Question

In: Operations Management

Blaze Manufacturing Company is using a weighted criteria evaluation system to certify suppliers.  Oronto Enterprise, Mintco Company...

Blaze Manufacturing Company is using a weighted criteria evaluation system to certify suppliers.  Oronto Enterprise, Mintco Company and Vertona Ltd. supply Blaze with components for their manufacturing process. Blaze Mfg. has scored Oronto, Mintco and Vertona on a scale of 0 to 100 (see table below).

Performance Criteria    Weight Oronto
(Score 0-100)   
Mintco
(Score 0-100)   
Vertona
(Score 0-100)
Technology 25% 85 80 60
Quality 20% 90 92 72
Environmental Responsibility    15% 84 85 70
Price 15% 77 80 65
On-time deliveries 10% 86 83 80
Flexibility 5% 84 85 90
Customer Service 10% 83 83 70

a) Based on the weights used in the evaluation system, what is Blaze Manufacturing’s purchasing objective?  [2 points]

b) If Blaze Mfg. classifies their vendors based on the following criteria:

i. Unacceptable (score less than 50)

ii. Conditional (score between 50 and 70)

iii. Certified (score between 70 and 90) and

iv. Preferred (score greater than 90)

how well are their suppliers Oronto, Mintco and Vertona doing?  Show all calculations. [4 points]

A.

a)  The company's purchasing objective is to place the highest value on technology and quality.

b)  Oronto classified as Certified, with a score of 84.00,
  Mintco classified as Certified, with a score of 74.00 and
  Vertona classified as Conditional, with a score of 65.25

B.

a)  The company's purchasing objective is to place the highest value on technology and quality.

b)  Oronto classified as Certified, with a score of 84.50,
  Mintco classified as Certified, with a score of 84.00 and
  Vertona classified as Conditional, with a score of 69.15

C.

a)  The company's purchasing objective is to place the highest value on flexibility.

b)  Oronto classified as Certified, with a score of 84.50,
  Mintco classified as Certified, with a score of 84.00 and
  Vertona classified as Conditional, with a score of 69.15

D.

a)  The company's purchasing objective is to place the highest value on flexibility.

b)  Oronto classified as Certified, with a score of 80.50,
  Mintco classified as Certified, with a score of 81.25 and
  Vertona classified as Conditional, with a score of 68.75

Solutions

Expert Solution

Correct Option is Option B

The company's objective to identify suppliers who have high score in Technology and Quality. The weights assigned denotes the same. Technology has 25% weightage whereas Quality has 20%. which are the highest weightages among all the parameters. Higher the weightage in decison making, higher the priority.

Refer the calculation below

Weight Oronto Score Oronto Weighted Score (Weight * Score) Mintco Score Mintco Weighted Score (Weight * Score) Vertona Score Vertona Weighted Score (Weight * Score)
Technology 25% 85 21.25 80 20 60 15
Quality 20% 90 18 92 18.4 72 14.4
Environmental Responsibility 15% 84 12.6 85 12.75 70 10.5
Price 15% 77 11.55 80 12 65 9.75
On-time deliveries 10% 86 8.6 83 8.3 80 8
Flexibility 5% 84 4.2 85 4.25 90 4.5
Customer Service 10% 83 8.3 83 8.3 70 7
Overall Weighted Score (Sum of weighted Score Column) 84.5 84 69.15

Oronto and Mintco has score between 70 and 90 (84.5 and 84). Hence are classified as Certified

Vertona has a score of 69.15, hence classified under the Conditional


Related Solutions

A large manufacturing company investigated the service it received from suppliers and discovered that, in the...
A large manufacturing company investigated the service it received from suppliers and discovered that, in the past, 35% of all materials shipments were received late. However, the company recently installed a just-in- time system in which suppliers are linked more closely to the manufacturing process. A random sample of 125 deliveries since the just-in- time system was installed reveals that 25 deliveries were late. Use this sample information to test whether the proportion of late deliveries was reduced significantly. Let...
Research and define appropriate frameworks with accompanying screening and evaluation criteria for selecting sourcing solutions, manufacturing locations, and 3PL providers.
Research and define appropriate frameworks with accompanying screening and evaluation criteria for selecting sourcing solutions, manufacturing locations, and 3PL providers. Each framework with accompanying evaluation criteria should be one to two pages in length and include cost, profitability, operational constraints, and other factors like political, economic, labor, environmental, and sustainability considerations. Any insight into this task would be great help.
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity,...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $12 $14 $10 2 $14 $12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity,...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $10 $14 $10 2 $16 $12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity,...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $12 $14 $10 2 $14 $12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity,...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $12 $12 $11 2 $10 $12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity,...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $12 $13 $10 2 $15 $12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
A Company has set up a weighted scoring matrix for evaluation of a three potential projects....
A Company has set up a weighted scoring matrix for evaluation of a three potential projects. Below are the weighted project scores of the three projects : Project A : The weighted project scores = 115 Project B : The weighted project scores = 99 Project C : The weighted project scores = 75 Using the weighted project scores, which project should be the company first priority?
The Journey Company operates under a process cost system using the weighted average method. All direct...
The Journey Company operates under a process cost system using the weighted average method. All direct materials are added at the beginning of production in the department, and conversion costs are incurred evenly throughout production. Inspection occurs when production is 100% completed. Following are data for January. All unfinished work at the end of January is 30% completed. The beginning inventory is 80% completed. Beginning inventories Direct Materials $16,000 Conversion Costs 14,200 Costs added during current period Direct Materials $90,400...
Problem 4-11 (Algorithmic) Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers...
Problem 4-11 (Algorithmic) Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $12 $13 $10 2 $15 $12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However,...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT