Question

In: Chemistry

Verdigris, copper (II) acetate monohydrate, was prepared using the three reactions shown below. In a 125...

Verdigris, copper (II) acetate monohydrate, was prepared using the three reactions shown

below. In a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask were combined 4.20 g copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate, 35 mL of a 3.0 M aqueous solution of ammonia, and 25 mL of water (density 0.997 g/mL). The light blue solid CuSO4·3Cu(OH)2 that formed was collected by vacuum filtration and combined with 40. mL of water and 8.5 mL of a 2.0 M aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide in a second 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask to give the blue solid copper (II) hydroxide. The blue solid was collected by vacuum filtration, transferred to a third 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask, and combined with 40. mL of a 0.82 M aqueous acetic acid solution. The resultant solution was evaporated to one-half of its original volume; the dark green crystals of verdigris that formed were isolated by vacuum filtration. Collected was 1.25 g of solid verdigris. Calculate the percent yield of verdigris.

CuSO4·5H2O(aq) + 6NH3(aq) → CuSO4·3Cu(OH)2(s) +3(NH4)2SO4(aq) +14H2O(l)   (1)

CuSO4·3Cu(OH)2(s) + 2NaOH(aq) → 4Cu(OH)2(s) + Na2SO4(aq)           (2)

Cu(OH)2(s) + 2HC2H3O2(aq) → Cu(C2H3O2)2·H2O(aq) + H2O(l)               (3)

Solutions

Expert Solution

Ans. Reaction 1: Moles of CuSO4.5H2O taken = Mass/ Molar mass

                                                = 4.20 g / (249.686 g / mol)

                                                = 0.01682113 mol

Moles of NH3 taken = Molarity x Volume of solution in liters

                                    = 3.0 M x 0.035 L

                                    = 0.105 mol

Experimental molar ration of reactants = Moles of CuSO4.5H2O : Moles of NH3

                                    = 0.01682113 mol : 0.105 mol

                                    = 1 : 6.24

In balanced reaction, 1 mol CuSO4.5H2O reacts with 6 mol NH3.

Since experimental ratio of NH3 is greater than 6 when that of CuSO4.5H2O is kept constant at 1 mol, NH3 is the reagent in excess.

So, CuSO4.5H2O is the limiting reactant.

The formation of product follows stoichiometry of limiting reactant.

Thus, Moles of product CuSO4.3Cu(OH)2 formed = moles of CuSO4.5H2O taken

So, Moles of product CuSO4.3Cu(OH)2 formed = 0.01682113 mol

# Reaction 2:

We have (from #1), Moles of product CuSO4.3Cu(OH)2 formed = 0.01682113 mol

Moles of NaOH taken = 2.0 M x 0.0085 L = 0.017 mol

Experimental molar ration of reactants = Moles of CuSO4.3Cu(OH)2: Moles of NaOH

                                    = 0.01682113 mol : 0.017 mol

                                    = 1 : 1.01

Theoretical molar ration of reactants = Moles of CuSO4.3Cu(OH)2: Moles of NaOH

                                    = 1 : 2 (in balanced reaction)

Comparing the experimental and theoretical molar ration, the moles of NaOH is less than 2 when that of CuSO4.3Cu(OH)2 is kept constant at 1 mol.

Thus, NaOH is the limiting reactant.

The formation of product follows the stoichiometry of limiting reactant.

So,

Moles of product Cu(OH)2 formed = (2 / 4) x moles of NaOH

                                                = (2 / 4) x x 0.017 mol

                                                = 0.0085 mol                      

# Reaction 3:

We have (from #2), moles of Cu(OH)2 formed = 0.0085 mol

Moles of acetic acid taken = 0.82 M x 0.040 mol = 0.0328 mol

Experimental molar ration of reactants = Moles of Cu(OH)2: Moles of CH3COOH

                                    = 0.0085 mol : 0.0328 mol

                                    = 1 : 3.86

Theoretical molar ration of reactants = Moles of Cu(OH)2: Moles of CH3COOH = 1 : 2

# Comparing the experimental and theoretical molar ration, the moles of CH3COOH is greater than 2 when that of Cu(OH)2 is kept constant at 1 mol.

Thus, CH3COOH is the reagent in excess and Cu(OH)2 is the limiting reactant.

The formation of product follows the stoichiometry of limiting reactant.

So,

Moles of product Cu(C2H3O2)2.2H2O formed = Moles of Cu(OH)2 = 0.0085 mol

Therefore,

Theoretical moles of Cu(C2H3O2)2.2H2O formed = 0.0085 mol

Theoretical mass of Cu(C2H3O2)2.2H2O formed = Theoretical moles x Molar mass

                                                            = 0.0085 mol x (217.6658 g/ mol)

                                                            = 1.850 g

Now,

% yield = (Mass of product obtained / Theoretical mass of product produced) x 100

                        = (1.25 g / 1.85 g) x 100

                        = 67.568 %


Related Solutions

1) The molar solubility of copper(II) sulfide in a 0.266 M copper(II) acetate solution is _______ M.
1) The molar solubility of copper(II) sulfide in a 0.266 M copper(II) acetate solution is _______ M. 2) The maximum amount of cobalt(II) carbonate that will dissolve in a 0.258 M cobalt(II) nitrate solution is _______  M.
For a Schiff’s base condensation reaction using copper (II) acetate, salicaldehyde in methanol along with methylamine...
For a Schiff’s base condensation reaction using copper (II) acetate, salicaldehyde in methanol along with methylamine (5.2 ml, 33% in ethanol) should you/should you not use anhydrous sodium acetate? Why/why not?
what is the molecular, ionic, net ionic for : 1) copper ii acetate + hydrosulfuric acid...
what is the molecular, ionic, net ionic for : 1) copper ii acetate + hydrosulfuric acid 2) copper ii sulfate + hydrosulfuric acid 3) sulfuric acid + barium hydroxide state state designations (l, s, aq, g etc)
If an acetate buffer solution was prepared using method 1 and it was supposed to have...
If an acetate buffer solution was prepared using method 1 and it was supposed to have a pH of 4.7 but it actually came out to 4.9, what could be done to adjust the pH back down to 4.7 without completely remaking the solution and without altering the total amount of conjugate particles (HA + A‐)? Method 1 Measure out 15.0 mL of 0.10 M HC2H3O2 and 15.0 mL of 0.10 M NaC2H3O2. Measure and record the pH of the...
If an acetate buffer solution was prepared using method 1 and it was supposed to have...
If an acetate buffer solution was prepared using method 1 and it was supposed to have a pH of 4.7 but it actually came out to 4.9, what could be done to adjust the pH back down to 4.7 without completely remaking the solution and without altering the total amount of conjugate particles (HA + A‐)? Method 1 Measure out 15.0 mL of 0.10 M HC2H3O2 and 15.0 mL of 0.10 M NaC2H3O2. Measure and record the pH of the...
A solution contains 1.12×10-2 M copper(II) nitrate and 9.22×10-3 M nickel(II) acetate. Solid potassium hydroxide is...
A solution contains 1.12×10-2 M copper(II) nitrate and 9.22×10-3 M nickel(II) acetate. Solid potassium hydroxide is added slowly to this mixture. What is the concentration of copper(II) ion when nickel ion begins to precipitate? [Cu2+] =
Shown below is an income statement for 2017 that was prepared by a junior accountant at...
Shown below is an income statement for 2017 that was prepared by a junior accountant at Junior Corporation. Junior Corporation Income Statement December 31, 2017        Sales revenue..........................................................................................................       $975,000        Investment revenue...................................................................................................           19,500        Cost of merchandise sold..........................................................................................       (408,500)        Selling expenses......................................................................................................       (155,000)        Administrative expense.............................................................................................       (215,000)        Interest expense.......................................................................................................        (13,000)        Income before special items.......................................................................................         203,000        Special items               Loss on disposal of a segment of the business........................................................         (30,000)              ...
Below are shown three Lineweaver-Burk plots for enzyme reactions that have been carried out in the presence, or absence, of an inhibitor.
Below are shown three Lineweaver-Burk plots for enzyme reactions that have been carried out in the presence, or absence, of an inhibitor. Part A Indicate what type of inhibition is predicted based on Lineweaver-Burk plot.   mixed inhibition   competitive inhibition   uncompetitive inhibition   Part B Indicate which line corresponds to the reaction without inhibitor and which line corresponds to the reaction with inhibitor present.   red - without inhibitor, blue - with inhibitor   blue - without inhibitor, red - with inhibitor   Part C...
An acetic acid/ sodium acetate buffer solution was prepared using the following components: 3.46 g of...
An acetic acid/ sodium acetate buffer solution was prepared using the following components: 3.46 g of NaC2H3O2∙3H2O (FW. 136 g/mol) 9.0 mL of 3.0 M HC2H3O2 55.0 mL of water -What is the total volume of the solution? -Calculate the concentration of the [C2H3O2-] in this solution. -Calculate the concentration of the [HC2H3O2] in this solution. -Calculate the pH of this buffer solution. The Ka for acetic acid is 1.8x10-5. -If you take half of this solution and add 2...
A solution contains 1.44×10-2 M silver acetate and 6.44×10-3 M copper(II) nitrate. Solid potassium sulfide is...
A solution contains 1.44×10-2 M silver acetate and 6.44×10-3 M copper(II) nitrate. Solid potassium sulfide is added slowly to this mixture. A. What is the formula of the substance that precipitates first? formula = B. What is the concentration of sulfide ion when this precipitation first begins? [sulfide] = M
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT