Question

2. Compare and contrast Cressey’s and Albrecht’s theories of crime causation.

3. Identify from Cressey’s research the six situational categories that cause nonshareable
problems.

5. Give examples of behavioral indications of fraud.

Answer 1

I am writing all three parts answers .

Part 2)

Compare and contrast Albrecht theories of crime causation are:

Albrecht's selections are like Cressey's therein the 2 of them concurred that cash connected weight and saw chance are elementary for the event of extortion. Cressey's third issue, however, targeted round the culprit's capability to make a case for unlawful conduct, whereas Albrecht probable that individual honesty would stop an individual from submitting deceit. Cressey primarily investigated the explanations why extortion was submitted, whereas Albrecht designed up a summation of "warnings" which will supply items of data to the likelihood of deceit and who may well be well on the way to submit different types of misrepresentation.

Part 3)

6 Cressey's exploration situational categories that cause nonshareable problems are following :

- Here the infringement of attributable commitments is the first one.

-Problems taking place thanks to individual disappointment is second.

-Business inversions is third.

-Physical seclusion is the fourth one.

-standing increasing is the fifth one.

-Boss employee relations is the sixth one

Part 5)

Example of behavioral indication of fraud are:

1) Living past ones ways

2. A impressive wish for individual addition

3. High near to home obligation

4. Feeling pay wasn't proportionate with obligation

5. A wheeler-vendor trait

6. Solid check to beat the framework and Over the highest indulgent .

Thanks

Hope you will appreciate