Question

In: Operations Management

Many employers are monitoring employees to see how many and what types of phone calls they...

Many employers are monitoring employees to see how many and what types of phone calls they are making. Some companies also monitor emails employees send and receive and websites they access. In your initial discussion post, respond to the following questions:

How might a company benefit from gathering this type of information?

Why might employees object to being monitored?

Do you think this type of monitoring is appropriate or inappropriate, from a security perspective? Explain your answer.

Solutions

Expert Solution

A company may be benefitted from this kind of monitoring in certain ways-

To analyze the employees working habits and to provide them their real productivity figure.

They can also be educated about their performance in feedback process.

It can provide a company about the employees behaviour and assist in restructuring the working schedule and design in effective manner.

It can also benefit the organization by preventing injury likely to cause by any employee's disloyalty.

Employee may object to being monitored because the personal life and privacy of the employee is likely to be  at risk. When an employee uses company held mobiles or telephone, and he uses it for personal communications too then his data can be misused.

Sometimes monitoring official mails and texts can reduce employee's confidence and he feels discomfort in working freely, as everyone has their own style of handling or negotiating any deal or business.

This kind of monitoring is somehow necessary for the organization and for the employees too to analyze their performance and to prevent any miscommunication etc. But excessive monitoring or monitoring beyond the memo given to them is unethical.

It can not be fully considered as appropriate or innappropriate. If done in controlled and ethical manner it is beneficial for organization as well as employees and ensures prevention of confidential data. But if it is unethically done it can breach privacy of the employee.


Related Solutions

A sample of 20 Ohio University students were randomly selected and asked, “How many phone calls...
A sample of 20 Ohio University students were randomly selected and asked, “How many phone calls did you receive last night?” The numbers below are their responses. 1  2  0  2  4  2  3  4  5  3 0  4  5  6  3  10  7  6  7  11 Compute the IQR of the distribution. Answers: a. 6 b. 3 c. 4 d. 2
A sample of 20 Ohio University students were randomly selected and asked, “How many phone calls...
A sample of 20 Ohio University students were randomly selected and asked, “How many phone calls did you receive last night?” The numbers below are their responses. 1  2  0  2  4  2  3  4  0 5  3  4  5  6  3  10  7  6  7  11 Compute the standard deviation of the distribution. Answers: a. 6.4 b. 2.51 c. 3.16 d. 2.97
How should the burden of health costs be shared by employers and employees? If employees have...
How should the burden of health costs be shared by employers and employees? If employees have to bear more of the cost, will they skimp on medically necessary care, curtail the use of less valuable services or both? Is the cost-sharing program instituted at Harvard, in effect, “a pay cut” designed to “come at …the moment you are sick…” Or is it intended as a behavior “designed to reduce overall spending.” Thinking more broadly, should our healthcare insurance be delivered...
How should the burden of health costs be shared by employers and employees? If employees have...
How should the burden of health costs be shared by employers and employees? If employees have to bear more of the cost, will they skimp on medically necessary care, curtail the use of less valuable services or both? Is the cost-sharing program instituted at Harvard, in effect, “a pay cut” designed to “come at …the moment you are sick…” Or is it intended as a behavior “designed to reduce overall spending.” Thinking more broadly, should our healthcare insurance be delivered...
Many employers offer their employees a choice of plans, paying a fixed share of the cost...
Many employers offer their employees a choice of plans, paying a fixed share of the cost of each. What inefficiencies does this introduce? Some employers, such as Stanford University, have instead offered a fixed payment, regardless of the plan chosen, and have insisted that all programs offer identical coverage. Within three years, the cost of providing this standard coverage fell by 20 percent in real terms. Explain why this may have happened
Discuss business reasons for employee monitoring. What types of monitoring are allowed?
Discuss business reasons for employee monitoring. What types of monitoring are allowed?
Affirmative action is both a legal and emotional issue affecting employees and employers. Develop as many...
Affirmative action is both a legal and emotional issue affecting employees and employers. Develop as many arguments as you can both supporting and opposing affirmative action as an employer policy. If you were asked to implement such a program, what steps would you follow?
Affirmative action is both a legal and emotional issue affecting employees and employers. Develop as many...
Affirmative action is both a legal and emotional issue affecting employees and employers. Develop as many arguments as you can both supporting and opposing affirmative action as an employer policy. If you were asked to implement such a program, what steps would you follow?
How do insurance plans offered by employers benefit employees even when employers do not pay any...
How do insurance plans offered by employers benefit employees even when employers do not pay any of the costs? A. Companies that do not contribute to insurance costs must offer special benefits instead. B. Employers, though they appear to have no costs, make some indirect legal contribution. C. Employees are offered insurance plans at lower rates through group programs. D. The amount paid by employees are tax-free only when employers make no contribution.
Why do many employers who are not unionized require their employees to sign pre-employment arbitration clauses?
Why do many employers who are not unionized require their employees to sign pre-employment arbitration clauses?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT