Question

In: Operations Management

Why do many employers who are not unionized require their employees to sign pre-employment arbitration clauses?

Why do many employers who are not unionized require their employees to sign pre-employment arbitration clauses?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Pre-employment Arbitration Clause

Current employment litigations impacting the employment environment where both the employer and employee are facing the problems. Employees are fighting for their rights and employers are doing their monopoly. Employees are dragging the employers to the court of law where the employers are losing a lot. So employers are always interested to sign the arbitration clause before the employment for taking away the rights of employees to sue the employers. Arbitrators are the neutral third party may be the retired judges or attorneys hired to hear both the sides of case to make decisions.

Why employer sign the clause

  1. The case solved by arbitrator is cost effective and less time consuming where court actions are very costly and time consuming. So employers find easy to hire the arbitrator instead of hiring one lawyer in court.
  2. Employers have believe that they fare better in arbitration because juries of court are more likely to be emotional to give the decision in favor of employees where the employer may lose huge money as compensation or settlement. But arbitrators are more likely to side with business and more likely set their emotions aside and look only at the facts.
  3. Case in the courts will reveal the privacy of employer and will defame the reputation where as in case of arbitration they value the privacy and decisions not made publicly.
  4. Employers believe that they stand to lose less often and less money in arbitration than they would in court.
  5. Employees cannot raise their voice to increase the wage, leave rules and working conditions once they have signed the arbitration clause in return providing sense of security to employers.
  6. Employers are always interested to minimize the risk related to employment with lesser amount of stress and quick manner which arbitration provides.

Related Solutions

1a. Compare and contrast the nature and conditions of employment between unionized and non-unionized employees in...
1a. Compare and contrast the nature and conditions of employment between unionized and non-unionized employees in the province of Ontario 1b. Describe the various ways in which unions can provide “voice” for their members and society. Provide examples
Terminating an employee under the employment-at-will doctrine: Protects employers who fire employees with cause. Protects employers...
Terminating an employee under the employment-at-will doctrine: Protects employers who fire employees with cause. Protects employers who fire employees without cause. Does not protect whistle-blowers. Both A and B above. 2- A personnel manual also known as an employee handbook: May be a contract in an employment-at-will relationship. Is an important management tool that helps define the employer and employee relationship. Can protect both the employer and employee by eliminating any issues related to the agreement between the employer and...
Explain why many organizations require arbitration instead of litigation. (300 words)
Explain why many organizations require arbitration instead of litigation. (300 words)
Why do employers provide health insurance coverage to their employees?
Why do employers provide health insurance coverage to their employees?
1. Currently, the Employment Insurance payroll tax in Canada is divided between employers and employees. Employers...
1. Currently, the Employment Insurance payroll tax in Canada is divided between employers and employees. Employers must pay the government a tax of 2.56% of the wages they pay, and employees must pay 1.83% of the wages they receive. In order to make workers better off (and increase their chances of re-election) the government is considering changing the system and replacing it with a 4.39% tax on employers alone, with employees paying nothing. Would this make employees better off? Explain.
What is the difference between binding arbitration and advisory arbitration? Why do some consider “advisory arbitration”...
What is the difference between binding arbitration and advisory arbitration? Why do some consider “advisory arbitration” to be a misnomer?
How do employers promote use of EAP's? Are employees reluctant to use EAP's? Why or why...
How do employers promote use of EAP's? Are employees reluctant to use EAP's? Why or why not?
Is the Emotional Intelligence of employees important for employers to know and understand? Why or why...
Is the Emotional Intelligence of employees important for employers to know and understand? Why or why not?
How do insurance plans offered by employers benefit employees even when employers do not pay any...
How do insurance plans offered by employers benefit employees even when employers do not pay any of the costs? A. Companies that do not contribute to insurance costs must offer special benefits instead. B. Employers, though they appear to have no costs, make some indirect legal contribution. C. Employees are offered insurance plans at lower rates through group programs. D. The amount paid by employees are tax-free only when employers make no contribution.
Explain the concept of employment-at-will. Tell why and how this right of employers is changing.
Explain the concept of employment-at-will. Tell why and how this right of employers is changing.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT