The market analysis of Apple Inc.:

Nature of Demand

In your opinion, does descartes second very certian test distinguish humans from machines? or is it insufficiant?

Your response must be at least 5 paragraphs.

Case 7-2 regards lying to a patient in order to help her get off of sleeping pills that she is addicted to. She believes wrongly that she cannot sleep without the pills and presumably the doctor cannot convince her otherwise. So he arranges with the Pharmacist to have her sleeping pills replaced slowly with placebos without her knowledge. Mrs. Abrahams then does benefit from the deception because she is able to sleep with the placebo by the time the titration is finished. This is a conflict between medical paternalism and truth-telling. Legally he is in the wrong but ethically he is doing something that really does benefit the patient. The Pharmacist is also in the wrong for charging the woman for placebo and mislabeling the prescription. There are violations of law all over this case. Yet, it is benefiting the patient because of the unique circumstances of the patient. Do you think the doctor and the Pharmacist are doing the right thing or the wrong thing? If you believe they are doing the wrong thing what should they do instead? If it is the right thing, how do you justify violating the law? Our authors distinguish between outright lying and failing to tell the whole truth. That certainly is a valid distinction but is this a case of not telling the whole truth or is it a case of outright lying? How do you think Mrs. Abraham would feel if she found out? Do you think she would be thankful or would she sue? What moral theories or principles would you appeal to?

The analysis of Apple Inc.:

Regulatory Environment (Present and anticipated)

I am writing an essay about Minorities and stereotypes in The Big Bang Theory. What types of stereotypes they are using and how they are addressing in the show.   

Here is the paragraph you can look the answer. Please help me with that and feel free to look that up.

"Weitekamp says, “The show itself starts from the idea that scientists and nerds have a certain number of stereotypes and then the characters, I think, are really written in ways that both play off of and sometimes play against those existing stereotypes.”

“Part of the popularity of The Big Bang Theory has come out of it being the right show at the right moment where there’s been an evolution in the social acceptance of geeks or nerds. Being able to work on computers, to know about science to know these kinds of things, and seeing that as a new kind of ‘geek chic,’ and this show then tapped into that very effectively,” says Weitekamp.

“It’s unusual to have a depiction of scientists in a comedy not in a drama. They tend to be the side character who comes in with the answer, or who is so obsessed with their own work that they have actually created the problem,” says Weitekamp.

Finally, says Weitekamp, “If readers get a chance to look at my academic look at The Big Bang Theory,and see how science, scientists, knowledge about science, and how science works, it might allow readers to think a little about the ways in which science gets depiced on television and in the movies.”

Reflection Paper

Topic: What does it mean to be part of a culture?

Write a two-page, double-spaced reflection on the topic below. The readings, discussions, and videos you have done this week will help you write your paper.?

This assignment is designed to provoke thought about autonomy of one's body and the associated laws that govern decision making.

https://www.yahoo.com/health/one-womans-quest-to-die-with-dignity-and-what-it-means-99374572007.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/court-hears-case-of-teen-refusing-cancer-treatment/ and http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/17-year-old-girl-refuses-cancer-treatment-state-forces-her-to-undergo-treatment.454356503/

Chapters 5 and 6 emphasizes the importance of patient choice based on an individual's need to achieve a since of control and empowerment. Notice if you find yourself judging too quickly or harshly the care options and dying styles chosen by someone who is terminally ill. Even though a patient's choice may seem wrong or odd to you for any number of reasons, it is important to acknowledge that a critical aspect of such choices is that they may not be made solely by the health care providers or family members.

Click on the URLs above. What are your thoughts on this topic? Should people have the right to decide how or when they die? How is the woman's journey in the first article different from the young lady in the second article? Are these issues legal or moral? Construct a well written commentary between 400- 450 words that addresses both articles and the information in the text book.

Make your initial post by Wednesday at 2:00 PM. Read one of your peers commentary whose views differ from yours and engage in a discussion with that student. This means, you need to make your initial post (your commentary), engage in a discussion with someone whose views differ from yours, and respond to whoever makes a comment to your commentary. You have until Saturday at midnight to participate in this discussion.

Compare and contrast a bad job that you have held and a job that provided you with a degree of satisfaction

Please watch A TV in the Baby Bottle (52:00) from Films on demand. Next post a summary of the video. Finally, can children really learn from targeted entertainment in the same manner as they can from live human beings?

This book, When bad things happen to good people by Krushner.

Please write a 1 page summary of the book and another 1 page of your considered response to the book. In total two pages.

Provide 3 biblical scripts that is against the captial punishment/death penalty and 3 that is for capital punishment/death penalty and explain why please and thank you.

COUPLE INTERVIEW

You are asked to interview a couple who has been married or cohabitating for at least five continuous years and write a paper which summarizes both the interview content and your personal observations and thoughts about the relationship. The interview must be conducted with both parties present at the same time and the interview must be a minimum of 45 minutes long.

Use the following outline to structure your interview and paper:

I. Introduction: Introduce your topic (marriage and family life) and include information about the couple. Be sure to use a fictitious name to protect the confidentiality of the couple. Include information about the couple such as; race, religion, ethnicity, ages, years together as a couple, number and ages of children (if any), how long have you known them, why did you select them, is this a same-sex couple, inter-faith, inter-racial, etc.

II. Body: Address the following issues at a minimum:

A. The history of the relationship – how did they meet, what was the initial attraction, what made them decide to commit to a long-term relationship, etc.?

B. How do they structure their family – traditional vs. non-traditional roles, occupational and child care concerns, etc.? Be sure to refer to your textbook for appropriate terms and definitions.

C. How do they communicate? Pay attention to their statements and body language, as well as your personal observations and experiences. How do they make family decisions?

D. What have been the most challenging times in their relationship? How have they worked through those issues?

III. Analysis:  Address the following items, at a minimum:

A. Do you consider this to be a successful relationship? Why or why not?

B. What “type” of marriage or relationship would you categorize this relationship to be? Explain your answer.

C. What qualities of this relationship would you like to have in your own relationship? How would you create these qualities in your relationship? What type of efforts would you be willing to make to retain those qualities in your relationship?

D. What qualities would you want to avoid? How would you avoid them? What preventative measure would you take in your relationships?

E. What have you learned about committed relationships from your interview with this couple? How will you apply this information to your personal life?

What changes in children’s school and other socialization experiences will enable girls to acquire different occupational skills? Please explain with sufficient detail.

What are the key biological, psychological, sociocultural, and life-cycle forces that should inform training programs concerning sexual harassment in the workplace? Please address this question with sufficient detail.

Identify and explain the primary priorities and responsibilities of the IRB.