According to Pablo Picasso, "Every act of creation is, first of all, an act of destruction."

a) What do you think must be destroyed?

b) Is it possible to apply Picasso's creative philosophy in your workplace?

c) Why and why not?

what is the person in environment perspective?

The Declaration of Independence contends that "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive" of individual life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, " it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it". Under what circumstances, if any, would you personally exercise this right? Specifically, what conditions would have to prevail for you to act to alter or abolish your form of government? What exactly would you do in order to achieve this?

Explain a specific example in which you utilized problem solving strategies to resolve a real world problem.

How are universities and K-12 institutions supporting their students, staff, and faculty amidst the pandemic? How has the pandemic influenced dietary habits among students?

Depression is the most common disorder in the world, what are the symptoms? What should you do if someone you know is depressed? Use your readings to explain your answers. write at least 250 words.

Review the Medsker and McDorman article and Nixon's resignation address. How is the President treated as the accused by the courts? The Justices admit they were not "required to proceed against the president as against an ordinary individual" (United States v. Nixon 708, 715). What do you think Aristotle would have thought of this?

In the essay " Small change: Why the revolution Will Not Be Tweeted" by Malcolm Galdwell. The most important comparison Galdwell makes here is between revolutionary moments pre- and post Internet. How does he use this comparison not only to make his point but also to structure his essay. Could he had structured it other ways and would they have differed and been less effective?

Do relativism and subjectivism generate contradictions? Why might someone accuse the theories of doing so? How could a relativist or subjectivist respond?

Do relativism and subjectivism generate contradictions? Why might someone accuse the theories of doing so? How could a relativist or subjectivist respond?

Aristotle and Kant - then read the following question completely before you begin writing your reply:

You have been on vacation in Bali with your wife and 18-year-old son. You’re now at the airport ready to return home. The three of you are getting ready to board your plane when an armed officer approaches with a drug-sniffing dog. You have all the suitcases with you and your wife - and the dog sniffs at your bag and then your wife’s bag, but passes over them. When the snooty-pooch gets to your son’s bag, the dog begins to get far more active. You look over at your son and he’s looking a little nervous. You know he has smoked marijuana while on vacation, but generally he’s a good kid. You certainly didn’t think he’d be stupid enough to bring it back on the plane with him. At first you feel angry that he would do such a thing and start planning your responsibility lecture, but then you remember that you are in Bali - and they have a zero-tolerance policy on drugs, meaning your son could be jailed for life, or worse, executed. You look at your wife and realize she has come to the same conclusion and has gone pale with fear. The armed officer with the dog is now extremely interested with every sniff the dog takes and looks directly at you and asks you to open to the bag – and you comply. As the officer begins to take things out of your bag, to your horror you see a small quantity of marijuana stashed with some other items – which you recognize as your son’s. The officer looks at you and asks, “Whose bag is this?” You realize you must answer – and fast. You see your wife in the corner of your eye, and she is about to step forward and claim it as her own. What should you do? Consider your answer based on either the ideas of Aristotle or Kant (select one). Your task is to select the one you think best resolves this situation. Explain the theory, the facts; then decide why one is better than the other based on your understanding of each of these 2 philosophers, Aristotle and Kant. Conclude your answer explaining how/why your selected philosopher's solution is best. Your answer should be approximately 3-4 complete paragraphs.

Identify three ways to deal with stress based on your readings.  discuss how you personally deal with stress. write at least 250 word

1. Imagine an empty chair in front of you.
2. Think about a relationship in which you are currently experiencing conflict or in which you have an unresolved conflict or issue from the past.
3. Mentally “place” the person with whom you are having conflict in the empty chair. Vividly imagine that person—what they look like, what they are wearing, and how they would be sitting. “Talk” freely to that person about the conflict.
4. Become that person sitting in the chair and consider how that person would respond to what you had to say. Respond, as if you were the other person, from that person’s perspective.

Compare and contrast healthy stress coping mechanisms with unhealthy coping mechanisms. Research some good coping mechanisms can be taught to teenagers in response to peer pressure, bullying.