Culture is under attack. It is currently being blamed for most
implementation and execution problems. Culture "trumps everything,"
it is argued, usually without the empirical evidence to back up
such a claim. Corporate culture can create a "culture trap," a very
narrow way of thinking about culture and its role in organizational
problems, that can lead to poor decisions and frustrations as
managers try to affect culture and culture change with the wrong
methods.
First, virtually no one clearly defines what they mean by
“culture,” and when they do they usually get it wrong. Second,
virtually no one has read the original research that shows why
culture — when clearly defined — is so important, how it is formed,
and how it changes.
focus on four of the factors and conditions that affect it:
- Structure and Process. Large retail
stores like Wal-Mart or Sears, seeking to achieve decentralized
operations and create a culture of decision-making autonomy so
stores can get close to customers and local tastes, might ask
corporate and regional managers to leave stores alone and allow
store managers to do their own thing. Interference with the stores,
it is hoped, will decrease if managers are asked to butt out and
let local decisions and actions prevail. But what happens when the
next major problem arises? Corporate or regional managers swoop
down on the stores, bringing centralized solutions. As an
alternative, they could change structure instead. Increasing the
span of control for corporate or regional managers, for example,
would militate against involvement in the stores. Large spans
foster decentralization and autonomy at lower levels by making it
more difficult to actively meddle in a larger number of stores'
strategy and operations. Behavioral change of top managers can
foster behavioral and culture change in the stores.
- People. Bring in fresh blood and
thinking. Rotate managers with different views of competitive
conditions or operations. Supply different, needed skills or
capabilities from the outside. New people, ideas, and strategies
can lead to behavioral and performance changes that, in turn, can
affect new ways of thinking and culture change.
- Incentives. Randy Tobias once
remarked that the culture of the old AT&T rewarded "getting
older." The culture, over time, became stifling and bureaucratic.
Appeals to managers to change and team-building exercises didn't
work. But CEO Tobias and others after him changed incentives to
reward performance, not getting older. New people were attracted by
the new incentives and the opportunities presented (see previous
point) and the culture began to change. The same emphasis on
incentives can be seen over the years at J&J, GE, and other
companies. Incentives affect behavior and performance and attract
new resources and capabilities, which can lead to culture
change.
- Changing and Enforcing Controls. It's
important for companies to increase feedback, evaluate performance,
and take remedial action. Emphasis should be on tweaking strategy
implementation activities to achieve desired results. It's vital to
learn from performance, including mistakes, and use the lessons
learned to change incentives, resources, people, methods and
processes, and other factors to foster strategic and operating
goals. It's also necessary to hold managers accountable for
performance results, a formal mantra of Robert Wood Johnson, Jack
Welch, and many others. These actions or emphases will help to
shape new behaviors, task interactions, and ways of thinking that
will create or define a culture of learning and achievement.
But for a leader There are different steps to change
culture;-
1. Begin. Someone in a leadership position in
your organization (I’m counting on you, my reader, here) needs to
make the initial decision that cultural change is a priority, that
putting customers (and the employees, and vendors, and systems that
serve them) front and center matters.
2. Codify your cultural decision in a very short
statement. An explicit (but very brief) statement of what
that decision looks like: How you’re going to treat customers. How
you’re going to support employees. How you’re going to treat
vendors. Because making a decision once isn’t enough: you need a
clear way to refer back to it.
3. Change your hiring practices to reflect your (newly)
stated values. Every single employee,
from that moment forward, needs to be hired for reasons that are
congruent with your newly stated values. This is very, very
important.
4. Improve your onboarding: The way you bring
employees into a company is all-important. As I like to say, you
need to go overboard with the onboard. Overboard in stressing
(ideally, have the CEO there, personally stressing) the purpose of
employment at your organization, as opposed to the normal stuff
stressed at orientation: how to handle the minutiae of your job
description, signing in and out, and so forth.