Two people are waiting for their appointments at a neurology clinic. Dani has a seizure disorder and her neurologist wants to look at her overall pattern of brain activity to determine the location of the seizures. Paul’s physician suspects that he has a tumor and needs to get a clear picture of his brain’s anatomy.

1. What type of test is Dani’s physician most likely to order?
   1. PET Scans
   2. CT Scan
   3. MRI
   4. fMRI
   5. EEG
2. What type of test would Paul’s physician order?
   1. PET Scans
   2. CT Scan
   3. MRI
   4. fMRI
   5. EEG
3. What is the primary difference between Dani and Paul's types of tests?

how jane elliots video impacted in the students and how much importance this video have in our current society?

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=jane+elliott%27s+blue+eyes+brown+eyes+experiment+

In 200 words State if you agree or disagree with the comments made about the answer provided to the Scenario and why? PLEASE PROVIDE A SOLUTION

Task: Outline the steps needed to resolve the issue of Scenario part 2 by:

• How will you would adjust your plan to include any actions you will take?

• Provide your reply back to HR.

Scenario Part 2:

Workplace unrest Part two provides additional information based on talking with your people. Jill: You met Monday afternoon and had a positive and productive discussion. She reiterated what HR had said to me concerning email and talking to Jill. Jill felt she was not challenged job wise and that her and Jack were not getting along. She told you about what she considered bullying the day that people thought she was sick and Jack ordered her into the conference room. Jill stated she was not sick and Jack wanted to send her home and would not let up. She also discussed her working relationship with Jack that they were sometime at odds as she is a type A personality. Jill ended the conversation with that she wants to be challenged and work things out with Jack.

Jack:

You met with Jack right after he got back from vacation. Jack was a little taken back concerning the incident as he stated that Jill turned around waived a finger saying “you’re pissing me off” and ordering her into the conference room. Jack stated that he was concerned as were others in the work area because Jill had just gotten back from Africa and was sick. He said that he did order her to the conference room. Jack went on to say that Jill was having a hard time finding her role and continually asked what her job entailed. Jack thought he was patient in trying to explain her role to include finding her more challenging work. Jack also stated that he is looking for other work because her main project is about done.

Tami:

You talk with Tami in private who was in the area when the above confrontation occurred over Jill being sick. Tami stated both Jill and Jack got out of control. You brought up this point up (both out of control) to both Jill and Jack and they both nodded in acknowledgement. Tami was nervous and really did not have much more to say other than Jack and Jill were at odds with each other.

ANSWER:

In the given case study, Jill and Jack have been shown as colleagues who have misunderstood each other. From the point of view of Jill, Jack is guilty as he called him to conference room with order and told her to go home. She found him to be rude and authoritative. The reason for her to feel this is the command Jack gave her for coming to conference room and to go to home. From the point of view of Jill, he tried to prove himself right and said that Jill was sick as all of the office members observed and also said that he ordered her to the conference room but the reason for the command was not an authority but to ask her health and to help her in going home. From Tami it was confirmed that both Jack and Jill were rude to each other and were out of control. As a mediator or the one to solve this issue, the plan of action will be to make Jack and Jill confront each other. To make them understand the reason from each other's point of view about the rude behaviour. To make Jack understand that Jill was not that sick and was not willing to go home rather wanted to work and even if he was concerned, but the concern should have been shown in a mild manner and not an authoritative one, especially in front of the other staff. To make Jill understand that Jack was not willing to insult her rather he wanted to help her thinking she was not well. To the HR, the reply would be to frame policies to handle such concerns and issues amongst colleagues and provide space for personal health in the busy schedule and work pressure. The reply to HR would contain the fact that Jack was willing to care for his colleague and Jill felt insulted because of the authoritative way Jill used to help her out. It would also contain the fact that the other staff, like Tami, felt that both of them were out of control and a situation arise which could have been avoided. HR would have to frame policies to make the workplace a healthier workplace to increase the efficiency of the staff and avoid such arguments in future.

Comments:

I will say from a Apolitical standpoint your post provided no clarity as to what procedures will be taken to ensure this specific incident will not happen again. What is your reasoning for calling Tammy to the conference room to confront Jack and Jill if she was nervous about speaking with you in the initial interview. You already stated that you had a witness and presented both individuals with the information regarding the incident. Also, what is the solution that needs to be reached to ensure this specific incident doesn't happen again? The scenario said that both Jack and Jill were in the wrong, what is going to be done if this happens again? What if Jill was really sick and was just being insubordinate with her superior? The clarity of the scenario is unclear but with an imagination I think more can be done and a clearer reply to HR can be provided.

At which point in the play do you think that Oedipus stops being a good leader? Or, to put it another way, at which point in the play do you think that Oedipus begins to act and / or make decisions that are not wise?

Directions: Create a timeline with the 10 key events and dates of either the

                         Enlightenment or Scientific Revolution

Example:

1686 = Sir Isaac Newton publishes his “Principia Mathematic”. The Principia is

              considered one of the most important works in the history of science.

briefly, 2 pages long explain How did the Enlightenment and the Great Awakening impact the American Revolution?

> Our perception of the physical world is influenced by our expectations. This general rule of perception extends to people as well. Our evaluations are colored by our past experiences with a person or by other cues like the way they dress. How do you think you would have evaluated the behavior of the characters in this activity if you had initially been told which one had been diagnosed with a mental disorder?

> Summarize the personal issues that Steve Jobs had in his life.

> Using the biopsychosocial model, explain how the factors in Jobs’ life may have contributed to his illness.

> Steve Jobs’ achievements are certainly not representative of the cultural norms. Do these behaviors make him abnormal? Why or why not?

> What is social comparison? How can it help explain the “Groupon phenomenon”?

>What conditions would increase or decrease the likelihood of an individual using the coupon for which she or he had paid, using the Groupon service?

> Have you ever used Groupon? In what ways do you think that Groupon would affect social cognition?

> Researchers from the University of Toronto Scarborough conducted two experiments that looked at the effect of two different types of motivational intervention on prejudice reduction. Summarize the two types of motivational intervention that were used in their experiments.

> If programs focusing on reducing prejudice are actually increasing prejudice, how should the issue of prejudice be addressed?

> Even though researchers now know that reducing prejudice needs to focus on motivational interventions that are more personal in nature, the authors suggest that controlling prejudice reaction practices are tempting. What benefits do controlling motivational interventions have for prejudice programs?

Briefly summarize intro to logic. Make sure that you include the following logical terms:

Categorical propositions

Categorical syllogisms

Propositional logic

Predicate logic

d. List five reasons why maintaining a successful household could be difficult.

How would a behaviorist explain motivation? How would a cognitivist explain motivation? Here is a more difficult one: how would a freudian explain motivation?

1. The romantic image of “community” is “gemeinschaft”—where everyone at the table has similar backgrounds and values. How can strong ties and social capital be built in a diverse community (“gesellschaft”)? Choose two unrelated groups in your area and brainstorm ways you could work to increase networks and shared values to create a greater social capital.

Thirteen-year-old Ryan has begun to challenge many of his parents' values and to express his own set of highly idealistic standards. Compare and contrast the explanations for Ryan's behavior that would be given by Kohlberg and by Erikson.

According to Appelbaum, what can we do to solve the current privacy issues?

1. Metrosexual can be defined as:

2. A social fact can be best defined as:

3. A controversial (at the time) claim made by sexologists was that women were