In: Operations Management
Should a company identify and formally acknowledge its high-potential managers or should it be kept secret? Should managers know they are considered high-potential managers? Explain your position
answer in own words and include citations and real information. NOT just opinion
Recognizing employees as having high potential recognizes their
commitments to the organization, approves what they are doing, and
rouses them. Those not officially distinguished as high potentials
report they are bound to look for elective work in the close to
term than those in high-potential projects.
Being marked "high potential" shouldn't be a prize or a privilege.
High potentials are relied upon to work more enthusiastically and
take on more difficulties." That must be conveyed unmistakably if a
program is to succeed. In particular, the 'high-potential' mark
suggests a high degree of execution, increased by the readiness and
ability to develop. It implies that right now, you have the limit
and drive to take on progressively complex jobs. That limit and
drive may change after some time, so employees who aren't there now
need a pathway to control them toward expanding their potential.
That pathway ought to be founded on regular definitions and desires
and ought to incorporate managers prepared to draw in and empower
ability without limiting the accomplishments of those not in the
high-potential program. At the point when that foundation is set
up, at that point organizations can transparently talk about
high-potential projects. Deciding to be straightforward is an issue
of timing.
The characteristics of high potential managers are as follows:
There are a few challenges for high potential managers as well: