Question

1. Using the paragraphs you wrote in the Module 1 Required: Maintaining Academic Integrity in Original Writing assignment, copy and paste the paragraphs below and complete the following:

   • Locate one peer-reviewed source in the University Library from EBSCOhost based on the topic of your paragraph.
   • Insert a paraphrase, direct quotation, or summary into your paragraph using the peer-reviewed source.
   • Create an APA-formatted in-text citation for the peer-reviewed source.
   • Create an APA-formatted reference for the peer-reviewed source.
2. Question 1

   1 Point

   Paste your paragraphs here and create an APA-formatted in-text citation for the peer-reviewed source.

What is academic integrity from module 1 was informing me on referring to the school reference center in the library to help from committing plagiarism. So, by doing all the steps correctly in writing a paper plagiarism would not occur. So, I feel as if you don't follow the academic integrity of using false information. So as a student and getting performance feedback by a professor need to staff helps in knowing and participating into university policy for regarding misconduct specific to the university, program and course. So as a student and a paper are plagiarized because of some time being lazy and waiting to the last minute to do a paper, but also by not doing the citation in the paper. Also, by just adding their name on someone else paper and turning it in. So, by doing these things for a paper It shows the lack of confidence one may have in self. But if they use the university resource material It may guide a student to use their own exposition or argument and words in a paper.

So, when your finding ways out to avoid plagiarism you should take into consideration the following: You can talk with your professor to get an idea of where you can start getting your information from. So if during your writing you find yourself with a question or concern about how to cite something or if it needs to be cited all ,do not hesitate to speak with your professor to gain ideas when you go to the center of writing excellence. So, a student should consider checking your work and add quotations for cited information that may be used in a paper. So, if you are still not sure that your work is correctly cited, consider checking the paper yourself before submitting it before It shows that you had plagiarized your paper. So by doing it will make you have confident and start making you pay more attention to your note taking and adding citations to your notes before you have doubt about your work early on and you can go back and add the necessary information. But if you don't remember all the steps and you still have doubt and you have followed the university center of writer excellence ,but also consider getting a fellow students who can provide feedback to help guide you in the right direction so it wouldn't occur.

3. Paste your paragraphs here and create an APA-formatted in-text citation for the peer-reviewed source.

4. Question 2

   1 Point

   Create an APA-formatted reference for the peer-reviewed source.

Answer 1

Question 1:-

Your Paragraph Including APA Citations

I believe that students plagiarize be of the failure to accurately give credit to other people’s work and make it seem like it is their own. There are times that students do not know how to document sources and ideas of others. Some of the possible consequences of plagiarism can be: Expell from school, expulsion from an academic institution, your work being destroyed and receive no credit for the assignment, and also can lead to legal action. As students we need to highly consider the gravity of the consequences. It is very important that we must avoid plagiarism at all cost. We may have to go over our work three to four times to make sure all our sources is properly cited because it will be worth the time to know that we have avoided this path of being dishonest with our assignments.

Question 2 :-

APA-formatted Reference for the Peer-Reviewed Source

Plagiarism Steven R Goodman1 and Robert T Mallet2 1 Editor-in-Chief, Experimental Biology and Medicine; 2 Associate Editor, EBM Physiology category Chair, SEBM Publication Committee DOI: 10.1258/ebm.2012.012e02 The US Department of Health and Human Services Regulation 42 CFR 93.103, PHS Policies on Research Misconduct, 1 which took effect on June 16, 2005, defines research misconduct as ‘... fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.’ This regulation further states ‘Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.’ Unfortunately, academic plagiarism, knowingly taking someone else’s processes, results or words, without giving appropriate credit, is being encountered with increasing frequency by all biomedical journals, including Experimental Biology and Medicine (EBM). Sophisticated software has been developed to examine submitted manuscripts for possible plagiarism. The mounting problem of plagiarism has forced the implementation of such measures to protect EBM and maintain its integrity. As a result of the increased awareness of plagiarism in biomedical journals, including ours, the Society of Experimental Biology and Medicine (SEBM) Council approved the following recommendations proposed by its SEBM Publication Committee in April 2012: ‘Accordingly, and based on our discussion with Dr Goodman, the Publication Committee recommends a three-tiered approach to sanctions: Level one: Limited duplication of text from the authors’ own published work, with somewhat more relaxed stringency for materials and methods: In these cases, the manuscript will be returned to the authors with instructions to rewrite/rephrase the duplicated text, before publication of the submission may proceed. If the materials and methods are heavily duplicated, the authors could be advised to reference their published work, thereby shortening that section. Level two: Substantial duplication of an author’s own work, or signifi- cant duplication of the work of others, will result in rejection of the manuscript. Level three: Duplication of an author’s own work so extensive that it could be considered an attempt to publish the same work twice [dual or redundant publication], or lifting of large chunks [sections] of text or data from the work of others, will result in rejection of the manuscript and, in addition, contacting the appropriate offi- cials at the author’s institution.’ Clarifications in parenthesis were added by the Editor-in-Chief. Effective July 1, 2012, all manuscripts thought to have a high likelihood of eventual publication in EBM will be evaluated by iThenticate plagiarism-detection software, which compares the manuscript text with a comprehensive database from the published literature. iThenticate will generate reports which will be sent to the assigned Associate Editor for review and possible further investigation. Findings of plagiarism requiring one of the sanctions described above will also be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief before sanctions are imposed. Although plagiarism cannot be tolerated, it is our sincere intention to implement these policies with fairness, caution and impartiality. Additional information on EBM’s plagiarism policy can be found in our Instructions to Authors. What can you do to pro-actively avoid unintentioned plagiarism within your own manuscripts? The answer is simple. Put your manuscripts through the same or similar plagiarism software. If you find the text substantially duplicates your own publications, modify your wording so that it does not repeat verbatim your previously published work. If you find your manuscript duplicates the work of other investigators, make sure that you indicate that you are using someone else’s words by the use of quotation marks and proper attribution in your reference section. If you are a first author, senior author and/or corresponding author, please ensure that this self-review for plagiarism is completed prior to submission. In the Council of Science Editors 2012 White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications under Authorship principles, it says ‘Individuals listed as authors should review and approve the manuscript before publication....The ultimate reason for identification of authors and other contributors is to establish accountability for the reported work.’2 Please take this responsibility seriously when submitting any manuscript to EBM. REFERENCES 1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct: Final Rule. Federal Register 2005;70:28370– 28400 2 Scott-Lichter D and the Editorial Policy Committee, Council of Science Editors. CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications, 2012 Update. 3rd Revised Edition. Wheat Ridge, CO: Council of Science Editors, 2012