strategies of qualitative research
validity/trustworthiness/rigor:
- credibility: it is otherwise called internal validity. it
mainly depends upon the richness of data than the quantity of
data.
- transferability: it is otherwise called external validity. this
means the results are generalised and can be applied toother
setting similar to this.
- dependability: it is otherwise known as reliability.this is
important for other researchers who want to replicate the
study.
- confirmability: it is usually used to evaluate the
results.
- it usually emphasizes word ratherthan quantity oc collection
and analysis of data.
- it has rejected the practices and norms of the natural
scientific model.
comparison of one strategy between qualitative and
quantitave with the similar issue of rigor:
- rigor in qualitative research is used as the central concept to
appraise the rigor of a qualitative study. it refers to quality.
authenticity. and trustfullness of finding qualitative
research,
- rigor in quantitative research refers to the soundness or
precision of a study in terms of planning. data cpollection.
analysis and reporting.
crediability in qualitative studt is depend upon the richness of
data , its quality, its characteristics but thecrediability in
quantitative data depends upon the quantity of data, no of data
present in study. as an issue of rigor the data collector should
thorough and being open to collect qualitative data in quality
study and the collector should thorough in collecting quantified
data in quantitative study.
for example:
among people how many smokers and non smokers are there and
after implementing action what is the number of outcome is measured
as quantitative rigor.
but among those people who are smoker a nd non smoker their
characteristics and generalisation of smoking. the cause of
smoking, cause effect relationship is qualitative rigor.