a) Use truth tables to show that the following are valid arguments: i. [p  (p...

a) Use truth tables to show that the following are valid arguments:

i. [p  (p → q)] → q

ii. [(p → q) ∧ (q → r)] → (p → r)

b) Use truth tables to show the logical equivalence of:

i. (p → q) ⇔ (￢p ∨ q )

ii. (￢p ∨ q) ∨ (￢p  q) ⇔ p

Expert Solution

Colby Messinger answered 1 year ago

use truth tables to determine whether or not the following arguments are valid: a) if jones...

use truth tables to determine whether or not the following arguments are valid: a) if jones is convicted then he will go to prison. Jones will be convicted only if Smith testifies against him. Therefore , Jones won't go to prison unless smith testifies against him. b) either the Democrats or the Republicans will have a majority in the Senate. but not both. Having a Democratic majority is a necessary condition for the bill to pass. Therefore, if the republicans...

A. Use truth tables to verify these equivalences 1. p∨p ≡ p 2. p∧p ≡ p...

A. Use truth tables to verify these equivalences 1. p∨p ≡ p 2. p∧p ≡ p 3. p∨(p∧q) ≡ p 4. p∨q ≡¬p → q 5. p∧q ≡¬(p →¬q) 6. p ↔ q ≡ (p → q)∧(q → p) B. Determine the truth value of each of these statements. (Assume the domain of variables consist of all real numbers). 1. ∃x(x2 = 2) 2. ∃x(x + 2 = x) 3. ∀x(x2 + 2 > 0) 4. ∀x(x2 = x)

Create two arguments, one valid and one invalid. Demonstrate with a truth table the validity of...

Create two arguments, one valid and one invalid. Demonstrate with a truth table the validity of each

create two arguments, one valid and one invalid. Demonstrate with a truth table the validity of...

create two arguments, one valid and one invalid. Demonstrate with a truth table the validity of each.

Create truth tables for the following expressions. Include all necessary negations and sub-expressions. ( p ∧...

Create truth tables for the following expressions. Include all necessary negations and sub-expressions. ( p ∧ q ) ∨ ( ¬ r ) ¬ ( p ∨ q ) ∧ ( r ⊕ s ) [ ( q ⊕ r ) ∧ s ] ⟶ p If you could explain the thought process behind how you did these that would be amazing, I am trying to learn the reasoning as I practice. Thanks

Determine each of the following arguments’ forms to be valid or invalid. You may use the...

Determine each of the following arguments’ forms to be valid or invalid. You may use the Venn Diagram proof method, the rules/fallacies method, or any other method, of your choice. 1. Some athletes are not baseball players and some baseball players are not basketball players. Therefore, some athletes are not basketball players.2. All creationists are fundamentalists because all fundamentalists are religious people and all creationists are religious people. 3. As no conservationists are litterers, no environmentalists are litterers, because all...

Please use any of the methods to prove whether each of the following arguments is valid...

Please use any of the methods to prove whether each of the following arguments is valid or invalid. For each problem, please identify the method that you have decided to employ and make sure to show your work. 1. It is obvious that nuclear energy is needed. Nuclear energy is needed if and only if solar energy cannot be harnessed. And it is also true both that solar energy can be harnessed only if funds to do so are available,...

Using a truth table determine whether the argument form is valid or invalid p ∧ q...

Using a truth table determine whether the argument form is valid or invalid p ∧ q →∼ r p∨∼q ∼q→p ∴∼ r

Determine whether the following arguments are valid. Explain your answer. If it is hot outside, I...

Determine whether the following arguments are valid. Explain your answer. If it is hot outside, I will not go to play. If I play, I will not study. If I study, I will do good in the exam. I did good in the exam. Therefore, it is hot outside. If I can run faster than air plane or I can kill a lion then I am a super human. If I am a super human then I am very careful...

2. Determine whether the following Propositional Logic statements are valid or invalid arguments. You may use...

2. Determine whether the following Propositional Logic statements are valid or invalid arguments. You may use a truth table, proofs using rules of inference, or resolution (specify which method you are using). (a) p→q, ~q→r, r; ∴p (b) ~p∨q, p→(r∧s), s→q; ∴q∨r (c) p→(q→r), q; ∴p→r

Question