 of 4: State the test's conclusion.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The samples given are independent since they are from two different nursing students. We want to test the difference of the population means. The population SD are unknown and are assumed to be equal. Also the data is normally distributed so we will conduct an independent samples' t-test for equal variances.

We want to test if mean of group (1) is lower than mean of group 2: (1) < (2) : (1) - (2) < 0. So this is a left tailed one sided test.

Step 1 of 4: State the null and alternative hypotheses for the test.

H0: μ1 - μ2 = 0

H1: μ1 - μ2 < 0

Group 1 Group 2
n 10 16
Mean 65.8 70.4
SD 5.1 7.6
Var(SD2) 26.01 57.76

Step 2 of 4: Compute the value of the t test statistic. Round your answer to three decimal places.

Pooled variance =

= 45.8538

Test Stat =

Where the null difference = 0

Test stat =-1.6852

Step 3 of 4: Determine the decision rule for rejecting the null hypothesis H0. Round your answer to three decimal places.

p-value approach

We reject the null hypothesis if p-value < level of significance

Critical value approach

We reject the null hypothesis if |Test Stat| > C.V. at level of significance

Step 4 of 4: State the test's conclusion.

Level of significance

p-value = P ( > |T.S. |)

= P(t24 > 1.69) ........using t-dist tables

p-value = 0.052

Since p-value >0.05

We do not reejct the null hypothesis.

C.V. =

=t24, 0.05

C.V. =1.7109

Since |test Stat| < C.V.

We do not reject the null hypothesis.

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that mean of group (1) is significantly lower than mean of group 2.


Related Solutions

A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 11 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 56.1 with a standard deviation of 5.5 A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 12 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 47.5 with a standard deviation of 7.8. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 12 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 54.7 with a standard deviation of 6. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 10 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 45.3 with a standard deviation of 4.5. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 12 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 47.5 with a standard deviation of 7.8 ....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 9 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 46.1 with a standard deviation of 5.9. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 19 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 62.1 with a standard deviation of 4.4. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 11 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 53.1 with a standard deviation of 4.4. A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 17 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 41.1 with a standard deviation of 7.5 A...
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers....
A study was designed to compare the attitudes of two groups of nursing students towards computers. Group 1 had previously taken a statistical methods course that involved significant computer interaction. Group 2 had taken a statistic methods course that did not use computers. The students' attitudes were measured by administering the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). A random sample of 1111 nursing students from Group 1 resulted in a mean score of 56.356.3 with a standard deviation of 6.16.1. A...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT