Question

Francis Fukuyama argues that "history has ended." Samuel Huntington warns of an imminent "clash of civilizations." Who is correct? What do the histories of Germany and Iran suggest about which argument may be correct?

Answer 1

Francis Fukuyama argued that "History has ended". This argument includes both the concepts of philosophy and politics. It meant that an economic, social or political will evolve and the last form of han government will be constituted with this system.

Samuel huntington argued that "clash of civilizations". It states that in the coming world wars, the most important source for the conflict will be due to the cultural and religious beliefs or identities among the people. That is he clearly mentioned that the upcoming wars will be only based upon cultures and not between any countries.

But at present, it is easier to imagine the end of the world, but it is not possible to imagine the endo of capitalism. In this aspect, fukuyama's argument is true and remains valid. Now all the countries are moving towards the state of democracy.

But there are many challenges like ISIS and other religious fundamentalism in many regions of the world. While considering this, samuel's argument is also true.

So we can conclude that each of their argument has its own trueness in the world.

Thanks!...