Question

In: Chemistry

If 3 spots on a TLC plate have the following RF’S, A=0.43, B=0.89 and C=0.53 what...

If 3 spots on a TLC plate have the following RF’S, A=0.43, B=0.89 and C=0.53 what would be the order that the spots came off a column? What would happen if you increased the polarity of the solvent?

Solutions

Expert Solution

If 3 spots on a TLC plate have the following RF’S, A=0.43, B=0.89 and C=0.53 what would be the order that the spots came off a column? What would happen if you increased the polarity of the solvent?

On TLC plate retention factor (R.F) is defined as,

RF = (Distance travelled by compound)/(Distance travelled by solvent front)

For a mixture of compound distance travelled by solvent front is constant.

Hence, as distance travelled by compound increases RF value increases (In fraction denominator is constant, so with increase in numerator, fraction value increase)

The larger an Rf of a compound, the larger the distance it travels on the TLC plate. When comparing two different compounds run under identical chromatographic conditions, the compound with the larger Rf is less polar because it interacts less strongly with the polar adsorbent on the TLC plate.

Hence for the given compound increasing order of polarity (lowest first) is given as,

B(RF=0.89) < C(RF=0.53) < A(RF=0.43) …………………. (order reverse of RF value)

In column chromatographic separation:

A polar compound is used as mobile phase.

More polar the solvent (mobile phase) more it dissolves the polar compound in. This means the more polar compound move further.

Hence for A, B, C compounds the spots order from up to down is,

Same as above polarity order,

B(RF=0.89) < C(RF=0.53) < A(RF=0.43).

With increasing polarity we can have effective separation specially of B and C (which differs less in RF and polarity).

==================xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx====================


Related Solutions

A TLC plate showed two spots with Rf values of 0.25 and 0.26. The plate was...
A TLC plate showed two spots with Rf values of 0.25 and 0.26. The plate was removed from the developing chamber, the residual solvent was allowed to evaporate from the plate, and then the plate was returned to the developing chamber. What would you expect to see after the second development was complete?
A TLC plate showed two spots of Rf 0.25 and 0.26. The plate was dried carefully,...
A TLC plate showed two spots of Rf 0.25 and 0.26. The plate was dried carefully, and returned to the developing chamber. What would you expect to see after the second development was complete?
If a TLC plate was done in acetone and hexane which would have a higher rf...
If a TLC plate was done in acetone and hexane which would have a higher rf value: 1. Benzenaldehyde or 1,4-Pentadien-3-one, 1,5-diphenyl-? 2.Benzenaldehyde or 2,2’-(phenylmethylene)bis(5,5-dimethylcyclohexane-1,3-dione)? 3. Benzenaldehyde or 3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-9-phenyl-3,4,5,6,7,9-hexahydro-1H-xanthene-1,8(2H)-dione?
Which compound will have the larger Rf value on a SiO2 TLC plate using 10% ethyl...
Which compound will have the larger Rf value on a SiO2 TLC plate using 10% ethyl acetate/hexane as eluent: 3-decanone or 3-decanol, toluene or benzoic acid, cyclooctane or cyclooctanone? Why?
Which compound will have the larger Rf value on a SiO2 TLC plate using 10% ethyl...
Which compound will have the larger Rf value on a SiO2 TLC plate using 10% ethyl acetate/ hexane as eluent: 3-decanone or 3-decanol, toluene or benzoic acid, cyclooctane or cyclooctanone? Why?
The following data was collected from a TLC plate for 4 different compounds. The distance's traveled...
The following data was collected from a TLC plate for 4 different compounds. The distance's traveled by each is shown below: Spot A: 8.2 cm Spot B: 0.7 cm Spot C: 6.5 cm Spot D: 1.3 cm The spotting line was placed 1.5 cm above the base and the solvent traveled 10.5 cm from the bottom of the plate. Calculate the Rf value for each compound. My answers to this were A: 0.78 B: 0.067 C: 0.62 D: 0.12 I...
A mixture of 4-methylphenol and 4-methylcyclohexanol was run on a TLC plate using 3:1 hexane:ethyl acetate...
A mixture of 4-methylphenol and 4-methylcyclohexanol was run on a TLC plate using 3:1 hexane:ethyl acetate as the eluent. Only one spot was seen using a UV lamp. Does this mean that both spots have the same Rf or is there another explanation? How might you solve this problem?
If you have 3 stocks (A), (B), & (C). The following are the rates of returns...
If you have 3 stocks (A), (B), & (C). The following are the rates of returns in the last 5 years for the three stocks: Stock A Stock B Stock C 30 60 20 20 35 30 40 20 40 25 25 35 35 20 40 Required Calculate the expected returns for individual stocks A, B & C. Calculate the expected risk for individual stocks A, B & C. Calculate the covariance and correlation between A&B stocks and A&C stocks...
If you have 3 stocks (A), (B), & (C). The following are the rates of returns...
If you have 3 stocks (A), (B), & (C). The following are the rates of returns in the last 5 years for the three stocks: Stock A Stock B Stock C 30 60 20 20 35 30 40 20 40 25 25 35 35 20 40 Required Calculate the expected returns for individual stocks A, B & C. Calculate the expected risk for individual stocks A, B & C. Calculate the covariance and correlation between A&B stocks and A&C stocks...
could you have achieved a better separation on your TLC plate between aspartic acid and phenylalanine?
could you have achieved a better separation on your TLC plate between aspartic acid and phenylalanine?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT