In: Civil Engineering
a) Racial formation is the process through which the meaning of
race and racial categories are agreed upon and argued over. It
results from the interplay between social structure and everyday
life.
The concept comes from racial formation theory, a sociological
theory that focuses on the connections between how race shapes and
is shaped by social structure, and how racial categories are
represented and given meaning in imagery, media, language, ideas,
and everyday common sense.
Racial formation theory frames the meaning of race as rooted in
context and history, and thus as something that changes over
time.
Omi and Winant's Theory:-
In their book Racial Formation in the United States , sociologists
Michael Omi and Howard Winant define racial formation as
“...the sociohistorical process by which racial categories are
created, inhabited, transformed, and destroyed.”
They explain that this process is accomplished by “historically
situated
projects in which human bodies and social structures are
represented and organized.”
“Projects,” here, refers to a representation of race that situates
it in social structure.
A racial project can take the form of common-sense assumptions
about racial groups, about whether race is significant in today’s
society, or narratives and images that depict race and racial
categories through mass media, for example.
These situate race within social structure by, for instance,
justifying
why some people have less wealth or make more money than others on
the basis of race, or, by pointing out that racism is alive and
well, and that it impacts people’s experiences in society.
Thus, Omi and Winant see the process of racial formation as
directly and deeply connected to how “society is organized and
ruled.” In this sense, race and the process of racial formation
have important political and economic implications.
Composed of Racial Projects:-
Central to their theory is the fact that race is used to signify
differences among people, via racial projects, and that how these
differences are signified connects to the organization of
society.
In the context of U.S. society, the concept of race is used to
signify physical differences among people but is also used to
signify actual and perceived cultural, economic, and behavioral
differences. By framing racial formation this way, Omi and Winant
illustrate that because the way we understand, describe, and
represent race is connected to how society is organized, then even
our common-sense understandings of race can have real and
significant political and economic consequences for things like
access to rights and resources.
Their theory frames the relationship between racial projects and
social structure as dialectical, meaning that the relationship
between the two goes in both directions, and that change in one
necessarily causes change in the other. So the outcomes of a
racialized social structure—differentials in wealth, income, and
assets on the basis of race, for example—shape what we believe to
be true about racial categories.
We then use race as a sort of shorthand to provide a set of
assumptions about a person, which in turn shapes our expectations
for a person’s behavior, beliefs, worldviews,
and even intelligence. The ideas we develop about race then act
back on the social structure in various political and economic
ways.
While some racial projects might be benign, progressive, or
anti-racist, many are racist. Racial projects which
represent certain racial groups as less than or deviant impact the
structure of society by excluding some from employment
opportunities, political office, educational opportunities,
and
subject some to police harassment and higher rates of arrest,
conviction, and incarceration.
bc