Please use any of the methods to prove whether each of the following arguments is valid...

Please use any of the methods to prove whether each of the following arguments is valid or invalid. For each problem, please identify the method that you have decided to employ and make sure to show your work.

1. It is obvious that nuclear energy is needed. Nuclear energy is needed if and only if solar energy cannot be harnessed. And it is also true both that solar energy can be harnessed only if funds to do so are available, and that funds are not available.

Expert Solution

genius_generous answered 1 year ago

use truth tables to determine whether or not the following arguments are valid: a) if jones...

use truth tables to determine whether or not the following arguments are valid: a) if jones is convicted then he will go to prison. Jones will be convicted only if Smith testifies against him. Therefore , Jones won't go to prison unless smith testifies against him. b) either the Democrats or the Republicans will have a majority in the Senate. but not both. Having a Democratic majority is a necessary condition for the bill to pass. Therefore, if the republicans...

Question-Directions-Translate each of the following arguments into quantified form and prove that each is valid using...

Question-Directions-Translate each of the following arguments into quantified form and prove that each is valid using natural deduction. If all store supervisors are wise, then some employees benefit. If there are some store supervisors who are not wise, then some employees benefit. As you can see, either way, some employees benefit. (S, W, E, B)

Determine each of the following arguments’ forms to be valid or invalid. You may use the...

Determine each of the following arguments’ forms to be valid or invalid. You may use the Venn Diagram proof method, the rules/fallacies method, or any other method, of your choice. 1. Some athletes are not baseball players and some baseball players are not basketball players. Therefore, some athletes are not basketball players.2. All creationists are fundamentalists because all fundamentalists are religious people and all creationists are religious people. 3. As no conservationists are litterers, no environmentalists are litterers, because all...

2. Determine whether the following Propositional Logic statements are valid or invalid arguments. You may use...

2. Determine whether the following Propositional Logic statements are valid or invalid arguments. You may use a truth table, proofs using rules of inference, or resolution (specify which method you are using). (a) p→q, ~q→r, r; ∴p (b) ~p∨q, p→(r∧s), s→q; ∴q∨r (c) p→(q→r), q; ∴p→r

Exercise 1.13.5: Determine and prove whether an argument in English is valid or invalid. Prove whether...

Exercise 1.13.5: Determine and prove whether an argument in English is valid or invalid. Prove whether each argument is valid or invalid. First find the form of the argument by defining predicates and expressing the hypotheses and the conclusion using the predicates. If the argument is valid, then use the rules of inference to prove that the form is valid. If the argument is invalid, give values for the predicates you defined for a small domain that demonstrate the argument...

Determine whether the following arguments are valid. Explain your answer. If it is hot outside, I...

Determine whether the following arguments are valid. Explain your answer. If it is hot outside, I will not go to play. If I play, I will not study. If I study, I will do good in the exam. I did good in the exam. Therefore, it is hot outside. If I can run faster than air plane or I can kill a lion then I am a super human. If I am a super human then I am very careful...

a) Use truth tables to show that the following are valid arguments: i. [p  (p...

a) Use truth tables to show that the following are valid arguments: i. [p  (p → q)] → q ii. [(p → q) ∧ (q → r)] → (p → r) b) Use truth tables to show the logical equivalence of: i. (p → q) ⇔ (￢p ∨ q ) ii. (￢p ∨ q) ∨ (￢p  q) ⇔ p

Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency - Practice Arguments 2 Determine whether each of the following arguments is...

Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency - Practice Arguments 2 Determine whether each of the following arguments is a deductive argument or an inductive argument. If the argument is a deductive argument, then evaluate the argument for its validity and soundness. If the argument is an inductive argument, then evaluate the argument for its strength and cogency. Use the selection lists beneath each argument to indicate your answers. Argument A An aardvark is (deductive/inductive) , (valid/invalid/strong/weak) , and (sound/unsound/cogent/uncogent) . Argument B...

Please justify and prove each statement (Use explicitly the four axioms) a) Prove that a finite...

Please justify and prove each statement (Use explicitly the four axioms) a) Prove that a finite positive linear combination of metrics is a metric (Use explicitly the four axioms). If it is infinite, will it be metric? b) Is the difference between two metrics a metric? (d1 - d2)

QUESTION 5 Decide in each of the following instances whether the contract is valid, void or...

QUESTION 5 Decide in each of the following instances whether the contract is valid, void or voidable. Motivate your answers. 5.1 Grace orders an oval-shaped swimming pool to be delivered, but the pool company delivers a square-shaped pool. (2) 5.2 Rob phones Lindsay’s home number and makes her a job offer. The next morning Lindsay’s sister, Janine, comes to work for him. Rob discovers that the offer was made to the wrong person. (2) 5.3 A traditional healer tells his...

Question