Question

Some experts agree that who we are is a result of Nurture—the social relationships or the influence of Socialization. Others argue that who we are is based on genetics. According to this belief, our basic temperaments and interests are set before birth. From this perspective, then, who we are depends on the mighty Nature.

Answer 1

The nature versus nurture debate is probably the most established issue in brain science. The discussion focuses on the general commitments of hereditary legacy and environmental elements to human development.The nature versus nurture banter includes the degree to which specific parts of conduct are a result of either acquired (i.e., hereditary) or gained (i.e., learned) impacts.
Nature is the thing that we consider as pre-wiring and is affected by hereditary legacy and other biological components.
Nurture is commonly taken as the impact of outer components after birth, e.g., the result of introduction, educational encounters and learning on a person.
Today, developmental psychologists seldom take enraptured situations with respect to most parts of advancement; rather, they explore the connection among natural and environmental impacts. The biopsychosocial model expresses that biological, mental, and social factors all assume a critical job in human turn of events. Environmental sources of info can influence the outflow of qualities, a relationship called quality environment collaboration. A person's qualities and their environment cooperate, conveying to and fro to make characteristics. The diathesis–stress model serves to investigate how biological or hereditary characteristics (diatheses) collaborate with environmental impacts (stressors) to deliver messes, for example, depression , anxiety, or schizophrenia.

Thanks:)...