Question

In: Chemistry

Below are shown three Lineweaver-Burk plots for enzyme reactions that have been carried out in the presence, or absence, of an inhibitor.

Below are shown three Lineweaver-Burk plots for enzyme reactions that have been carried out in the presence, or absence, of an inhibitor.

Part A

Indicate what type of inhibition is predicted based on Lineweaver-Burk plot.

  mixed inhibition
  competitive inhibition
  uncompetitive inhibition

 

Part B

Indicate which line corresponds to the reaction without inhibitor and which line corresponds to the reaction with inhibitor present.

  red - without inhibitor, blue - with inhibitor
  blue - without inhibitor, red - with inhibitor

 

Part C

Indicate what type of inhibition is predicted based on Lineweaver-Burk plot.

  mixed inhibition
  competitive inhibition
  uncompetitive inhibition

 

Part D

Indicate which line corresponds to the reaction without inhibitor and which line corresponds to the reaction with inhibitor present.

8.13e.png

Indicate which line corresponds to the reaction without inhibitor and which line corresponds to the reaction

  blue - without inhibitor, red - with inhibitor
  red - without inhibitor, blue - with inhibitor

 

Part E

Indicate what type of inhibition is predicted based on Lineweaver-Burk plot.

8.13c.png

  mixed inhibition
  competitive inhibition
  uncompetitive inhibition

 

Part F

Indicate which line corresponds to the reaction without inhibitor and which line corresponds to the reaction with inhibitor present.

8.13f.png

  blue - without inhibitor, red - with inhibitor
  red - without inhibitor, blue - with inhibitor

Solutions

Expert Solution

Part-A

The lineweaver-Burk equation for the mixed inhibition is, \(\frac{1}{v_{0}}=\left(\frac{\alpha K_{m}}{V_{\max }}\right) \frac{1}{[s]}+\frac{\alpha^{\prime}}{V_{\max }}\)

Here, \(v_{0}\) is the initial velocity, \([s]\) is the substrate concentration,

$$ \alpha^{\prime}=\left(1+\frac{[\mathrm{I}]}{K_{I}^{\prime}}\right), \alpha=\left(1+\frac{[\mathrm{I}]}{K_{I}}\right) $$

\([\mathrm{I}]\) is the inhibitor concnetration, \(V_{\max }\) is the maximum velocity \(K_{I}^{\prime}\) and \(K_{I}^{\prime}\) are the dissociation constants, and \(K_{m}\) is the Michael's constant.

The corresponding lineweaver-Burk plot for the mixed inhibition is shown below:

Plot 1: Lineweaver-Burk plot in the presence of mixed inhibitor

The curled arrow which is in anti-clock wise direction indicates increasing inhibitor concentration.

Compare the specified plot with the plot-1. Thus, based on the plot the enzyme reaction is a mixed inhibition type.

 

Part-B

Compare the specified plot with plot-1, Thus, the blue line indicates the line equation without inhibitor and, the red line indicates the line equation with inhibitor.

 

Part-C

The lineweaver-Burk equation for the competitive inhibition is, \(\frac{1}{v_{0}}=\left(\frac{\alpha K_{m}}{V_{\max }}\right) \frac{1}{[s]}+\frac{1}{V_{\max }}\)

The corresponding lineweaver-Burk plot for the competitive inhibition is shown below:

Plot 2: Lineweaver-Burk plot in the presence of a competitive inhibitor

Compare the specified plot with the plot-2. Thus, based on the plot the enzyme reaction is competitive inhibition type.

 

Part-D

Compare the specified plot with plot-2, Thus, the blue line indicates the line equation without inhibitor and, the red line indicates the line equation with inhibitor.

 

Part-E

The lineweaver-Burk equation for the uncompetitive inhibition is, \(\frac{1}{v_{0}}=\left(\frac{K_{m}}{V_{\max }}\right) \frac{1}{[s]}+\frac{\alpha^{\prime}}{V_{\max }}\)

The corresponding lineweaver-Burk plot for the uncompetitive inhibition is shown below:

Plot 3: Lineweaver-Burk plot in the presence of the uncompetitive inhibitor

Compare the specified plot with the plot-3. Thus, based on the plot the enzyme reaction is an uncompetitive inhibition type.

 

Part-F

Compare the specified plot with plot-3, Thus, the blue line indicates the line equation without inhibitor and, the red line indicates the line equation with inhibitor.

Related Solutions

3. The kinetics of an enzyme are studied in the absence and presence of an inhibitor...
3. The kinetics of an enzyme are studied in the absence and presence of an inhibitor (A). The intial rate is given as a function of substrat concentration in the table. V0 V0 [S] (mmol/L) no Inhibitor Inhibitor A 1.25 1.72 0.98 1.67 2.04 1.17 2.5 2.63 1.47 5.00 3.33 1.96 10.00 4.17 2.38 (a) What kind oof competitor is inhibition is involved (competitive, noncompetitive, uncompetitive)? [Please Provide Graph] (b) Determine Vmax and Km in the absence and presence of...
Students collected Beta-fructosidase enzyme activity data in the presence and absence of an unknown inhibitor. P-nitrophenol...
Students collected Beta-fructosidase enzyme activity data in the presence and absence of an unknown inhibitor. P-nitrophenol was used as a read out for enzyme activity. Quantity of product was determined from the absorbance of each sample after 5 minutes of reaction. Using the information, complete the table below and create a properly labeled Lineweaver burke plot with the appropriate axes and best fit lines for the data, in excel (graph is worth 6pts). Using this plot, calculate the approximate Vmax...
Verdigris, copper (II) acetate monohydrate, was prepared using the three reactions shown below. In a 125...
Verdigris, copper (II) acetate monohydrate, was prepared using the three reactions shown below. In a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask were combined 4.20 g copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate, 35 mL of a 3.0 M aqueous solution of ammonia, and 25 mL of water (density 0.997 g/mL). The light blue solid CuSO4·3Cu(OH)2 that formed was collected by vacuum filtration and combined with 40. mL of water and 8.5 mL of a 2.0 M aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide in a second 125...
1) Three new-product ideas have been suggested. These ideas have been rated as shown in the...
1) Three new-product ideas have been suggested. These ideas have been rated as shown in the Table below Product* Criteria A B C Weight (%) Development cost P F VG 10 Sales prospects VG E G 15 Producibility P F G 10 Competitive advantage E VG F 15 Technical risk P F VG 20 Patent protection F F VG 10 Compatibility with strategy VG F F 20 100 * P = poor, F = fair, G = good, VG =...
The data shown below for the dependent​ variable, y, and the independent​ variable, x, have been...
The data shown below for the dependent​ variable, y, and the independent​ variable, x, have been collected using simple random sampling. x 10 13 16 11 20 17 16 13 16 17 y 90 50 30 80 10 10 40 70 20 30 a. Develop a simple linear regression equation for these data. b. Calculate the sum of squared​ residuals, the total sum of​ squares, and the coefficient of determination. c. Calculate the standard error of the estimate. d. Calculate...
The data shown below for the dependent variable, y, and the independent variable, x, have been...
The data shown below for the dependent variable, y, and the independent variable, x, have been collected using simple random sampling. x 10 15 17 11 19 18 17 15 17 18 y 120 150 170 120 170 180 160 140 180 190 a. Develop a simple linear regression equation for these data. b. Calculate the sum of squared residuals, the total sum of squares, and the coefficient of determination. c. Calculate the standard error of the estimate. d. Calculate...
You have been given the expected return data shown in the first table on the three...
You have been given the expected return data shown in the first table on the three assets - F, G, and H - over the period 2016-2019 Expected Return Expected Return Expected Return Year Asset F Asset G Asset H 2016 16% 17% 14% 2017 17 16 15 2018 18 15 16 2019 19 14 17 Using these assets, you have isolated the three investment alternatives shown in the following table. Alternative Investment 1 100% of asset F 2 50%...
he data shown below for the dependent​ variable, y, and the independent​ variable, x, have been...
he data shown below for the dependent​ variable, y, and the independent​ variable, x, have been collected using simple random sampling. x 10 14 17    11 19 18 17 14 17 18 y 120 140 190 140 190 180 180 160 170 190 .a. Develop a simple linear regression equation for these data. .b. Calculate the sum of squared​ residuals, the total sum of​squares, and the coefficient of determination. .c. Calculate the standard error of the estimate. .d. Calculate...
Which are the three yield curve factors that have been shown to affect Treasury security returns...
Which are the three yield curve factors that have been shown to affect Treasury security returns and which has the strongest impact? A) Slope, Curve and Weight; with slope being the most impactful B) Level Slope and Curve; with level being the most impactful C) Level Slope and Convexity; with convexity being the most impactful D) Spot, forward and par; with spot being the most impactful
Portfolio analysis You have been given the return data shown in the first table on three...
Portfolio analysis You have been given the return data shown in the first table on three assets—F, G, and H—over the period 2010–2013. Expected return Year Asset F Asset G Asset H 2010 16% 17% 14% 2011 17% 16% 15% 2012 18% 15% 16% 2013 19% 14% 17% Using these assets, you have isolated the three investment alternatives shown in the following table: Alternative Investment 1 100% of asset F 2 50% of asset F and 50% of asset G...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT