In: Finance
Kaeding Company manufactures car seats in its Hartford plant. Each car seat passes through the assembly department and the testing department. This problem focuses on the assembly department.
Physical Units |
Direct |
Conversion |
|||||
(Car Seats) |
Materials |
Costs |
|||||
Work in process, October 1 |
5,400 |
$ 1,344,600 |
$ 337,190 |
||||
Started during October 20172017 |
21,000 |
||||||
Completed during October 20172017 |
24,500 |
||||||
Work in process, October 31 Superscript |
1,900 |
||||||
Total costs added during October 20172017 |
$4,305,000 |
$2,567,430 |
|||||
Superscript aDegree of completion: direct materials, ?%; conversion costs, 50%.
Superscript bDegree of completion: direct materials, ?%; conversion costs, 70%.
Requirement 1. For each cost category, compute equivalent units in the assembly department. Show physical units in the first column of your schedule.
Equivalent Units |
|||
Physical |
Direct |
Conversion |
|
Flow of Production |
Units |
Materials |
Costs |
Work in process beginning |
|||
Started during current period |
|||
To account for |
|||
Completed and transferred out during current period |
|||
Work in process, ending |
|||
Accounted for |
|||
Work done to date |
1. |
For each cost category, compute equivalent units in the assembly department. Show physical units in the first column of your schedule. |
2. |
What issues should the manager focus on when reviewing the equivalent-unit calculations? |
3. |
For each cost category, summarize total assembly department costs for October 20172017 and calculate the cost per equivalent unit. |
4. |
Assign costs to units completed and transferred out and to units in ending work in process. |
Kaeding Company | |||||
Equivalent Units | |||||
1) | Flow of Production | Physical Units | Direct Material | Conversion | |
Work in Process beginning | 5400 | ||||
Started during the current period | 21000 | ||||
To account for | 26400 | ||||
Completed and transferred out during the current period | 24500 | 24500 | 24500 | ||
Work in Process ending | 1900 | 1900 | 1330 | ||
Account for | 26400 | 26400 | 25830 | ||
Material | Conversion | ||||
Work in Process ending | (1900*100%) | (1900*70%) | |||
2) | To show better performance , a department manager report higher degree of completion as a result understated cost per equivalent units and overstated income. | ||||
3) | Total Production cost | Direct Material | Conversion | ||
Work in process , beginning | $ 16,81,790.00 | $ 13,44,600.00 | $ 3,37,190.00 | ||
Cost added in current period | $ 68,72,430.00 | $ 43,05,000.00 | $ 25,67,430.00 | ||
Total cost to account for | $ 85,54,220.00 | $ 56,49,600.00 | $ 29,04,620.00 | ||
Cost incurred to date=(A) | $ 56,49,600.00 | $ 29,04,620.00 | |||
Equivalent Units=(B) | 26400 | 25830 | |||
Cost per Equivalent units=(A)/(B) | $ 214.00 | $ 112.45 | |||
4) | Assignment of cost | ||||
Completed and transferred out | $ 79,98,059.62 | $ 52,43,000.00 | $ 27,55,059.62 | ||
Ending Work in Process | $ 5,56,160.38 | $ 4,06,600.00 | $ 1,49,560.38 | ||
Total cost accounted for | $ 85,54,220.00 | $ 56,49,600.00 | $ 29,04,620.00 | ||
Assignment of cost | |||||
Completed and transferred out | (24500*$214) | (24500*112.45) | |||
Ending Work in process | (1900*$214) | (1330*$112.45) | |||