Question

What—if anything—is wrong with taking off your clothes to earn some money?

Is there an ethical difference between stripping for Playboyor Playgirl magazine and Reed’s disrobing? If so, what is it? If not, why are they ethically the same? Use the concepts of prurience and objectification to answer.

Your boss wants to sleep with you, and it’s clear that visiting a hotel will help your career. What are two arguments against? What’s an argument in favor?

Answer 1

1. There is no wrong in taking off your clothes and earning money. In west and man European countries many college going girls do this thing to earn fast money to live a lavish life, or for their university fees. Apart from this, we can spot many girls selling their virginity online just because they want to support their families, or they want to study or they want to live an extraordinary life. This has become quite common at this time.

• Both the work seems to be same, in stripping you take your clothes off for the entertainment of the client and in Playgirl magazine you pose nude for the entertainment for the customers who buy the magazines. Both are ethically right.
• Both the work is done for the money, and ethically this is right. To survive in the world, the stripper is doing her job and same thing the model is doing. And both of them are doing because they seem to be happy with their job.
• If your boss is asking you for a sexual favour to promote you and he calls you in the hotel.

Against: you are a talented girl and if you don’t need a promotion and you think you can survive without promotion than please avoid all this.

You know you have the talent and can get another job if you leave the current job than do it and don’t compromise with your boss.

Favour: Ethically it is totally wrong, but if you think it is benefiting your career than please try to avoid it and don’t try this , also convince your boss not to push his luck to far. I would not support this.