Question

In: Economics

Explain clash of civilization by samuel p huntington in terms of international relations also the conflicts...

Explain clash of civilization by samuel p huntington in terms of international relations also the conflicts and differnces in languages cultural traditions etc.

also explain the civilization consciousness. what are the fault lines between the civilizations? explain The kin-country syndrome. and the west versus the rest

Solutions

Expert Solution

Ans.

- The Clash of Civilizations is a proposition that individuals social and strict personalities will be the essential wellspring of contention in the post-Cold War world.

- The American political researcher Samuel P. Huntington contended that future wars would be battled not between nations, however between societies and different cultural diversities.

- Huntington offers some clarifications for why civilizations will clash:

o Contrasts among civilizations are excessively essential in that civilizations are separated from one another by history, language, culture, custom, and, above all, religion.

o These crucial contrasts are the result of hundreds of years and the establishments of various civilizations, which means they won't be gone soon.

o The world is turning into a small spot. Subsequently, collaborations over the world are expanding, which increase the attention to contrasts among civilizations and shared characteristics inside civilizations.

o Because of financial modernization and social change, individuals are isolated from longstanding neighborhood personalities. Rather, religion has supplanted this hole, which gives a premise to character and duty that rises above national limits and joins civilizations.

- With respect to west vs the rest he explained that the development of human progress awareness is upgraded by the double job of the West. From one viewpoint, the West is at a pinnacle of intensity. Simultaneously, an arrival to-the-roots wonder is happening among non-Western civilizations. A West at the pinnacle of its capacity goes up against non-Western nations that undeniably have the craving, the will and the assets to shape the world in non-Western ways.

- Non-Western nations can endeavor to accomplish detachment so as to save their own qualities and shield themselves from Western intrusion. He contended that the expenses of this activity are high and just a couple of states can seek after it.

- As per the hypothesis of "band-wagoning" non-Western nations can join and acknowledge Western qualities.

- Social qualities and contrasts are less alterable and henceforth less effortlessly undermined and settled than political and monetary ones.


Related Solutions

Francis Fukuyama argues that "history has ended." Samuel Huntington warns of an imminent "clash of civilizations."...
Francis Fukuyama argues that "history has ended." Samuel Huntington warns of an imminent "clash of civilizations." Who is correct? What do the histories of Germany and Iran suggest about which argument may be correct?
Below are organizations that govern international relations. Compare two of them in terms of their objectives,...
Below are organizations that govern international relations. Compare two of them in terms of their objectives, roles, functions. Write your answers in a bullet form. 1. International Criminal court (ICC) 2. North Atlantic Organization (NATO) 3. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) 4. United nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) 5. Global Environment Facility (GEF) ?
How can prisoner’s dilemma be used to explain international relations?
How can prisoner’s dilemma be used to explain international relations?
Please explain what diplomatic bargaining may mean and provide an example in international relations.
Please explain what diplomatic bargaining may mean and provide an example in international relations.
international relations Course the definitions must both define the term and explain why it is significant...
international relations Course the definitions must both define the term and explain why it is significant for this course, i.e., why are we studying it in this course. So standard answers would include two sentences, with the first sentence defining the term and the second speaking to why it is significant. could some one help me with this please. 41. Intergovernmental organization (IGO) 42. International law 43. Bilateral treaty 44. Multilateral treaty 45. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 46. North...
international relations Course the definitions must both define the term and explain why it is significant...
international relations Course the definitions must both define the term and explain why it is significant for this course, i.e., why are we studying it in this course. So standard answers would include two sentences, with the first sentence defining the term and the second speaking to why it is significant. could some one help me with this please. 31. Classical liberalism 32. Supply-side economics 33. Demand-side economics 34. Keynesianism 35. Historical Utilitarianism 36. Pragmatism 37. Anti-egalitarianism 38. Human perfectibility...
international relations Course the definitions must both define the term and explain why it is significant...
international relations Course the definitions must both define the term and explain why it is significant for this course, i.e., why are we studying it in this course. So standard answers would include two sentences, with the first sentence defining the term and the second speaking to why it is significant. could some one help me with this please. 35. Historical Utilitarianism 36. Pragmatism 37. Anti-egalitarianism 38. Human perfectibility 39. Socialism 40. Marxism
international relations Course the definitions must both define the term and explain why it is significant...
international relations Course the definitions must both define the term and explain why it is significant for this course, i.e., why are we studying it in this course. So standard answers would include two sentences, with the first sentence defining the term and the second speaking to why it is significant. could some one help me with this please. 45. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 46. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) 47. The United Nations 48. The European Union...
1- Explain why there is no non-western international relations theory. ? 2- Discuss the basic assumptions...
1- Explain why there is no non-western international relations theory. ? 2- Discuss the basic assumptions of Classical Realism with reference to the Peloponnesian War. ?
Please explain what diplomatic bargaining may mean and provide an example in international relations demonstrating this...
Please explain what diplomatic bargaining may mean and provide an example in international relations demonstrating this negotiation process by doing some research or finding an article about diplomacy between two or more countries. In addition, please apply Hans Morgenthau’s 9 Rules of Diplomatic Strategy to your analysis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT