In: Finance
Seth Bullock, the owner of Bullock Gold Mining, is evaluating a new gold mine in South Dakota. Dan Dority, the company’s geologist, has just finished his analysis of the mine site. He has estimated that the mine would be productive for eight years, after which the gold would be completely mined. Dan has taken an estimate of the gold deposits to Alma Garrett, the company’s financial officer. Alma has been asked by Seth to perform an analysis of the new mine and present her recommendation on whether the company should open the new mine.
Alma has used the estimates provided by Dan to determine the revenues that could be expected from the mine. She has also projected the expense of opening the mine and the annual operating expenses. If the com- pany opens the mine, it will cost $850 million today, and it will have a cash outflow of $120 million nine years from today in costs associated with closing the mine and reclaiming the area surrounding it. The expected cash flows each year from the mine are shown in the table that follows. Bullock has a 12 percent required return on all of its gold mines.
YEAR |
CASH FLOW |
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
-$850,000,000 165,000,000 190,000,000 225,000,000 245,000,000 235,000,000 195,000,000 175,000,000 155,000,000 -120,000,000 |
1. Construct a spreadsheet to calculate the payback period, internal rate of return, modified internal rate
of return, and net present value of the proposed mine.
2. Based on your analysis, should the company open the mine?
1
1
Project | ||||||||||
Year | Cash flow stream | Cumulative cash flow | ||||||||
0 | -850000000 | -850000000 | ||||||||
1 | 165000000 | -685000000 | ||||||||
2 | 190000000 | -495000000 | ||||||||
3 | 225000000 | -270000000 | ||||||||
4 | 245000000 | -25000000 | ||||||||
5 | 235000000 | 210000000 | ||||||||
6 | 195000000 | 405000000 | ||||||||
7 | 175000000 | 580000000 | ||||||||
8 | 155000000 | 735000000 | ||||||||
9 | -120000000 | 615000000 | ||||||||
Payback period is the time by which undiscounted cashflow cover the intial investment outlay | ||||||||||
this is happening between year 4 and 5 | ||||||||||
therefore by interpolation payback period = 4 + (0-(-25000000))/(210000000-(-25000000)) | ||||||||||
4.11 Years | ||||||||||
Project | ||||||||||
IRR is the rate at which NPV =0 | ||||||||||
IRR | 0.153252394 | |||||||||
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Cash flow stream | -850000000 | 165000000 | 190000000 | 225000000 | 245000000 | 235000000 | 195000000 | 175000000 | 155000000 | -120000000 |
Discounting factor | 1 | 1.153252394 | 1.329991085 | 1.533815403 | 1.768876287 | 2.039960813 | 2.352589692 | 2.713129695 | 3.128923317 | 3.608438307 |
Discounted cash flows project | -850000000 | 143073624.5 | 142858100.4 | 146693011.1 | 138506011.9 | 115198291.3 | 82887381.8 | 64501155.37 | 49537807.19 | -33255383.57 |
NPV = Sum of discounted cash flows | ||||||||||
NPV Project = | -3.01749E-07 | |||||||||
Where | ||||||||||
Discounting factor = | (1 + IRR)^(Corresponding period in years) | |||||||||
Discounted Cashflow= | Cash flow stream/discounting factor | |||||||||
IRR= | 15.33% | |||||||||
Project | ||||||||||
Combination approach | ||||||||||
All negative cash flows are discounted back to the present and all positive cash flows are compounded out to the end of the project’s life | ||||||||||
Thus year 8 modified cash flow=(408533924.09)+(420029467.41)+(444110104.17)+(431773712.38)+(369777049.6)+(273960960)+(219520000)+(173600000) | ||||||||||
=2741305217.65 | ||||||||||
Thus year 0 modified cash flow=-850000000-43273203 | ||||||||||
=-850000000 | ||||||||||
Discount rate | 12.00% | |||||||||
Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
Cash flow stream | -850000000 | 165000000 | 190000000 | 225000000 | 245000000 | 235000000 | 195000000 | 175000000 | 155000000 | -120000000 |
Discount factor | 1 | 1.12 | 1.2544 | 1.404928 | 1.57351936 | 1.762341683 | 1.973822685 | 2.210681407 | 2.475963176 | 2.773078757 |
Compound factor | 1 | 2.475963176 | 2.210681407 | 1.973822685 | 1.762341683 | 1.57351936 | 1.404928 | 1.2544 | 1.12 | 1 |
Discounted cash flows | -850000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -43273203 |
Compounded cash flows | -1.17647E-09 | 408533924.1 | 420029467.4 | 444110104.2 | 431773712.4 | 369777049.6 | 273960960 | 219520000 | 173600000 | 0 |
Modified cash flow | -850000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2741305218 |
Discounting factor (using MIRR) | 1 | 1.138948991 | 1.297204804 | 1.477450102 | 1.682740303 | 1.916555369 | 2.182858804 | 2.486164831 | 2.831614926 | 3.225064962 |
Discounted cash flows | -850000000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 850000000 |
NPV = Sum of discounted cash flows | ||||||||||
NPV= | -2.38419E-07 | |||||||||
MIRR is the rate at which NPV = 0 | ||||||||||
MIRR= | 13.89% | |||||||||
Where | ||||||||||
Discounting factor = | (1 + discount rate)^(Corresponding period in years) | |||||||||
Discounted Cashflow= | Cash flow stream/discounting factor | |||||||||
Compounding factor = | (1 + reinvestment rate)^(time of last CF-Corresponding period in years) | |||||||||
Compounded Cashflow= | Cash flow stream*compounding factor | |||||||||
2
Accept project as NPV is positive & IRR & MIRR is more than discount rate