In: Economics
Explain clash of civilization by samuel p huntington in terms of international relations also the conflicts and differnces in languages cultural traditions etc.
also explain the civilization consciousness. what are the fault lines between the civilizations? explain The kin-country syndrome. and the west versus the rest
Ans.
- The Clash of Civilizations is a proposition that individuals social and strict personalities will be the essential wellspring of contention in the post-Cold War world.
- The American political researcher Samuel P. Huntington contended that future wars would be battled not between nations, however between societies and different cultural diversities.
- Huntington offers some clarifications for why civilizations will clash:
o Contrasts among civilizations are excessively essential in that civilizations are separated from one another by history, language, culture, custom, and, above all, religion.
o These crucial contrasts are the result of hundreds of years and the establishments of various civilizations, which means they won't be gone soon.
o The world is turning into a small spot. Subsequently, collaborations over the world are expanding, which increase the attention to contrasts among civilizations and shared characteristics inside civilizations.
o Because of financial modernization and social change, individuals are isolated from longstanding neighborhood personalities. Rather, religion has supplanted this hole, which gives a premise to character and duty that rises above national limits and joins civilizations.
- With respect to west vs the rest he explained that the development of human progress awareness is upgraded by the double job of the West. From one viewpoint, the West is at a pinnacle of intensity. Simultaneously, an arrival to-the-roots wonder is happening among non-Western civilizations. A West at the pinnacle of its capacity goes up against non-Western nations that undeniably have the craving, the will and the assets to shape the world in non-Western ways.
- Non-Western nations can endeavor to accomplish detachment so as to save their own qualities and shield themselves from Western intrusion. He contended that the expenses of this activity are high and just a couple of states can seek after it.
- As per the hypothesis of "band-wagoning" non-Western nations can join and acknowledge Western qualities.
- Social qualities and contrasts are less alterable and henceforth less effortlessly undermined and settled than political and monetary ones.