In: Accounting
Crossland Construction’s design/build department allows their
clients (owners) to select the design and construction team based
on their combined experience and track-record. Design/build firms
typically have a cash flow problem since they tend to be paid in
lump sums when projects are completed or hit milestones. However,
their expenses, such as payroll, must be paid regularly. So, such
firms need bank lines of credit to finance their initial costs, but
in the past year, lines of credit were difficult to negotiate. The
data file Crossland Construction contains month-end cash balances
for the past 16 months.
a) Plot the data as a time-series graph. Fit a linear line to the
data. Discuss what the graph implies concerning the relationship
between cash balance and the time variable, month.
b) Fit a linear trend model to the data. Compute the coefficient of
determination. Discuss the appropriateness of the linear trend
model. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the model?
c) Referring to part b), compute the MAD and MSE for the 16 data
points.
d) Plot the data as a time-series graph. Fit a polynomial line to
the data. Discuss what the graph implies concerning the
relationship between cash balance and the time variable,
month.
e) Use the t2 transformation approach and recompute the linear
model using the transformed time variable. Discuss whether this
model appears to provide a better fit than did the model without
the transformation. Compare the coefficients of determination for
the two models. Which model seems to be superior, using the
coefficient of determination as the criterion?
f) Referring to part e), compute the MAD and MSE for the 16 data
values. Discuss how these compare to those that were computed in
part c), prior to transformation. Do the measures of fit (R2, MSE,
MAD) agree on the best model to use for forecasting purposes?
g) Use the linear trend model (without transformation) for the
first 15 months and provide a cash balance forecast for month 16.
Then use the transformation model for the first 15 months and
provide a cash balance forecast for month 16. Now, compare the
accuracy of the forecasts with and without the transformation.
Which of the two forecast models would you prefer? Explain your
answer.
Month | Cash Balance |
1 | 75 |
2 | 70 |
3 | 77 |
4 | 89 |
5 | 80 |
6 | 92 |
7 | 91 |
8 | 102 |
9 | 106 |
10 | 130 |
11 | 155 |
12 | 160 |
13 | 180 |
14 | 199 |
15 | 240 |
16 | 305 |
Lets understand the Impact of Cash Balance through Moving Averages | |||||||||
Moving Averages- Basis 2 Years | |||||||||
Month | Cash Balance | ||||||||
1 | 75 | 72.5 | |||||||
2 | 70 | 73.5 | |||||||
3 | 77 | 83 | |||||||
4 | 89 | 84.5 | |||||||
5 | 80 | 86 | |||||||
6 | 92 | 91.5 | |||||||
7 | 91 | 96.5 | |||||||
8 | 102 | 104 | |||||||
9 | 106 | 118 | |||||||
10 | 130 | 142.5 | |||||||
11 | 155 | 157.5 | |||||||
12 | 160 | 170 | |||||||
13 | 180 | 189.5 | |||||||
14 | 199 | 219.5 | |||||||
15 | 240 | 272.5 | |||||||
16 | 305 | ||||||||
When We look at the cash Balance based on two years Average, there is consistent increase over 16 years | |||||||||
Based on the above, we can conclude that company will not suffer cash crunches | |||||||||
Now Lets calucalate Moving Averages- Basis 3 Years | |||||||||
Month | Cash Balance | ||||||||
1 | 75 | ||||||||
2 | 70 | 74 | |||||||
3 | 77 | 78.66667 | |||||||
4 | 89 | 82 | |||||||
5 | 80 | 87 | |||||||
6 | 92 | 87.66667 | |||||||
7 | 91 | 95 | |||||||
8 | 102 | 99.66667 | |||||||
9 | 106 | 112.6667 | |||||||
10 | 130 | 130.3333 | |||||||
11 | 155 | 148.3333 | |||||||
12 | 160 | 165 | |||||||
13 | 180 | 179.6667 | |||||||
14 | 199 | 206.3333 | |||||||
15 | 240 | 248 | |||||||
16 | 305 | ||||||||
When We look at the cash Balance based on three years average, there is again consistent increase over 16 years | |||||||||
From the above calculations, we can assume that the company will not suffer cash crunches for the years to come | |||||||||
Now Lets calucalate Moving Averages- Basis 4 Years | |||||||||
Month | Cash Balance | ||||||||
1 | 75 | ||||||||
2 | 70 | ||||||||
3 | 77 | 77.75 | |||||||
4 | 89 | 79 | |||||||
5 | 80 | 84.5 | |||||||
6 | 92 | 88 | |||||||
7 | 91 | 91.25 | |||||||
8 | 102 | 97.75 | |||||||
9 | 106 | 107.25 | |||||||
10 | 130 | 123.25 | |||||||
11 | 155 | 137.75 | |||||||
12 | 160 | 156.25 | |||||||
13 | 180 | 173.5 | |||||||
14 | 199 | 194.75 | |||||||
15 | 240 | 231 | |||||||
16 | 305 | ||||||||
When We look at the cash Balance based on four years average, there is again consistent increase over 16 years | |||||||||
From the above calculations, we can assume that the company will not suffer cash crunches for the years to come | |||||||||
Final Conclusion: The Companies Cash Balance will be adequate to render the services |