use truth tables to determine whether or not the following arguments are valid: a) if jones...

use truth tables to determine whether or not the following arguments are valid:

a) if jones is convicted then he will go to prison. Jones will be convicted only if Smith testifies against him. Therefore , Jones won't go to prison unless smith testifies against him.

b) either the Democrats or the Republicans will have a majority in the Senate. but not both. Having a Democratic majority is a necessary condition for the bill to pass. Therefore, if the republicans have a majority in the senate there the bill won't pass.

Solutions

Expert Solution

Plz feel free to comment in case of doubts as i am happy to help you. Plz upvote the solution if u r satisfied. It means a lot to me. Thanks

Colby Messinger answered 1 year ago

Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

a) Use truth tables to show that the following are valid arguments: i. [p  (p...

a) Use truth tables to show that the following are valid arguments: i. [p  (p → q)] → q ii. [(p → q) ∧ (q → r)] → (p → r) b) Use truth tables to show the logical equivalence of: i. (p → q) ⇔ (￢p ∨ q ) ii. (￢p ∨ q) ∨ (￢p  q) ⇔ p

Please use any of the methods to prove whether each of the following arguments is valid...

Please use any of the methods to prove whether each of the following arguments is valid or invalid. For each problem, please identify the method that you have decided to employ and make sure to show your work. 1. It is obvious that nuclear energy is needed. Nuclear energy is needed if and only if solar energy cannot be harnessed. And it is also true both that solar energy can be harnessed only if funds to do so are available,...

Determine each of the following arguments’ forms to be valid or invalid. You may use the...

Determine each of the following arguments’ forms to be valid or invalid. You may use the Venn Diagram proof method, the rules/fallacies method, or any other method, of your choice. 1. Some athletes are not baseball players and some baseball players are not basketball players. Therefore, some athletes are not basketball players.2. All creationists are fundamentalists because all fundamentalists are religious people and all creationists are religious people. 3. As no conservationists are litterers, no environmentalists are litterers, because all...

Using a truth table determine whether the argument form is valid or invalid p ∧ q...

Using a truth table determine whether the argument form is valid or invalid p ∧ q →∼ r p∨∼q ∼q→p ∴∼ r

Create two arguments, one valid and one invalid. Demonstrate with a truth table the validity of...

Create two arguments, one valid and one invalid. Demonstrate with a truth table the validity of each

create two arguments, one valid and one invalid. Demonstrate with a truth table the validity of...

create two arguments, one valid and one invalid. Demonstrate with a truth table the validity of each.

Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency - Practice Arguments 2 Determine whether each of the following arguments is...

Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency - Practice Arguments 2 Determine whether each of the following arguments is a deductive argument or an inductive argument. If the argument is a deductive argument, then evaluate the argument for its validity and soundness. If the argument is an inductive argument, then evaluate the argument for its strength and cogency. Use the selection lists beneath each argument to indicate your answers. Argument A An aardvark is (deductive/inductive) , (valid/invalid/strong/weak) , and (sound/unsound/cogent/uncogent) . Argument B...

Use the truth-tree decision procedure (relying on Proof Tools or pen/pencil and paper) to determine whether...

Use the truth-tree decision procedure (relying on Proof Tools or pen/pencil and paper) to determine whether P→Q,Q⊨P is deductively valid.

Determine whether the following categorical syllogisms are valid or invalid. Categorical syllogism 1 No M are...

Determine whether the following categorical syllogisms are valid or invalid. Categorical syllogism 1 No M are P. No M are S No S are P. Categorical syllogism 2 Some M are not P. Some M are S. Some S are not P. Categorical syllogism 3 Some M are not P. Some M are not S. Some S are P. Categorical syllogism 4 All M are P. All S are M. All S are P. Categorical syllogism 6 No M are...

Exercise 1.13.5: Determine and prove whether an argument in English is valid or invalid. Prove whether...

Exercise 1.13.5: Determine and prove whether an argument in English is valid or invalid. Prove whether each argument is valid or invalid. First find the form of the argument by defining predicates and expressing the hypotheses and the conclusion using the predicates. If the argument is valid, then use the rules of inference to prove that the form is valid. If the argument is invalid, give values for the predicates you defined for a small domain that demonstrate the argument...

Subjects