Question

In: Psychology

1.       Explain and evaluate the views of Anaximander regarding the nature ofsubstance.

1.       Explain and evaluate the views of Anaximander regarding the nature ofsubstance.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Anaximander wanted to find the principal substance of reality, and he came to the conclusion of it being air. Air is needed by all for continued existence, but Anaximander says objects are composed of air. Air is abundant, ever-flowing and profuse, so that is why life hasn’t stopped. If there was no air, the earth would be dead along with everyone on it.

For Anaximander, the principle of things, the ingredient of all substances, is nothing determined and not an element such as water in Thales' view. Neither is it something halfway between air and water, or between air and fire, thicker than air and fire, or more subtle than water and earth. Anaximander argues that water cannot embrace all of the opposites found in nature — for example, water can only be wet, never dry — and therefore cannot be the one primary substance; nor could any of the other candidates. He postulated the apeiron as a substance that, although not directly perceptible to us, could explain the opposites he saw around him.

Anaximander explains how the four elements of ancient physics (air, earth, water and fire) are formed, and how Earth and terrestrial beings are formed through their interactions. Unlike other Pre-Socratics, he never defines this principle precisely, and it has generally been understood (e.g., by Aristotle and by Saint Augustine) as a sort of primal chaos. According to him, the Universe originates in the partition of opposites in the elemental matter. It embraces the opposites of hot and cold, wet and dry, and directs the movement of things; an entire host of shapes and differences then grow that are found in "all the worlds" (for he believed there were many).

Anaximander maintains that all dying things are returning to the element from which they came (apeiron). The one surviving fragment of Anaximander's writing deals with this matter. Simplicius transmitted it as a quotation, which describes the balanced and mutual changes of the elements and is as under:

Whence things have their origin,
Thence also their destruction happens,
According to necessity;
For they give to each other justice and reward
For their injustice
In agreement with the ordinance of Time.


Related Solutions

1.       Evaluate the 4 views as to the nature of universals and particulars.
1.       Evaluate the 4 views as to the nature of universals and particulars.
Discussion on the Nature of Industry In this discussion, please share your views on the nature...
Discussion on the Nature of Industry In this discussion, please share your views on the nature of industry (it can be any industry for Example: fast food) in which your current employer belongs. While describing the industry you may like to use the tools we are learning in Modules 5-7.
1. Contrast and compare Adam Smith’s and the mercantilist’s views on the nature and causes of...
1. Contrast and compare Adam Smith’s and the mercantilist’s views on the nature and causes of the wealth of nation, and on the role of government?
Explain how Years views nature in “The Lake Isle of Innisfree.” by William Butler Yeats in...
Explain how Years views nature in “The Lake Isle of Innisfree.” by William Butler Yeats in 250 words.
Briefly give the views regarding the reasons for conserving biodiversity.
Briefly give the views regarding the reasons for conserving biodiversity.
Briefly give the views regarding the reasons for conserving biodiversity.
Briefly give the views regarding the reasons for conserving biodiversity.
. Contrast the views of Locke, Marx, Smith, Keynes, and Spencer on the nature and proper...
. Contrast the views of Locke, Marx, Smith, Keynes, and Spencer on the nature and proper functions of government and on its relationship to business. Which views seem to you to provide the most adequate analysis of contemporary relations between business and government? Explain your answer fully.
Critically evaluate Seniors views on the proper method for economics.
Critically evaluate Seniors views on the proper method for economics.
Discuss how Classical Economists views and Keynesians’ views conflict each other regarding Say’s Law, flexibility of...
Discuss how Classical Economists views and Keynesians’ views conflict each other regarding Say’s Law, flexibility of wages and prices, existence of self-regulation and the requirement of government intervention.
How do Hobbes' and Locke's views of life in the state of nature differ? What implications...
How do Hobbes' and Locke's views of life in the state of nature differ? What implications do these differences have for each theorist’s proposal to exit the state of nature and establish a society (e.g. the social contract, the sovereign, government etc.)? Which theorist do you find more compelling?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT